Well, either there's an overwhelming consensus, and you can point me to examples, or not, and it's just an opinion. The difference is quite important, as you presented it as a fact in your rebuttal of Floris' claim that your tank was over powered, you see.
It's no point of reference. If you really want to push that line of thought, you're going to have to show the results of fields tests on 17 pounders and 88's mounted on walking chassis. How does having to handle the recoil from two 88's effect the german vehicle? How does the more compact frame of the Allied tank compare to the German tank? How does the 17 pounder having a 360 degree firing arc compare to the 88's having a 0 degree firing arc? What ammo are the two weapons firing? How does being set in an alternative time line, where both weapons have had an additional 2 years of development or neglect effect the two weapons?
I don't think I cited you as saying that. I'm using that term. I assumed that as you argued with Floris' assertion that your unit was "too strong", that you were disagreeing with his conclusion. If, instead, you agree with me that it is over-powered, then of course we have no disagreement there, and it only leaves me wondering why you'd create something you know to be over-powered?