ktom said: I'm guessing you were wondering if this would be a tricky way to move a card from your opponent's dead pile to their discard pile. Yes. I was overthinking maybe this card attaches at the same time or something. It won't hurt to ask.

Any Phase: Bring Jaqen H'ghar out of Shadows by paying the rest of his cost to choose 1 non-Army character in an opponent's dead pile that was killed this phase, and attach it to Jaqen H'ghar as a duplicate. Jaqen H'ghar gains the printed text, base STR, icons, traits and crests of that card. If that duplicate leaves play, return Jaqen H'ghar to Shadows. Let's say that because of claim 2, two characters are in opponent's dead pile. I come out of Shadows with Jaqen and then I come out of Shadows with second copy of Jaqen. I'm not sure what happens now.

Some people have 6 decks anyway, but some play only one, favorite house. So I don't think such tournament will be played often. But the idea is fun I think.

the1andonlime said: There is a misprint that can potentially impact the game. I don't think this is a problem for anyone. Come on. Sandsnake (Snakeskin Veil) is not Sand Snake? And Thundering Cavalry's ability don't work because of typo?

nikotina said: Superior Claim's wording says "claim 2 power for your House." I'm still able to use this even if I have "no House affiliation" because of the Neutral Faction House card, right? Yes. You have no House affiliation, but you still have House (at least in game term).

Jalabhar is from Clash of arms. Anyway such typo is no problem in game. As for Myrcella, he's talking about her name. If I remember correctly she's Lannister from mother side of throne succession. In Dorne things are different.

boben_fett said: This sounds a little dumb now that I'm thinking about it, but I'll ask anyway. I have the Lord Commander title and an opponent does a military challenge at me. Can I let it go unopposed and then re-direct the against myself and defend it so I can win and steal a power from the attacker? "When an opponent is attacked by another opponent"

mischraum.de said: Is it possible to attach a character to Jory Cassel that is already in my dead pile? Duplicates have no title.

nikotina said: And what's the deal with Myrcella LANNISTER? I might be wrong but she's Dornish queen.

Sluggonics said: I suspect FFG will allocate resources accordingly. But I suppose that is the optimistic view. It wouldn't surprise me, that licence says about 1 card game. Besides, it's impossible - they already named it as "SW the card game". Another card game would be confusion for customers. So I think it's epic fail and there's no turning back. Time will tell.

Fieras said: paid 96 dollars (not including airfare and hotel) 96 dollars just for entry to Gencon?

Sluggonics said: I believe it's one reason that Arkham Horror is their best-selling game. But it's board game, not card game with monthly packs to buy, right? Sluggonics said: So it seems inevitable that we'll see a head-to-head Star Wars LCG somewhere down the line. You are very optimistic person. Another game that needs proper testing?

rings said: I would still bet in the two years of operations, they had more revenues than any five year period of aGoT...because it is Star Wars. Unfortunately we cannot verify this, right? But you know, I think George doesn't sell SW licence cheap. rings said: And then people realized they used dice in a CCG I think the same will happen here. People will realize that's simply playing solitaire. BTW I invented new LCG co-op game. You can play with 2 persons or 4, you can even play with 7! Here's how it works: you throw a dice. If it's 1,2 or 3 then you carry on (I call it "beating a scenario"). If it's 4+ then you lose. rings said: I heard it was so popular, they had to change Star Wars to co-op 1/2 of the way through Assuming it's true, obviously this decision has nothing to do with popularity of LotR? Obviously it sells so well, because of co-op format, and NOT because of property, right? IF that's true, then I don't understand this world any longer.

rings said: Being playtested in a small amount will keep 95% of the competative players, and 100% of the casual players. Ah, so that's why we have poor playtesting. Now I understand. As for SW, I guess Wizards version made tons of $$ too?

rings said: Remember, playtesting a ton doesn't make much money for FFG What if game becomes irritating enough to be abandoned by players? I may be wrong, but I think selling AGOT is much money for FFG. rings said: Making a new Star Wars LCG does Well, we will see. Besides, is that mean that SW will not be tested properly too? It's SW after all! It will sell anyway, even with zero playtesting, right?

So Ratatoskr's intuition was correct.

Ratatoskr said: ~Besides, who's playing Bastard in Hiding, really? Beginners? Most probably Threat from the north was revealed.

Ratatoskr said: BTW - how did your friend get Loyal Guard on a noble-crested character with STR 2? There's no Bara or Neutral one. Bastard in Hiding?

widowmaker93 said: Rogue30 said: Ah, so you say that our playtesters really didn't try? I can imagine that with the LCG release cycle and the tons and tons of cards that are in the environment right now that the limited amount of time that the playtesters have it's making it increasingly hard to test the new sets. This is one place where a rotation schedule would benefit AGoT. But we all know that rotating sets out sucks so just disregard that statement. Tons? 1000+ cards? Come on. Besides, usually you just need to look at 1 new card and you know something is wrong. The truth is, FFG make poor designing and testing. It's FFG fault, not our playtesters. I'm sure playtesters, just like other players find the best cards/combos quickly, if not immediately. Look at the top of this page - "Leading publisher of board, card, and roleplaying games" - yeah, right. And they don't have money to test properly? They don't have enough people to avoid mistakes, poor wordings (see new Tyrion), and rules confusion or lack of rules? (How many years must I wait to be sure that I can play an action before a challenge during epic phase? BTW If I don't know, then playtesters probably also don't know, and if playtesters don't know the rules, then how can they test anything properly?) But hey, they have money and people to make SW LCG and LotR LCG. Isn't that great? I really hope that Lanni box will be the last. Seems to me that all evil happened when they started to work on deluxe expansions (and Nate on other LCGs) - no wonder that "limited time" is a problem. People compare Magic to AGOT, but the main difference is that Wizards care about their leading game, and AGOT is just one of many FFG games.

rings said: Personally I think if you can't find some broken combos or even infinate combos with either the chains (after all the packs are released) or Prince's Plan's...well, you really are not trying. Ah, so you say that our playtesters really didn't try?

Saturnine said: You only have to be able to successfully initiate the effect (be able to pay all the associated costs) to trigger it. Just remember you have to have legal target (if word "choose" exists).

Dread318 said: is there somewhere online that has a list of every card? Use database. You can find some links at the bottom of support page. There is also agotcards.org. Or you can click my signature.

Underworld40k said: I've been reading the rules and FAQ to try and establish exactly what a triggered effect is. (3.6) Triggered Effects Any effect that a player chooses to execute is considered a "triggered effect." Thus any effect that begins with a "Phase:" or "Response:" is a triggered effect. Also note that playing an event card is thus considered a triggered effect. Underworld40k said: Our assumption is that the event cards would not be valid but valar would be. Are we correct in this? Yes.

FAQ page 8 (3.8): Any effect that blanks a card's text box is assumed to blank that card's printed text box.

pianoplayer3991 said: So could I choose Stannis to settle the claim but then still save him? Yes. pianoplayer3991 said: Does that mean that once the card is on the table that it cannot NEVER be killed or discarded by any means? No. Compare him to Beric. But you are right, that you cannot even try to discard Knight of the Rainwood or kill/discard Beric. This is important for example when you have noble characters and there is currently revealed plot The Power of Blood. Then, you must choose for military claim some other, non-noble character.