Sithlord Threadkiller said: is there any way not to get hosed by rule by decree turn 1 if you have gold tooth mines in play? Remember that "Golden Tooth Mines" (passive ability) works after "when revealed" effects.

Laban Shrewsbury said: The characters previously saved are now killed all over again and require a second save to survive, right? Yep.

Also, remember that card or rule always will tell you what to do. Claim - you take counter from power pool. Move - you move counter from card to card.

divinityofnumber said: If you have a couple of cards in play that have Renown, and a couple that do not: If I initiate a challenge, and win it, with a character that does not have renown...do all of my Renown guys still get power counters? Or, do I have to win a challenge with a Renown character, and then all of the other renown characters and that character get power counters? From rulebook: If you win a challenge (either as attacker or defender), each of your participating characters with the “Renown” keyword claims 1 power after the challenge resolves. divinityofnumber said: but then since your opponent has none, you take from the power pool? No. Also, you should read about infamy keyword

Gualdo said: So I can only use cards to Raven Set? I don't know for sure. Just trying to avoid FFG wrath

Kuba said: Mandon Moore Chaalenge ability. How it precisely works? Just like normal out of Shadows mechanic - the difference is that it is your challenge action. So you have a choice: bring him at the beginning of the phase or as a challenge action with surprise.

I use 9-pocket pages (sorted by House, then type), because of LCG I rarely have more than 3 copies of each card.

divinityofnumber said: I don't think that companies should be too scared of this. Nothing can compare to playing in person. So true! Gualdo, I've read somewhere that there is unofficial agreement that you can't use card images if they are not half year old. So I'm not sure if FFG guys will be happy with this.

Sithlord Threadkiller said: Maester wendamyr: can he kneel to save himself then stand after kneeling 2 influence and kneel again save another character for claim 2 challenges as well as mass kill/discard effects? Yes. Sithlord Threadkiller said: if a character's strength is zero can that character still initiate a challenge? Yes. Sithlord Threadkiller said: what happens when a card with duplicates gets sent back to your deck (ie raven effect) can you discard a dupe to prevent that from happening? Yes. Sithlord Threadkiller said: Is a duplicate an attachment? No. Sithlord Threadkiller said: if dany's handmaiden has rhaegar's harp attached can she discard the raven attachments when she leaves play? Yes. Sithlord Threadkiller said: what are some nonraven cards per se that can potentially dislodge a raven attachment? I think only Harp and Old Nan.

xenoss said: But note that the "updated" sign is taken away from the upcoming products page now. So? "Updated" is related to information not to a product.

Any players from Warszawa?

Kzer-za said: Condemned by the Realm. You choose an opponent, and then both you and that player choose a character to kill. That wouldn't be that stupid. This plot is worse - you are killing your character. But this shouldn't be treated as a flaw of Core Set. If you play a joust, then you can (you should) customize plot decks.

Did you try among book fans? You could ask on forum (for example asoiaf.westeros.org) if anyone in your area want to try this game with his favourite characters.

eloooooooi said: Also, you will spend around $90-$120 when a new Core Set or Expansion is released (there have been 2 releases in 1 year so far). @divinityofnumber: this game is very affordable (just one chapter pack release per month). Above expansions mentioned are just House Greyjoy and Martell "starters" and you shouldn't expect 2 expansions per year in the future.

Just to avoid more confusion in this topic (ktom must be sleepy or something ): ktom said: assuming it resolves and isn't a tie - in those cases, there is no winner and no loser In case of tie attacker wins. ktom said: If the defender loses a challenge and the attacker had more participating characters with the Deadly keyword, that losing player must choose and kill a participating defending character Deadly is independent of challenge result.

That success is probably more or less due the Core Set (attractive to board game players etc.), so FFG wouldn't want to change that. Dreamed solution would be: selling Core Set and "1 House starters" concurrently.

BTW If save by Wendamyr was not successful (canceled), then he cannot use second part (stand that character) of his ability. But what is considered successful or not in the case of Compelled by the North? If there are no defending characters on table, then we treat this as a failure, correct? (thus no standing for Stark characters with Banner)

LetsGoRed said: Regarding LCG "philosophy", it has been the case from the get-go that Chapter Packs are a one time printing. Eventually they'll sell out and, unless FFG changes its plans, you won't be able to buy some Packs that others might own. That's no different than a new version of the Core Set. Well, Asylum packs are reprinted now. Besides, if game is successful it would be weird not to reprint.

dormouse said: 2) How is a new core Set against the LCG Philosophy? If they change the set of cards, that means that some of them are not available anymore, thus not every player is equal. dormouse said: As a matter of fact with all the people on here who talk about new reprints updating the Core Set to a version 2 makes a lot of sense. Well, that people already possess CS. Nobody asked potential players

thorin_81 said: Can I draw 2 cards (by activating the response of each Desert Exiles) with only 1 reinforcement played? Yes, because that's two separate cards, thus two separate responses.

Gualdo said: How can I exclude a character to defend with 'Shore Leave'? Probably he thinks about cards like standing Renly or new Robert. Or using "Bound by duty".

Are you asking because of draw cap? (max 3) Or because of one response per trigger rule? (You can use it only once per Reinforcements event)

dormouse said: If they don't reprint the Core Set but instead create a new Core Set That would be against LCG philosophy. Besides, info says "This is a reprint!".

He probably thinks about cards like Drogon or Aegon's Legacy.

ktom said: Margaery does not blank "card abilities" - she blanks "card text," Sorry, my mistake