Jump to content

salamar_dree

Members
  • Content Count

    758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by salamar_dree


  1. Genesys:

    Difficulty of Sil 4 Ship at Speed 4: RPPP

    Difficulty of Sil 3 Ship at Speed 5: RRP

    Star Wars:

    Difficulty of Sil 4 Ship at Speed 4: RRPP

    Difficulty of Sil 3 Ship at Speed 5: RRPPP

    So, it's actually harder to make many Piloting checks in Star Wars.

    .

    Regardless, there should always be Setbacks, because most checks only need to be made in dangerous situations (yes, there is Skilled Jockey to remove those Setbacks).

    .

    As a GM, I've allowed Piloting in place of Stealth to try and hide, so there are other uses.

    .

    Also, I've seen YYYYYGBPPP checks fail... 


  2. @EliasWindrider

    Finished the Airspeeders!

    Suggestions:

    1) I believe that you were considering tweaking the Ion Turbine Engine to provide Def 0, but add an additional +1 Def in 1 Zone mod.

    2) Add a note about Passengers in the "Frame Template Profiles" section to the effect of:

    "The Passenger Capacity entries list a maximum, unmodified capacity based on the Frame type at it's default Silhouette. This can be modified by various effects throughout the design process. However, the designer may always opt to assign a lower Passenger Capacity to a vehicle."

    This will simplify many vehicles!

    Lowering Passenger Capacity isn't beneficial by nature, so spending Advantage on it seems silly.

    Cheers!


  3. This sounds like time for the Mass Combat rules. You set a number of rounds for the goal you have.

    You have the PCs engage the TIE/ln's, and if they wipe out those fighters, then when you roll the first round of Mass Combat, then the effects of the PCs encounter will remove the Boost provided by those TIEs.

    Then you have one PC roll the Mass Combat check. You narrate the results of that round.

    Then run another PC encounter. Maybe they spot the Bombers, and have to take them out.

    Run the 2nd round of Mass Combat, influenced by the PC's actions and the results of the 1st round of Mass Combat. Have a different PC make the roll.

    Rinse and repeat.

    For all it's faults, the Module "Friends Like These" has a good Mass Combat in it.

    @venkelos


  4. A Characteristic of 1 is "below average". 2 is average. From a "D&D" perspective, 10 is average.

    As for "broken", Characteristics aren't broken above 5, but they do make things very unpredictable.

    I have a player that can boost as high as 7 in a few characteristics for an encounter. Makes it hard to judge how to challenge him.

    In another game, there's a character with a 6 Agility. He rarely misses with his rifle, but when he does, the result is often 10 Advantage, which becomes difficult to deal with.

    I would prefer the cap to be lower.

    In your own game, there's nothing from stopping you from running it with no cap, but as been pointed out, should any PC be as strong as a Rancor? Even with cybernetics?


  5. The HA-5 Aerial Retreat has a max altitude of 10 km.

    Other than an Enc of 250 RAW, it has a 260 Enc.

    Everything else lines up (I did switch the wait staff from crew to passengers, as they aren't "essential" to the retreat's operation, and are listed as "up to").

    Edit: 

    Now that I think of it, 2 new defects for the Frame table might work:

    1 Threat: Low Ceiling (Air Speeder only: The vehicle's Max Altitude is reduced to 10 km)

    3 Threat: Very Low Ceiling (Air Speeder only: The vehicle's Max Altitude is reduced to 1 km)


  6. The Ubrikkian TRL-03 Skyclaw is pretty close (1030 Enc vs 1000 Raw), except for Altitude: the Skyclaw only has a 1000 meter max Altitude RAW.

    The default Air Speeder max is 100 km.

    It has to be an Air Speeder, as it's Sil 5 (3×Larger Scope).

    Maybe a defect that reduces Altitude?

    Or maybe nothing special. I feel one could always reduce things like altitude.

    I did a bunch of manipulation to get the Passengers to exactly 2. It worked, but it seems that you could just say, "It's got less passenger space".

    Just mentioning it. I'm not sure if any changes are necessary.

    Cheers!

     

×
×
  • Create New...