Jump to content

Jareth Valar

Members
  • Content Count

    578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jareth Valar

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 07/23/1971

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    -
  • MSN
    -
  • Website URL
    http://-
  • ICQ
    -
  • Yahoo
    -
  • Skype
    -

Profile Information

  • Location
    Havelock, North Carolina, United States

Recent Profile Visitors

1,131 profile views
  1. I for one have (and continue to) support Sturn's stuff. We've been using it for quite a while now. It seems like it's got lots of fiddly bits, but it's surprisingly easy to use after you actually get to it.
  2. Current main ship for the group is a sil 5 Loronar medium freighter. Based off of the Smoking Blaster from old WEG stuff.
  3. Personally, I'd go with Squadrons. Like you said, it's more involving for the PC's. It is their story. In my game, I have a large battle set up where I plan on using both. Squadrons for the PC's and having the players help control the flow of battle through Mass Combat. Give them a bit more investment and immersion. Maybe something to consider, at least for a future encounter.
  4. RAW, no. It, like cover, grants defense. It has been a house rule at my table for a very long time that cover increases defense.
  5. True. Unfortunate thing about sense though...if it were actually common, we'd see allot more of it. 😉
  6. My thing with this is, that's pretty much a given in any and every RPG out there, not just this one. I totally agree, the GM away has that right, though not every GM chooses to exercise that right. I prefer to examine what is listed per the rules in these circumstances because I have always considered the GM Fiat as an obvious given. 🤷
  7. There is a talent that provides a character and a number of allies within range extra Soak is they are in cover. In that instance, definitely otherwise, as others have said, RAW says no.
  8. I also have been doing exactly this for quite a while for exactly the same reason.
  9. Lol. Now THAT'S an epic meeting of pot and kettle.
  10. That's actually funny. So they now have a "standard" Fang fighter now? With stats and all?
  11. Which is the direct result of a failed attack roll (or successful). Your claim was that there was no way to cause damage to an enemy on a failed attack roll. You were proven wrong on that statement. And as such, you are attempting to narrow your parameters. LOL Truly and totally pathetic. Tramp, You are absolutely right in everything you say..in your own mind. Enjoy your headspace, because noone else here does.
  12. Not all of them are area of effect. And since you love to argue mechanical RAW as you see them, there is no Blast effect to trigger. You can't say that it's effectively a Blast effect when the rules don't give it the Blast quality. I think I'm going to narrate something in my next session that a failed attack ricocheted off of the bad guys armor (due to Defense) and hit a computer terminal near by causing damage to the bad guy. JUST FOR YOU! In one post you argue your strict interpretation of things and the next you argue the effective semantics of things. I'd say you'd make a good politician, but I don't want to be that insulting to politicians.
  13. They couldn't be triggered if the character didn't attack. Hitting the power conduit beside an opponent and using Advantage to cause it to explode is the direct result of an attack. Narratively. the bolt missed the target (an attack, dummy) and hit something else which, luckily (due to advantage and/or triumph) caused damage to the originally missed target. Geeze, you're a freeking idiot. You will try and twist anything and everything to keep from being "wrong" and the only thing you do is show everyone you're not even worth conversing with, much less gaming with. I truly feel for anyone who has to tolerate your presence much less a conversation with you.
  14. I narrate how i see fit, as per the guidelines given for narration. I refuse to stick my head up my @$$ like you when it comes to this game. As for the soldiers charts for advantage, yes, it's an environmental effect that causes the damage, but it's an attack roll that the advantage comes from. So, whether the shot missed but caused damage by exploding a terminal it the player decided to do so with a successful attack because his weapon is to wee weak to do anything normally it's entirely up to them. How you want to interpret things for you is all well and good. You don't get to tell others they are wrong in how they run their game.
×
×
  • Create New...