X - Legolas Y - Eowyn Z - Boromir (Le) AA - Aragorn (Le) AB - Thalin AC - Eleanor AD - Beregond AE - Bifur AF - Sam Gamgee AG - Merry AH - Haldir of Lorien AI - Galadriel AJ - Mablung AK - Gimli AL - Hama AM - Dain

Mmm, you mean "Enemies that were previously set aside and revealed during the quest phase" ? Ok, i can live with that. Thalin ist superb how he is

So, the Great Cave-troll can go into Ranger Spikes but not into a Fores Snare?

Mmm .. what about Hidden Cards in the "Blood of Gondor"-Szenario? If Thalin is commited to the quest, does he deal damage to Enemies, which are revealed from hidden cards? e.g. by 'Lying in Wait'

A - Nori B - Brand C - Dwalin D - Thorin E - Frodo F - Thalin G - Caldara H - Balin I - Prince Imrahil J - Denethor K - Bifur L - Idraen M - Dunhere N - Gandalf O - Haldor P - Galadriel Q - Beorn R - Mablung S - Celeborn T - Gimli U - Hama V - Dain W- Eomer

Ok, thanks for clarification ..

thx for your replys. it was not my intention to annoy you. Sry if i don't get it after your first tries of explaination. Often there are discussions about wording or syntax, so i hope you can understand why i ask about it. About the "exception" getting shadow cards on additional attacks ... this can be found in the FAQ - is the FAQ not a kind of "rulesheet"? So, if yes, the "dealt a shadow card" is referenced a second time in the rules .. or not?

This is the rule for Hinder ... The situation is that the Huorn enemies are engaged with the players when "The Forest's Malice" shows up. So the second sentence of the rule is fullfilled -> While engaged with a player ... So, an enemy with the Hinder keyword is not dealt a shadow card. The second part specifies the behavior during the combat phase -> does not make an attack. So, when "The Forest's Mailce" shows up, all Huorn enemies will make an attack (because we are not in the combat phase), but will not get any shadow cards for this attach, as stated in the short paragraph. OR .. belongs the condition "during the combat phase" to the first part "...is not dealt a shadow card", too? That is my primary question

Thanks for your answers. my understanding of the rulesheet is that each Huorn-enemy will not "normally" attack during combat phase and will get no shadow card it it makes an attack. Right? So the treachery card let them normal attack but without dealing shadow cards for this attacks. For me, it's an out-of-order attack.

http://deckbauer.telfador.net/card.html&id=4251 Need some clarification about The Forest's Malice. The Huorn attacks places outside the combat phase .. do they get shadowcards for the attacks? The rulesheet specifises, that a Huorn-Enemy does not get a shadowcard when it attacks and do not attack in combat phase. But the FAQ says, that an enemy which makes an attack outside the combat phase will get a shadow card. I'm confused.

damage another character, and if some excess points left .. damage another character. How terrible, if you chump-block!

Ok .. what cards next?

Play with only one coreset as a base and you will have only UC in your deck at maximum.

Nice job .. but why is Steed of the Mark not restricted? And why Warhorse costs only 1 and Steed of Minas Ithil 2? For the "same" Effekt (boosting one attribute while ready)

Thx I3afonthewind for your help, but i have to modify your deck, have a look at my cardpool. For the event at sat i choose this deck: Heroes Bifur Dáin Ironfoot Glóin Allies 2x Rivendell Minstrel 2x Miner of the Iron Hills 1x Brok Ironfist 3x Erebor Record Keeper 1x Erebor Battle Master 1x Faramir 3x Gandalf 2x Erebor Hammersmith 1x Henamarth Riversong 2x Longbeard Elder 2x Warden of Healing Attachments 2x Dwarrowdelf Axe 1x Celebrían's Stone 1x Legacy of Durin 1x Dark Knowledge 1x A Burning Brand 1x Love of Tales 2x Ring Mail 2x Song of Battle 2x Song of Wisdom 1x Self Preservation 1x Hardy Leadership 1x Boots from Erebor 1x Dúnedain Cache Events 2x Daeron's Runes 1x Dawn Take You All 2x Lure of Moria 2x Durin's Song 1x For Gondor! 1x Secret Paths 1x Radagast's Cunning 2x Sneak Attack 1x We Are Not Idle

i think it's not crabble's intention to make agressive promotion - he simply gives you, what the community whishes. .. a spoiler of the cards. Why should he wrote an english version of his article? If you want to understand what he wrote, try to translate it by yourself. As a german .. i do the same with your texts

Hi Folks, after waiting for feedback our local store invites me to the Fellowship Event. A first look at the cards of Fog on the Barrow Downs gives me the impression that every member of the group has to build a deck which should be able to handle questing and battle (defend and attack) while in your own staging area. My cardpool is restricted to one core set, mirkwood, khazad-dum and dwarrowdelf, so i think about some hero-combinations like this: - Elrond/Glorfindel/Legolas (without Vilya) Questing, Battling seems fine, additional healing and opporunity of lowering thread and gaining Weapons - Aragorn/Eleanor/Eowyn (with celebrian stone) More Willpower, lack of Battling, no healing, no tactic-cards, cancel bad effects - Imrahil/Legolas/Thalin (with eagles) moderate-questing, direkt Damage, Eargle-Power, no healing, noch canceling-responses Its not easy .. perhaps you can give me some hints for good hero combinations with this small cardpool to get a chance in this scenario.

you can have 2 or more locations with the same "highest" thread .. in this case you can do ... 1) loose control of all locations with the highest thread 2) loose control of one location with the highest thread I would prefer 2) ..

That's the problem ... if you can't fullfill X, you will not be able to do Y.

Ah ok, that makes sense .. the "," before "or" makes the difference. If you look at Leafs of Tree or Men in the Dark there is no "," before the "or" - so you have to to the first part and if you can't, fullfill the second part.

Hi Folks, the treacherycard "Counter-Attack" from Assault on Osgiliath reads: How can i use the second part of this card if i must do the first part?

You can follow crabble's link in his signature to his blog, where he gives us a pic of Mablung: http://menofgondor.wordpress.com/

ok .. thanks a lot for your both helpful answers.

Hi Julia, don't get me wrong, the enemy with the runner-shadowcard makes an additional attack, as an result of the shadowcard. The question is, if previous schadowcards (including the runner-shadowcard) get discarded before this attack or they count towards the new attack.

Greetings from Germany, have a question about the Goblin Runner (The Hobbit: Over Hill and Under Hill) http://deckbauer.telfador.net/card.html&id=1215 Its Shadoweffect let the enemy make a new attack (with a new shadowcard) .. what happens with the shadowcard(s) the eneme already have? Do i discard them or count them to the new one?