-
Content Count
39 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
Necronson got a reaction from Artaterxes in Hmm. Yay?
Yeah the art just goes hand in hand with the rest of 2020.
-
-
-
Necronson got a reaction from apolishbeast in Hmm. Yay?
So. Is this an out of season april fools joke?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Necronson got a reaction from crimsonsun in Hmm. Yay?
So. Is this an out of season april fools joke?
-
Necronson reacted to ringofox in Hmm. Yay?
this happens when a company disconnect with the audience totally....
very bad art and design
poor concept
app mandatory driven - this is a videogame with toys?
the game lenght didnt respond to the modern era
expensive as ****
zero original
and they call it the "definitive" dungeon crawler?
i mean... comeon.... everything is bad with this ¿"game"?
and im not a troll... i spend this last days hyped as **** with this announcement...
-
Necronson got a reaction from Ishi Tonu in Is Badpenny a Terrible Card?
Autocannon + Soul Snatcher. Enjoy stacking aember to the high heavens with Bad Penny.
-
Necronson got a reaction from Deathseed in Is Badpenny a Terrible Card?
Autocannon + Soul Snatcher. Enjoy stacking aember to the high heavens with Bad Penny.
-
-
-
-
Necronson reacted to Palpster in Flanks
I just don't understand why you would suppose a single creature is not on a flank when the rules state that a) Each time a creature enters play, it must be placed on a flank and b) The creatures on the far right and far left of a player’s battleline are on the flanks of the line. It all but literally states that a single creature is on a flank (both even, but that hasn't mattered so far). Why deny this is so? Can you explain your reasoning behind this?
Going to rule a) Each time a creature enters play, it must be placed on a flank. You seem to agree this rule is for placement of creatures. So what do you see happen here? A creature enters play on a flank, but as soon as it's in in play (and the only creature) it stops being on a flank? I don't see anything in the rules to back this train of thought.
As to rule b) The creatures on the far right and far left of a player’s battleline are on the flanks of the line. Is a single creature not part of the battleline in your reasoning? Because if it is it just says there quite literally that on the right and left side is on the flanks. And a single creature is both on the far right and far left of the battleline.
I genuinely can't see the issue here :S
-
Necronson reacted to Ishi Tonu in Shedding Chains
That's part of the fun, the player interaction.............right? lol
-
Necronson reacted to Palpster in Play Variations
I've seen how some people shuffle...I'm not swapping ?
-
-
Necronson got a reaction from Robin Graves in Punishing skill...
Shouldn't be a problem no. Im sure some industrious person could whip up a randomized deck script for it aswell.
-
Necronson reacted to Budgernaut in Runewars vs. A Song of Ice and Fire
You mean the variance decreases, not that the averages change. If you have to get 4+ to hit and you roll 2 dice compared to 20, you're more likely to get all hit or all miss with 2 dice than with 20. That's the benefit you're trying to talk about and it has nothing to do with averages.
-
Necronson got a reaction from Budgernaut in Runewars vs. A Song of Ice and Fire
Well they did go over that alittle, he just didn't want to answer at that point, something in the works yadda yadda yadda. Like ranged units was some kind of company secret or something. Pfft. If they do forgo having ranged units then that would just be really really weird.
