Jump to content

Bad Birch

Members
  • Content Count

    132
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

About Bad Birch

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    -
  • MSN
    -
  • Website URL
    -
  • ICQ
    -
  • Yahoo
    -
  • Skype
    -

Profile Information

  • Location
    Totnes, Devon, United Kingdom
  1. MILLANDSON said: Now now, children - why don't we all just sit down and relax? It's a **** game, you shouldn't be getting this worked up about it. Hell, I'm a graduate with a degree in each of Politics and Law, and if I can manage to not post about "our economy is rubbish, and THEY TOOK OUR JEEEERBS!" (I love South Park! ), I'm pretty sure everyone else can too. This forum isn't the place for it, so if you could take political or nationalistic rants elsewhere, it'd be appreciated. Anyways - On Topic for a moment! I've heard that it is meant to be getting into the UK either for the 6th September, or the 13th. I hope that you weren't trying to patronise me, as I was writing ironically. I don't put smileys in my text to flag up when I am placing my tongue in my cheek. I respect your posts by the way, and am generally interested in what you have to say about the game(s). I have a degree in philosophy on the one hand, but run my own building company on the other so I come across right wing views on a regular basis- some more extreme than others, all should be challenged.
  2. flyingcircus said: Sorry but I have too many relatives outta work as it is, mainly because of the BS that companies like FFG are doing by overseas production, when this stuff could have easily of been produced right here. May be a bit political, I just calls it as I see's it. What about publishing it in the UK? Bloody GW put a lot of Brits out of jobs by selling the licence to a bunch of septic tanks. For the sake of all that is holy, blame the sh*tty state of your economy on the banks like everyone else, not minority games companies. Why not write a letter to Obama, he may be the only person on earth who can get you Black Crusade faster. p.s. When you write BS it is still swearing.
  3. How do you deal with absent players? Sometimes players can't make a session. We all have a life to lead and sometimes this interferes with once a week gaming sessions, so sometimes it is an unavoidable problem. Sometimes, this can really screw up an ongoing plot- especially when it comes to "cliffhangers" left over from previous weeks. What are the ingenious methods you have employed to get around key players' absence?
  4. Hardcore Heathen said: Blood Pact said: When it comes to spelling and grammar, honestly, a lot of the companies seem to get sloppy with them now and then. The only one who really doesn't have to worry about it is Wizards. And Wizards is owned by Hasbro, who have so much money they can afford to run its pen and paper games at a loss if it has/wants to (maintaining the IP for when there's a resurgence), and just needs to throw money at any problems it comes up against, of which spelling and grammar are fairly minor. Now I'm not saying that I don't want FFG to get things a bit tidier, but overall I'm satisfied with their product. You can't let the perfect be the enemy of the adequate. Except basic spell and grammar checking isn't something that costs a lot of money. A goodly number of these errors could simply be fixed by using the basic spellcheck feature in Word for an hour or two. (Sure, you initially get a lot of false positives for things like lasrifle, but spellcheck does *not* take long.) These are the sorts of errors that people get flamed for when the errors are made in terribly thought-out gay fanfiction. There is absolutely no excuse for their prevalence in a product of professional nature that is sold for profit. And there should be an element of pride to it. I wince every time I come across a spelling/grammar error, and I feel bad showing certain portions of the books to my playgroup because the errors look so unprofessional. I'm not even talking about making the rules text more mechanically smooth in nature (I realize that not everyone can meet the standards of specificity that Magic: the Gathering has spoiled me with); I'm referring to simple basics. Even allowing for unfamiliarity with UK English (armour and such) there's simply a preponderance of such errors. What's with the "gay" thing? Cut it out mate.
  5. Graver said: Replicant253 said: Pretty much agree with this, the published DH adventures have been a mixed bag and IMO even the good ones have only been good because i have adapted them. Edge of Darkness and House of Dust and Ash have been the best. Having a go at people for being down on them is a little harsh because i think in general they deserve the criticism. The 40K line really deserves a classic adventure like the Enemy Within or Masks of Nyarlathotep to be written for it to ensure its place in the pantheon of great RP games. Fingers crossed it is on the horizon. You speak my mind! I wish Mr. Bligh would do some more adventures for DH. He seems to know good game design. Those of us who criticize a lot of the scenario books for Dark Heresy don't do it out of hatred or malice for the line. Quite the opposite. We do it because we really love Dark Heresy and the 40k universe. But seeing a lot of these scenarios such as Black Sepulchre is like having a brilliant gifted genius level kid who just smokes pot all day and writes his papers ten minuets before they're due. There's just so much potential that is being utterly waisted. One of the major problems I've noticed with the DH scenarios is the rather heavy handed rail-roading. I don't know why so many DH adventure books insist on having these A -> B -> C plot set-ups as it seems incredibly amateurish, especially for any kind of game with one foot in the mystery game genre. The hobby has been around for a while and there have been plenty of work and breakthroughs made in the horror, mystery, and epic (the three things the DH scenario books seem to want to go for) scenario design over the past 30-odd years. If nothing else, Masks of Nyarlathotep shows us that you can indeed have a mystery/horror series of adventures of epic proportion and consequences -scenarios where there is no ABC plot design and what a player chooses to do actually matters in the end. Of all the problems with the current shape of DH adventures, the fact that player choice has very little effect on the over all plot as presented is the worst and it just keeps happening. To fix that problem, you pretty much just have write a whole adventure your self and if you're doing that, why use the book at all? When the Haarlock trilogy started, people would want the book without the desire to run the adventure or not think too much of heavily rewriting it from the ground up because it came with a lot more. If the story and set-up for the scenario was sub-par, there was at least some great setting information in the form of gazetteers which would spawn additional or different ideas and make the books worth while. That seems to be fading away as well. It's starting to look like the only reason to buy these books would be for a poorly implemented rail road which would take a GM like me about as long to rewrite into something usable as it would to simply write up something from scratch. In other words, there's no real incentive left to buy these books. That coupled with the fact that we know it can be so much more if it just tried (and keep hoping with each book that it will be the magic golden egg) is infuriating. It's like that genius gifted kid is smoking pot 24-7 now and realized he doesn't even need to turn in any more papers to get a C out of the course, and that's still passing, so why try. In a setting and game genre proven to be capable of so much, why should we be complacent and happy with mediocrity at best and "holy crap, what the hell is this?!" at worse? It sure as heck doesn't do the thing we love any justice and, in the end, can only hurt it -something none of us wants to see Couldn't have put it better. DH is supposed to be CoC in space, isn't it?
  6. Lightbringer said: Adam France said: Setting detail is usually the primary reason I buy new stuff. Me too. That stuff is like fried crack for me! Mmmmm... In batter... I love fridays!
  7. Brolthemighty said: If you enjoy that style of play, then by all means. However when discussing income and gearing, not to mention the theme of the responses that have been given, using the Scum table when compared to others is in fact a worse choice. Why worse? Explain.
  8. Brolthemighty said: So, unlike the others from earlier in the thread, you two actually use ONLY the income chart....or worse yet, have them use the Scum income chart and make the skimp and scrounge for everything? No, I let them use the scum income chart and then let them 'discover' equipment and cash. Other times I ruin them so they don't have any money at all. I resent the fact that you think this is worse, when really it is merely different and suits the way we play DH.
  9. Luddite said: To answer the OP question, no i don't. In fact, i think this new Dredd image it much closer to Carlos Esquerra's original designs for Joe Dredd - before the 1980's mega shoulder pads kicked off.. I like this new Dredd incarnation and i'm looking forwards to the movie. Glad you think so, Carlos Esquerra is definitely the god father when it comes to 2000ad.
  10. My group has a more traditional set up. The excuse is that they are in an a fairly constant state of undercover operations, so have to operate more or less like scum, generating their own income in the process. Some of the adventures end up being as much about getting cash as burning heretics! I don't feel the way that acolytes operate lends itself to a monthly salary. If you spend a lot of time in warp transit, your party can come out the other end minted up. On the other hand if they only get paid for mission time that can lead to a sense of being underpaid, as often adventures can last for mere days of in game time.
  11. N0-1_H3r3 said: Bad Birch said: p.p.s I care less about the size of the helmet and more that they make him keep the bloody thing on, for drokks sake. Karl Urban (best known for his roles as Eomer in The Lord of The Rings, and Dr Leonard "Bones" McCoy in Star Trek), who's playing Dredd, has gone on record to state that he's been a fan of the character since he was a kid, and he wouldn't be working on the movie if the character ever removed his helmet (at least, that's what the latest Empire magazine says). Let's hope so! I have some hopes for the film, it has an Alex Garland script which is a good sign in my opinion.
  12. One of my players and good friend, Jock, did the costume designs and some concepts for the new film. I am such a name dropper! He is a long time comic artist and currently works for DC comics but started out as a 2000ad artist. Look him up on wikipedia. I find some of the comments on how the new stuff works (or doesn't) very interesting indeed. We talked about the helmet issue one day, as this he felt would be the thing that would divide the officianados more than anything else. Yes, the classic arbite does look a lot like Dredd, probably for the reasons already given in the thread, however I would think of it as imitation being the highest form of flattery- there is, after all, nothing new under the sun... I remember hoping that Clint Eastwood would finally be cast as Dredd in the most perfect film ever, bearing in mind that the original character of Dredd was based on Dirty Harry, and named after a Prince Buster track. p.s. Did you know that Sylvester Stallone's helmet was too small to put on and off like a conventional one and had to be taken apart in two sections? That's how they got around the issue on that production... p.p.s I care less about the size of the helmet and more that they make him keep the bloody thing on, for drokks sake.
  13. Adeptus-B said: To supplement my earlier critiques: I just borrowed and read Maggots In The Meat- I liked it! It's not terribly involved, but what do you expect from a small booklet? My only complaint is that it is pitched as an "introductory" adventure- wrong! I doubt that a "standard" rookie party could survive the final conflict... And I picked up Damned Cities and read about half of it. So far, so good... Totally agree, MitM was a good little scenario. I like it better when the story unfolds , though, so generally I like to lose the whole "your Inquisitor is sending you to blahsville, population 20 trillion, go find the murderer" intros that these adventures have. Stumbling onto the horror is half the trick, for my style of GMing...
  14. Lightbringer said: Interesting, Adeptus-B... I wonder if the Dark Eldar use of weaponised black holes is something of a "shout out" to Star Trek, then? Given that the Dark Eldar are the closest thing in 40k to Romulans... There is nothing new under the sun, whether or not it implodes under its' own mass.
  15. gathrawny said: I would like to see a mechanic for DH characters falling into BC characters basically. Perhaps instead of Ascending there is a mechanic for them to fall to chaos and ascend along that route instead. [/quote Yeah, after healthy dose of corruption and insanity points aswell!
×
×
  • Create New...