Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

hehe... thanks guys. Also I defiantly stand by my alignment choices!

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

Had some spare time and decided to amuse myself. What alignments do you see on this forum?

I'll be rocking Chaos, no matter the meta. I'll make it work, you hear me! I'LL MAKE IT WORK!

wouldn't surprise me to see these kind of things as keywords. 

there are no cards with updated text and there probably never will be. Only a few packs in any other lcg are fixed in this way. Gekoth has a thread at BGG where he has recreated the cards you can print out at artscow or somthing if you want.

Edit your profile, Ignore Preferences, type in username.

What? This entire thread is nothing but whining, and if you go though my posts you see i NEVER insult anyone directly or use race, sex, or any sort of personal attacks (well never is a strong word.. maybe sometimes.. but rarely). It is YOU (and others) that attack me.. and for what .. because I do not share your sentiments on how people should behave.
 
I speak EXACTLY like I do here in real life, and so dose everyone I know and for the record in "real life" no one would so blatantly call out others and try to publicly shame them or any of the other crap that goes on in this thread.. In real life and communities you choose to not interact with people you dislike.. not try to change them. It is like sending fags to jail because you do not like fags.. ridicules, absolutely ridicules.
 
Some people, especially yanks like to think that everything needs to be gentrified and censored so there is nothing left apart from what doesn't offend anyone. Maybe that is a byproduct of their insane gun laws.. still that is so ******* retarded I do not even know whereto start. The sheer idiocy of it boggles my mind. 
 
This is the real world.. instead of stamping a foot down like a petulant 5 year old girl and making a big fuss cause the mean old misanthrope on the forum used words I do not like.. maybe try being an adult and realize that others may not share your sentiments, this is a community.. and like any community and a global one at that representing lost of ages and countries you need to accept others not control them. The sheer arrogance it takes to expect everyone to conform to a behavior that is deemed "acceptable" by a few vocal self important people is beyond me.

you know I have always thought (with the exception of the original LCGs) that deck customization has been pretty good in the core sets. Especially netrunner. Players have long memories and those originals. W:I and CoC and aGoT requiring 3 copies as either all or most of the cards were in singles to even start playing. The 2 new ones Star Wars and Netrunner there was a ton of deck building right out of Core.

Here's the deal with Star Wars.
 
People who play other card games keep pointing out how the deck building in SW is extremely limited.  And it is.  Not only does it have the smallest card pool out of the LCGs, it also uses the objective set system which hugely reduces your ability to tune your deck.
 
People who like Star Wars feel that this is some sort of attack against them or their game, so they feel compelled to argue.  Usually this is done in the form of saying that Star Wars deck building is "challenging".  And this is true too.  But, challenging basically just means "difficult", it doesn't mean "rich and varied".  Deckbuilding in Star Wars is difficult because of the restrictions placed on it.  You're trying to build a coherent deck but each card you put in voluntarily brings up to 4 other cards you didn't necessarily want.  It's great that a skillful player can work to reduce the damage this does to their deck (compared to a freely-constructed one) and this DOES require skill and knowledge, but you're just fighting an arbitrary system.  Like sure, it's harder to pass a math test while hopping on one foot and dodging baseballs being thrown at you, but don't mistake that for having passed a higher level math test because those are two different things and their difficulty or "challenge" stems from vastly different sources.

It's all in how you spin it.
 
One side can claim that "oh, that's mostly just clarification and not actually errata" and have a point.  It's also correct to say that in one year Netrunner has a 14 page FAQ and Call of Cthulhu is something like 8 years old and has a 26 page FAQ.  A lot of errata for every game could be considered clarification.  The significant different to me is whether it's clarification of something that was relatively clear already and only mistaken by beginners, or clarification of something that was frequently one wrong or required deep rules knowledge to decipher.  And I'm not going to bother examining every single errata to try to classify them.

For sure. IG would have tons of equipment.. they could be like a realy good support faction brinign in heavy tanks and stuff for Space Marines and Orc decks.
 

I dunno, about these guys I know the least about the Tau. All I really know is that they have super advanced technology and all those wired slave race things Kroots or w/e. Still I would expect droids and robots and other more tradition scifi quirkiness.. maybe manifesting in strong control decks
 

This wouldn't surprise me at all, like more dmg when damaged... they get a lot of their tech from salvage so I think they could have a lot of yard play.. pulling cards from opponents discards and stuff. That'd be cool.
 

I think these will be the hardest to give flavor like the space marines are so fleshed out .. just so many chapters and so much lore.. they can do pretty much anything.. but I think it would suck for them to be all rounders. Though I can see why that fits. We do not really know if they are going to stick with one chapter or what and it is the chapter that will dictate much... I dunno.. this is the faction that can be anything and for that reason it is hard to imagine what it could be
 

yeah, I was thinking this as well... a kind of "magic" deck. All tricks and manipulation.. changing icons, spawning cards at the point of conflic resolution or removing opponents from battle.. recursion, card draw.. all that kind of stuff.
 

Not sure I agree here, I think Dark Elder more for control and manipulation theme works. Though I was recently thinking about this and thought that it would be awesome to put the webways in it somehow. I know I said bounce effects for Chaos, but I am now changing that to these guys.. Webways.. bouncing cards into battlefield.. telephoning form one planet to the pother at the point of battle.. cool stuff like that.
 

I think this could be a terrible mistake. It would really suck if these guys where just Space marines with spiky armour. I know I said bounce effects before.. now I am thinking Sacrifice effects... things like playing a ritual card and sacing cultists to it, or healing your main hero by killing things stuff like that.. death of foes or friends just as positive for chaos! But yeah, I am thinking sacrifice effects for this one.

Theories -
 
IG will be Mixed @ the start will be a chuds + heavy equipment deck and try and out shoot there opponent through numbers and low cost units. (later i would like to see an armored core deck develop)
 
Orcs - I see orcs as the "rush" faction but i dont know how that will translate into the game - Im interested to see how they play - im guessing they will be fuled by bloodlust and will probably combo alot off injured units.
 
Tau - Shooty shoot shoot shoot
 
Marines - Combo + All Arounders
 
Dark Eldar - Rush fast attack tricks, unit movement units that could hop locations min max units that either kill a target outright or just suck.
 
Eldar - Control - Event cards - psychic powers - medium to high cost units that are glass cannons.
 
Chaos - Same as marines but with more psychic powers and event cards.

FFG likes to have each faction sorta focus on one thing. What would that one thing be these guys?
Obliviously this is just guess work and has no meaning.. no one knows but the NDA beta testers.. still I think it would be interesting to see what others are thinking. Plus we get to talk about the game.
I think IG would be a rush race... and I kind of think if they were knights would it would be really cool. a knight is a type of card that buffs other cards sharing the same keywords. So say you have a 0 attack IG trooper, that adds +1 Attack to all IG Troopers... so 1 might is 1 attack (0+1buff) but 2 out would be 4 attack (0+2buffs each card). This would be good for IG as they focus on mass units in the tabletop supported by heavy artillery. I think this would make a good "focus" for IG.
Orks could also be a good rush deck but I think the cards would be stronger on there own as orks are pretty tough. So I would say strong cards with resource ramping to make them play cheaper.
Chaos... with all that demon summoning.. I think maybe bouncing cards.. things that come into play then bounce back to hand or sac at the end of the turn. Like you summon a bloodletter and it has to remove a counter each turn, when no counters it dies.

1) There is no new player action window. As you surmised, the new rules are to determine who needs to respond when the card says "you".
 
2) The Black Riders supports easy mode - see page nine of the insert (the cards to remove are the ones with a gold border)