Jump to content

CaffeineAddict

Members
  • Content count

    308
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About CaffeineAddict

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    -
  • MSN
    -
  • Website URL
    http://-
  • ICQ
    -
  • Yahoo
    -
  • Skype
    -

Recent Profile Visitors

361 profile views
  1. I think a poll for a choice of decks is a good idea, rather than diving straight into community deck building. Maybe having a poll for the next one or two, and having the deck building running in parallel so it's ready for the one after?
  2. Given all your recent threads, are you really sure playing an LCG is right for you?
  3. CaffeineAddict

    Tried to play with real cards...

    Honestly this seems an odd perspective to me. I don't play on OCTGN and i won't be playing the digital version - I enjoy the game because it *isn't* a computer-based game, but a physical one. Building the decks and handling the cards is a big part of the experience. It seems strange that you would expect people who play a card game to prefer playing a digital version of that card game.
  4. CaffeineAddict

    Tried to play with real cards...

    I keep the player cards in binders sorted by sphere, type and release order, so I can find any card with minimal effort. When you disassemble a deck, put everything straight back where it should be. Know your decklist up front (i.e. a ringsdb decklist, or whatever), and deck building only takes a few minutes.
  5. CaffeineAddict

    There And Back Again

    Ugh. Bundling physical cards in with digital content is a really annoying way to go. I have no interest in the digital version, but I'm going to have to buy this if I want a complete physical card collection?
  6. CaffeineAddict

    Standalone decks

    Reading the rules for playing labarynths of lunacy, it says to follow the standalone deck building rules. This got me wondering - how do people tend to approach standalone deck building? Do people think there is an optimal Xp vs Weakness point in the scale? It'd be useful if we could search ArkhamDB decks by XP required, as well.
  7. CaffeineAddict

    Roam Across Rhovanion

    Nice that tactics can put progress on a location.
  8. I dont have numbers to hand, but i store my player cards in 3x3 pages, one card to a slot, not double sided, and with everything release so far, im up to two and a half ultra pro binders.
  9. CaffeineAddict

    Crossings of Poros Spoilers

    Finally received my copy yesterday.
  10. CaffeineAddict

    Which recent full set to get?

    If your choosing between harad and dreamchaser , I'd definitely recommend dream chaser, as the quests themselves are so much fun. You'd need The Grey Havens, though, as that contains cards needed for the whole cycle (similarly Sands of Harad for the head cycle).
  11. CaffeineAddict

    Crossings of Poros Spoilers

    Still no sign, three weeks on.
  12. CaffeineAddict

    Dim Carcosa

    Alas, I had no remaining sanity at the time.
  13. CaffeineAddict

    Dim Carcosa

    Just tried my first play of Dim Carcosa, using Min and Yorick, and even playing on easy mode I found it brutal. Both my investigators died and I lost the campaign. Going by the chaos bag setup at the start of the campaign, Hasturs ability that turns +/-1 and 0 tokens into auto-fail tokens actually makes easy mode the hardest to win?
  14. CaffeineAddict

    Crossings of Poros Spoilers

    I pre-ordered it from my usual supplier months ago, when its release looked imminent, so i've already paid for it. I don't understand what the holdup is.
  15. CaffeineAddict

    Sagas

    Don't forget you can play the quests on easy mode. Easy doesn't really mean "easy", they're still tough, but more manageable for smaller card pools.
×