Per the conversation on AGoTcards, Negotiations at the Great Sept is either bonkers or another failure of proofreading. Since my own meta's regional is not far out, and this card will be legal for it, can we get an official errata / ruling before hand?
" Intrigue Gambit, City. If you have no other City plots in your used pile, choose an opponent. You and that opponent may each choose to shuffle your hands of at least 1 card into your decks, and replace them with the top 5 cards of the same deck"
1. This has to be missing "When revealed" or "Any Phase" because, at face value, a player could infinitely activate this effect during the round. (essentially reading: if you have 1 card in your hand, shuffle it and then put any cards into play that you can afford, then keep a hand of 5 cards, at least 1 of which you want) true or false?
2. Assuming #1 is a mistake, "if you have no other City plots" statement must also be questioned. At face value, the wording implies that NaTGS's effect could possibly be duplicated by city of spiders. true false?