Jump to content

Varikas

Members
  • Content Count

    76
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Varikas got a reaction from griton in Thoughts on Showing All Act 1 Shop Items After Interlude?   
    I am not agree...Its ture that, sometimes it can be done, cause the difference woulnt be very big but...in other times the difference can be very very big...
    For example, if during the Act I adventures and Interlude you dont get the Rune Plate armor...its a very very big mistake (or bad luck...) cause its one of the best armors of the game. With that rule, you KNOW that, in Act II, you are going to have it, SURE 100%, but if you let all to the lucky, with more and more expansions and more and more cards, in the future would be very very difficult to get it, or other very good Act I items like bearded axe, mana weave, crossbow and so on...
    Thats why the rule exist, to give the chance to the heroes to buy all Act I items that they want and dont let all to the lucky...Thats why if your heroes didnt buy some (or all) of that very good items cause they didnt see them, it would be quite unfair to take out that rule and dont let the heroes the change of geting that excelent items.
    And also, as I said in my first post, maybe the heroes could have lucky and see the crossbow for example, but they didnt have enought money in that moment, but they like that weapon and want to buy it...it would be quite imposible that they could draw it again, too much lucky, but with that rule its sure that they are going to have that chance again...
  2. Like
    Varikas got a reaction from griton in Sweep + Reach   
    and not only magic...the LoS rule of this game can be a lot of things but not logical. Its absurd that I can make an attack diagonally with a rock just in the middle..., but that is the rule...
    Can you change all what you dont see logical? of course yes, are playing Descent? of course not...
    If you change things like that, you are unbalancing the game, giving more power to sweep than the game developers want, or in the case of LoS decreasing the power of abilities based on LoS...
    That could make in a future a game very unbalanced and a bad experience of it.
    If you do someting, do it well, so my advice is that, if you want to give more power to Sweep only cause you see it more logical, put him less health points. If you do that, maybe the game could be more balanced, and maybe you could be playing something similar to Descent second edition, thats my advice.
    But I dont understand something.
    1º) The people of this forum tell you that there is a ruling about it, and you dont belive that rule.
    2º) You make the question to the game developers
    3º) The game developers tell you the same than in the ruling
    4º) After all of that...you play like you want, like at the begining...why did you do that questions? only to say: "ok, I am playing bad and I am going to play bad also in the future..." I dont understand it sorry.
  3. Like
    Varikas got a reaction from Robin13 in Sweep + Reach   
    and not only magic...the LoS rule of this game can be a lot of things but not logical. Its absurd that I can make an attack diagonally with a rock just in the middle..., but that is the rule...
    Can you change all what you dont see logical? of course yes, are playing Descent? of course not...
    If you change things like that, you are unbalancing the game, giving more power to sweep than the game developers want, or in the case of LoS decreasing the power of abilities based on LoS...
    That could make in a future a game very unbalanced and a bad experience of it.
    If you do someting, do it well, so my advice is that, if you want to give more power to Sweep only cause you see it more logical, put him less health points. If you do that, maybe the game could be more balanced, and maybe you could be playing something similar to Descent second edition, thats my advice.
    But I dont understand something.
    1º) The people of this forum tell you that there is a ruling about it, and you dont belive that rule.
    2º) You make the question to the game developers
    3º) The game developers tell you the same than in the ruling
    4º) After all of that...you play like you want, like at the begining...why did you do that questions? only to say: "ok, I am playing bad and I am going to play bad also in the future..." I dont understand it sorry.
×
×
  • Create New...