Jump to content

any2cards

Members
  • Content Count

    2,195
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About any2cards

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 07/06/1941

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    -
  • MSN
    -
  • Website URL
    http://-
  • ICQ
    -
  • Yahoo
    any2cards@yahoo.com
  • Skype
    -

Profile Information

  • Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. any2cards

    Terrinoth Expanded Project (TEP)

    Thank you. This is exactly what I was looking for !
  2. any2cards

    Terrinoth Expanded Project (TEP)

    Would it be possible to get access to all of the individual cards directly, so that I don't have to spend time creating them from the PDFs?
  3. any2cards

    New expansion wanted

    I like the idea ... I just wonder how it will play out ... Especially with heroes with an Awareness of 1 ... it could be extremely difficult to get rid of ... I would be concerned of a NPE because of it. Thinking of Rendiel, Challara, Alys Raine, Grisban the Thirsty, and Sir Valadir. A value of 1 only has a 4 out of 36 chance of passing (11%). Not to mention the plethora of heroes with an Awareness of 2, which only has an 8 out of 36 chance of passing (22%). Obviously, the majority of Heroes that are Scouts will have little trouble passing. I will be interested to see what actual play testing finds ... EDIT: I actually wonder, thematically, if it would make more sense for it to be a miss on an X, 2, and 3 if your attack is ranged, but perhaps just a miss on an X and 2 if your attack is melee (it should be easier to hit something blinded when you are adjacent to it). And perhaps it is a miss only on an X if you have Reach. Just a thought.
  4. any2cards

    D2e Companion Card Viewer

    Godfather Quote: "Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in !!!" Thanks to @Xyphistor, I have corrected several misspellings within the Index of Useful Links under the Community Campaigns & Quests section. Thanks to @Xyphistor, I have edited the D2e Community Wiki link within the Index of Useful Links under the Wikipedia section. Thanks to @Xyphistor, I have made the D2e Card Viewer work with the D2e Community Wiki page (Psymia's version). Hmmm ... I am starting to see a trend here. I think I am going to have to make an offer to @Xyphistor that he can't refuse ... 😝 Now I am going to pass work onto @Psymia, as these issues have tilted me forever. On your wiki page, under the monster's category, you list Dispossessed. The D2e Card Viewer does not work on this because the actual monster name is The Dispossessed. Please fix me. In addition, under the Lieutenants section, Ardus Ix'Erebus is using some character other than the normal "apostrophe" (between the "Ix" and the "E"), so the D2e Card Viewer does not work. Please fix me. 🤣 Note: Psymia, I should point out that the above two issues also exist on the original Wiki page. I assume you probably did some form of fork, import, transfer, etc., so those issues just followed. EDIT: Forgot to mention that you will need to update the D2e Card Viewer to version 1.11.0 to see it work with the D2e Community Wiki page.
  5. any2cards

    D2e Companion Card Viewer

    A new version (1.10.0) of the D2e Card Viewer has been posted. It now works on the Descent Second Edition wiki page shown above.
  6. any2cards

    D2e Companion Card Viewer

    Yes. It supports every physical card that exists in all expansions.
  7. any2cards

    Descent First Edition Custom Quests

    Since I receive weekly requests for the D1e quests I have collected, it will be easier to simply post the information I provide here: Below, you will find a link to the D1e custom quests that I have. Please understand several things about these quests: I did not create any of these quests Some of the quests were written by individuals whose primary (first) language was not English, so the English does not read very well. Some of the quests are very well balanced and play well. Some, not so much. Some of the quests do not include all of the information you need (some are missing Treachery counts, treasure chest contents, etc.). As I have over 1,000+ hours playing as Overlord, I was able to adjust to these situations. Hopefully, you can as well. My recommendation to your Overlord would be to read the entire quest in advance multiple times, looking at the map at the same time, and make sure everything you need is there and you understand how it will play. Adjust for missing information as you see fit. D1e Quests Enjoy.
  8. any2cards

    Index of Useful Links

    Done. Thanks for pointing it out.
  9. While I am not overly concerned about this issue, I think many people are missing the point. The OP has stated that the rules that have been put into place by FFG to deal with the issue (whether or not you feel it is one), are insufficient to actually address what FFG is trying to prevent. The OP then provides examples of how it could be dealt with better, and solicits feedback on his ideas. Personally, I think your ideas are a good start, and address the issue better than FFG's approach. I always hate it when decisions are left to subjective determination by someone who is presumably very busy already ...
  10. any2cards

    Allies & Mercenaries 2nd ed. format beta (Quick Update)

    Just curious, but is there anyway of looking at this (the links) without logging in?
  11. any2cards

    Alphabet Squadron (new SW novel)

    Star Wars fans literally have no idea how to use the word literally correctly.
  12. You guys REALLY need to get some help ... 😂😋😝 This on-going non-reality fantasy across multiple threads that has many of you thinking that we will ever see new physical D2e content, and then talking about it ad nauseam, and then extrapolating every little hidden hint to back up the claim ... well ... it gave me a good laugh this morning. Well Done. Now, go get some help ... LOL
  13. Perhaps you should re-read the threads to which I was replying. I never stated that X-Wing 1.0, 2.0, etc. wasn't a good game. I said the app was extremely poorly designed, with little to no testing. After all, what kind of testing could exist with all of the problems the app has. That was all I was trying to state. And I CAN state that without playing the game. Now, it is entirely possible that I was not clear enough in my posts to make my point clear. That happens when you are 77 years old and heavily medicated. I will attempt to be clearer in the future. Edit: Here was my original response: I don't play the game, but have a massive collection. I have been here since the beginning. And I can't agree more to the statement above. "Disappointed" would be a weak adjective to describe my feelings if I actively played. They have had more than a year to get this app reasonably functional. What they have delivered is a joke. And that is me being polite about it. There is no defense for this. This is especially true considering the fact that playing 2.0 is MOSTLY wrapped around using this app. Now we have poor app testing to go along with poor play testing. This does not place FFG in a very good light. As you can see, my comments were directed at the app, not the game.
  14. I don't have to actually play the game to recognize poor design when it comes to ships, actions, cards, etc. Just like you wouldn't have to drive a car running on rims alone to know that it would be a poor, ineffective design. All it ever takes is an understanding of the game, how it is played, the mechanics, the rules, etc. This is the PRECISE reason why people on this forum can recognize poor design from teased and/or leaked info, way before it ever makes the tables.
  15. I don't play the game, but have a massive collection. I have been here since the beginning. And I can't agree more to the statement above. "Disappointed" would be a weak adjective to describe my feelings if I actively played. They have had more than a year to get this app reasonably functional. What they have delivered is a joke. And that is me being polite about it. There is no defense for this. This is especially true considering the fact that playing 2.0 is MOSTLY wrapped around using this app. Now we have poor app testing to go along with poor play testing. This does not place FFG in a very good light.
×