Rex Tan said: Lady's ability have still effecting? Yes. Lady works directly on Sansa. Renly's immunity have nothing to do with it. Rex Tan said: if a character immune to another character abilities, is this include Keyword? such as, deadly or stealth? "Card abilities" (i.e. "Character ability," "Location ability," or "Attachment ability") refers to anything in a card's text box, except for traits, keywords, and flavor text.

"Response: Cancel the effects of a response without an influence cost." Can I cancel response of Joffrey Baratheon (kneel 3 influence or kneel 1 N character) when a player chooses to pay by kneeling noble character? And what with cards like "A Pinch of Powder" when influence cost is irrelevant to first part of effect?

ktom said: I'm going to describe the whole situation rather than answer your questions directly (up-front) because it's more than likely more questions will arise otherwise. Good idea. Thanks!

"Dragon sight" is on table: 1.Targaryen player declares challenge. Defender declares 1 defender. Now, can attacking player not to declare any attackers? 2. Just to be sure: after declaring attackers Greatjon still can use his ability, right?

Can I "cancel a triggered effect that chooses a HS character as the only target" in case of "Response: After Dragon Skull comes out of Shadows, attach it to an opponent's character "? I think no, because Dragon Skull doesn't say "choose", but I'm not sure.

Hmm, it is much more simpler the moment I thougth about Blockade and gold bonus locations Thanks for help.

Problem is, there is no cards example which say: "reduce character STR by X where X is its current STR", nor "its STR = 0". People may argue about no explicite -X , so this should be in FAQ I think. Ok, then "Blockade" is no good for "Starve for Your King!" (and intuition told me otherwise) The same with Robb and army cost zero. If they are played in other deck than Stark (unlikely off course), you stilll have to pay gold penalty. My Targaryen opponent will not be pleased with this ruling

Hmm, after posting this question I checked tzumainn.com and I thought your answer there is clear. But now I'm confused. "Reduce" word is problematic here, I think.

"... choose a character controlled by that opponent, and reduce its STR to 0 until the end of the round." If later in the round some effect gives this character bonus +2 STR, then its STR is still zero, correct?

DB_Cooper said: He did a mistake at the start: Robb + Narrow Sea. I started with a slow set up...But had the Wrong Dwarf in hand, went for a Carrion with the plot and shuffled it back with the gentle effort of Lion's Gate. Did I get it correctly? Have you used Wrong Dwarf on Robb?

Slapul said: I'm thinking that at the begining of assign damage the fight actually begins and every effects take place simultaneously and any phase has to be completed before any changes could emerge , for example : if i want to declare 2 defenders and the first is 1 hit point unit , the phase cannot interrupt so he can be killed according to the rule (if a unit has damage equal to hit points in this case 0=0 ), he would be killed before i finish the phase (declare defenders), so i guess assign damage is one phase in witch all effects and power going to the pool are simultaneously . You seem to have no idea what constant effect is. It doesn't interrupt anything.

Lafi said: Can forced march be used to move a battlefield/kingdom/quest zone only unit to another zone? "Note that this keyword only restricts the card when it enters play, it can then be moved (through card effects) to another zone." Lafi said: can a hero unit be moved to another zone which already has a hero? No.

Cain_hu said: These are two different effetcs on a single card, which happens after each other... it's obvibius from the card text. So, "Infiltrate!" first effect include two different effects, right? 1. At the beginning of your turn, discard the top X cards from each opponent's deck. Now, how can you perform this "effect"? Please tell me. It is obvious for you, right? 2. X is the number of resource tokens on this quest. Now, this "effect" is kinda weird.

chaosvt said: it works like 2: because of the period between the two sentences on the card. Nonsense. Effect must be read as a whole.

Bongo said: Can characters with keyword "immune to character abilities" defend against Stannis while player has no Lord characters? No. Stannis affects player, so cards immunity doesn't help here. Bongo said: Are Warlock's Servitors (core set) immune to Feral Pack ability and don't loose their deadly? Correct.

ktom said: But Red Vengeance specifically cancels the determination of challenge winner, so it can only be played in Step 2a. Hmmm. Shouldn't be step 2b? As I read, It cancels claim (Martell player is still losing challenge).

naizen said: It's a shame you talk about a German style in this way. I think it's misunderstanding. Lars said "germane" not "German".

No. It has magical word "cancel".

ktom said: a) and b) are the exact same thing. ... They cannot be separated. Yeah, that was not my intention - this was more like "moves" in my mind ktom said: As for the actual question, d) happens first. That's what I thought. And probably this was the original question.

I'm not sure if dormouse responded to my post or above one, but I tried to say something like this: a) I play "Lords of the Narrow Sea" b) I kneel noble character to force an opponent to reveal a new plot card c) opponent reveals plot card with lower income than mine, and with "when revealed" effect now what is first? d) or e) ? d) I claim 1 power for my House e) "when revealed" effect of the plot is resolved

ktom said: 1. Regardless of card type, if the declarative statement is part of a continuous effect (e.g., "skip the Taxation phase this round" or "ignore all out-of-House gold penalties"), the implied "you" of the declaration is plural. It applies to all players. So, Treaty with the Isles "Ignore the out of House gold penalty on all HG cards." applies to all players? Interesting.

DB_Cooper said: If it was referred to you, you'd have read: "YOU skip the taxation phase, this round". It's not that simple for new players For example: "draw a card" - it's reffered to you even though there is no "you". Also, there is The Viper's Revenge: "The winner of each challenge may choose to have all players skip the standing phase this round.", and it doesn't help either.

I don't know for sure but I can guess that it will be similar. Since "Locked away" has 19 number, that means no more characters for Martell. "Dorne" is 31, so beyond this number should be some other House cards and neutral and plots.

On the third page is link to shortcut keys.

LetsGoRed said: I think I just figured out how to do it, sorta. If you would read previous posts, maybe you could save time BTW: F5/8 don't work for me. It's not a problem, because you can use ctrl or mouse to group of cards, but I'm curious why.