been perusing the Seekers of Knowledge card pool for the last month or so, and apart from the obvious need for Richard Pike to change his Action type, there are a couple of things that have set me to pondering, and was wondering what your take on them might be:
1 ) if Lucas Tetlow attempts to take control of a Support which he is not legal to play, what happens ? for example, attempting control of Lodge Defences with no Locations of his own, or Prize Pistol with no Agency to attach it to. when does the action become illegal ? is it a case of simply cannot, or if after paying would it fizzle and relegate the card to discard ?
2 ) probably a bit more self explanatory but would like some feedback on is the question of Ipiutak copying the effects of something like Unbound. say the opponent discards 2 cards to destroy a 2 Skill Character, could it then be used to destroy one of their 2 Skill Characters (exactly) ?
3 ) lets say you control Roald Ellsworth (who has a wound token) and Brette Wulffson. if Brette is returned to hand / destroyed, does Roald INSTANTLY die or does Brette leave first and allow Roald to Disrupt both the Explorers leaving play ?
4 ) and the BIG one, as this was played against me and i wasn't too sure on the ruling. that being Expert Testimony, and whether it can be used to 'commit' an exhausted Character into a story ?
that is all for now, but some more may arise as the old brain clicks over the inter-connectivity.