Jump to content

Rogue30

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    1,413

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rogue30

  2. Posted

    ktom said:

    Why is the statement "attachments are discarded from play if the card they are attached to leaves play for any reason" from the rules not a passive effect?

    My point was, that it can be special passive game effect, not passive ability.

     

    ktom said:

    Your other option is completely foreign to the game's timing structure.

    And why do you think I wrote all this in the first place? Nevermind, you will never understand what I'm doing here, just forget that I ask this question, ok?

  3. Posted

    Forgive me, but this game is too complicated for me. So you say that "cannot be discarded from play while attached" is simply false at that moment, because the card is not considered attached?

    BTW Moribund card has left play "but only for the purposes of triggering responses and passive abilities". Rulebook attachment definition is not passive ability. Should this be corrected?

    You certainly don't say that moribund character with Aegon's Blade doesn't have STR +2 for purposes of triggering Free Cities Mercenaries, right?

    You said yourself "only applies to checking play restrictions" - and "cannot be discarded" is constant effect not play restriction.

  5. Posted

    Old Ben said:

    rings said:

     

    The fact that NO successful gaming company (that I know of) has ever gone 7+ years without some sort of rotation says something. 

     

     

     

    Decipher has with the SW: CCG. They had no rotation and you were able to play every card x60 in your deck. But they had teh power creep in the game and well they are history today. 

    And people still playing, virtual sets still coming and people are still buying cards to complete their collection. That says something. lengua.gif

  7. Posted

    berto said:

    In my eyes all changes done were completely not necessary.

    Month ago you wrote at Polish forum, for example (translation):

    "Is turn the same thing as phase?" (about Killer + Lead link combo)

    "****, shield can stop forever burning?" (about Paper shield and canceling deathbound cards)

    "I like this deck, maybe I change my Night's Watch for Martell" (about Greg's Gencon deck)

    "Tell me why there is Edric Dayne in this deck? And moreover, 3 copies? His effect is mediocre. And Narrow escape - is this some defence against Valar Morghulis?" (about Greg's Gencon deck)

    "Tell me how this combo works with Robert. He can stand only once." (about Brett's winning deck)

     

    Also, you did create topic How to stop Maester dominance and you asked what to do with this sick combo.

     

    And today you are experienced game expert? Wow. Impressive.

    Shenanigans said:

    Berto is a European player

    I'm pretty sure berto is from Mars.

  9. Posted

    Mathias Fricot said:

    If I can use a a single army in my bolton deck ranging from one to two gold (of which there are nine) and hit it for zero cost with a Price of War or just a vanilla condemned by the council, or salladhor, or war horn, or frozen solid, or freezing rain, or climbing spikes, or theon, or any other location hate, like say tyrion's chain, then I am not at all worried about that cards ability to define an environment.

    Price of war? Condemned? Yeah, right...

  11. Posted

    Stag Lord said:

    Is it balanced though - and tricky to pull off  - also sure.

    I'm not so sure. It can be played in 3rd turn. There is nothing tricky. You just play it and that's it. Opponent has little or no chance to stop it. But you are probably right - I don't understand this game anymore. So you are saying that Burning on the sand was restricted not because this card is too good, but only because Martell are dominant?

  14. Posted

    Shenanigans said:

    it has plenty of limiting factors: 4-cost, must be knelt AND discarded

    And of course you did play against it with smart player, right? Except for rarely used Salladhor, you are defenceless against it. You can use Nightmares or Frozen Solid but it depends on who is first player. So I'm not sure what you mean "knelt AND discarded". Effectively, for 4 gold you have a card "Win at least 3 challenges this round. Your characters cannot be killed. Cannot be canceled." And then you use Regroup obviously. That's significant power shift for 4 gold, I think.

  16. Posted

    Twn2dn said:

    I think what happens is that a good deckbuilder creates a fantastic deck archetype, which is then copied (net-decked).

    And is this really a problem? Skill to play is required, right? Doesn't combo environment actually creates more netdecking?

    BTW: I would like to (at least) restrict Rhaenys's Hill. lengua.gif

  18. Posted

    Personally I will never understand how maesters can have more STR than the strongest army in this game. That's incredibly stupid, just like Taste for blood x3. Corrupt Contender +10 STR? Maybe in next set we should have characters with +100 STR to deal with one maester? Maester should have useful abilities, not STR.

  24. Posted

    Awesome report thorondor! I love when deck comes with description (why those plots, the plan).

    Mathias Fricot said:

    People should start OOH Reek in martell, make sure you win that intrigue challenge and take control of robert. Then Ghaston Grey your (other) noble to get Reek back. Think about it.

    House Stark only.

  25. Posted

    Either you trigger fiefdoms' marshalling effect (you don't pay influence then) or you pay/kneel influence (you don't trigger fiefdoms' marshalling effect). Moreover it seems like you want to play two actions at once (playing Companions and triggering fiefdoms) - you must trigger fiefdoms before you play Companions or left it standing for their effect.

×
×
  • Create New...