Jump to content

JanB

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    376

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JanB

  7. Posted

    thx for your replys. it was not my intention to annoy you. Sry if i don't get it after your first tries of explaination.

    Often there are discussions about wording or syntax, so i hope you can understand why i ask about it. 

     

    About the "exception" getting shadow cards on additional attacks ... this can be found in the FAQ - is the FAQ not a kind of "rulesheet"? So, if yes, the "dealt a shadow card" is referenced a second time in the rules .. or not?

  8. Posted

     

    Hinder

    The Hinder keyword appears on the Huorn enemies in this 
    scenario. While engaged with a player, an enemy with the 
    Hinder keyword is not dealt a shadow card and does not make 
    an attack during the combat phase.

     

    This is the rule for Hinder ... 

     

    The situation is that the Huorn enemies are engaged with the players when "The Forest's Malice" shows up.

     

    So the second sentence of the rule is fullfilled -> While engaged with a player ... 

    So, an enemy with the Hinder keyword is not dealt a shadow card.

    The second part specifies the behavior during the combat phase -> does not make an attack.

     

    So, when "The Forest's Mailce" shows up, all Huorn enemies will make an attack (because we are not in the combat phase), but will not get any shadow cards for this attach, as stated in the short paragraph.

     

    OR .. belongs the condition "during the combat phase" to the first part "...is not dealt a shadow card", too? That is my primary question :)

  9. Posted

    Thanks for your answers.

     

    my understanding of the rulesheet is that each Huorn-enemy will not "normally" attack during combat phase and will get no shadow card it it makes an attack. Right?

     

    So the treachery card let them normal attack but without dealing shadow cards for this attacks. For me, it's an out-of-order attack.

  10. Posted

    http://deckbauer.telfador.net/card.html&id=4251

     

    Need some clarification about The Forest's Malice. The Huorn attacks places outside the combat phase .. do they get shadowcards for the attacks?

     

    The rulesheet specifises, that a Huorn-Enemy does not get a shadowcard when it attacks and do not attack in combat phase.

     

    But the FAQ says, that an enemy which makes an attack outside the combat phase will get a shadow card.

     

    I'm confused.

     

     

  15. Posted · Edited by JanB

    Thx I3afonthewind for your help, but i have to modify your deck, have a look at my cardpool.

    For the event at sat i choose this deck:

     

    Heroes

    Bifur

    Dáin Ironfoot

    Glóin

     

    Allies

    2x Rivendell Minstrel

    2x Miner of the Iron Hills

    1x Brok Ironfist

    3x Erebor Record Keeper

    1x Erebor Battle Master

    1x Faramir

    3x Gandalf

    2x Erebor Hammersmith

    1x Henamarth Riversong

    2x Longbeard Elder

    2x Warden of Healing

     

    Attachments

    2x Dwarrowdelf Axe

    1x Celebrían's Stone

    1x Legacy of Durin

    1x Dark Knowledge

    1x A Burning Brand

    1x Love of Tales

    2x Ring Mail

    2x Song of Battle

    2x Song of Wisdom

    1x Self Preservation

    1x Hardy Leadership

    1x Boots from Erebor

    1x Dúnedain Cache

     

    Events

    2x Daeron's Runes

    1x Dawn Take You All

    2x Lure of Moria

    2x Durin's Song

    1x For Gondor!

    1x Secret Paths

    1x Radagast's Cunning

    2x Sneak Attack

    1x We Are Not Idle

  17. Posted · Edited by JanB

    Hi Folks,

     

    after waiting for feedback our local store invites me to the Fellowship Event.

    A first look at the cards of Fog on the Barrow Downs gives me the impression that every member of the group has to build a deck which should be able to handle questing and battle (defend and attack) while in your own staging area.

     

    My cardpool is restricted to one core set, mirkwood, khazad-dum and dwarrowdelf, so i think about some hero-combinations like this:

     

    - Elrond/Glorfindel/Legolas (without Vilya)

    Questing, Battling seems fine, additional healing and opporunity of lowering thread and gaining Weapons

     

    - Aragorn/Eleanor/Eowyn (with celebrian stone)

    More Willpower, lack of Battling, no healing, no tactic-cards, cancel bad effects

     

    - Imrahil/Legolas/Thalin (with eagles)

    moderate-questing, direkt Damage, Eargle-Power, no healing, noch canceling-responses

     

     

    Its not easy .. perhaps you can give me some hints for good hero combinations with this small cardpool to get a chance in this scenario.

  20. Posted · Edited by JanB

    Ah ok, that makes sense .. the "," before "or" makes the difference.

    If you look at Leafs of Tree or Men in the Dark there is no "," before the "or" - so you have to to the first part and if you can't, fullfill the second part.

     

     

    When Revealed: Each player must pay 1 resource for each attachment he controls or discard all attachments he controls.

    When Revealed: Each hero must pay 1 resource or take 1 damage. If no hero takes damage from this effect, Men in the Dark gains surge.
×
×
  • Create New...