Jump to content



Photo

Request: Young Griff Errata


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 kr4ng

kr4ng

    Member

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 12:37 PM

I was wondering if any else out there besides me wants to get young griff errata'd so that you don't actually have to stand a character before bringing another card out of shadows?

I just think he would be more playable in certain types of city of shadows decks if this were the case.  

He is still ok either way, but I think it would be cool/nice if the next FAQ errata'd this card back to what I believe was the true intent of the card's designer.

 



#2 Totalgit

Totalgit

    Member

  • Members
  • 81 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 01:35 PM

After Young Griff comes out of Shadows, stand ANY number of characters you control.

 

Bolded the important bit. Im pretty sure you can use 0 for any number of characters?

 



#3 kr4ng

kr4ng

    Member

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 04:30 PM

Yeah you'd think that is how it should work would't you. 

But apparently it doesn't.  You have to actually stand something to bring another card out of shadows.  

What I don't understand is, why can't you choose to stand a character already standing, just like in cyvasse you can choose and kneel a character that is already kneeling?



#4 divinityofnumber

divinityofnumber

    Member

  • Members
  • 589 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 04:49 PM

Cyvasse has the text, "If able…"


Star Wars LCG: FFG EC Regional 2014 - Top 4; Star Wars LCG: FFG Event Center Store Championship 2014 - Top 4; FFG Event Center Season One 2014 - Minneapolis Regional Game Night - Top 4; May the 4th Be With You 2013 - Second Chance Tournament Champion; A Game of Thrones LCG: Days of Ice and Fire 2013 - Joust Top 16

abUse the Force author on CardGameDB.com


#5 kr4ng

kr4ng

    Member

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 05:28 PM

Yeah, if you are <able> to kneel a character with intrigue, you can still kneel one that is already kneeling even though I could actually accomplish the kneeling of a character.  So in effect players can ignore the if able on cyvasse, because they are able to do it, but can still kneel a character already kneeling.

if able in this argument doesn't really matter. but maybe I am missing something.



#6 Totalgit

Totalgit

    Member

  • Members
  • 81 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 09:28 PM

Hmm, i understand that text before then has to resolve before you can do the text after the then.

Surely if you choose 0 as the any number of characters the text before the then has been resolved  correctly because "Did any (0 in this case) characters stand?" Well yes any (0) characters stood so move on to after the then part.

As i chose 0 for any number then it makes the above statement true/yes right, if not im really confused and think that either any number needs be > 0 or um something.

 



#7 Saturnine

Saturnine

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,558 posts

Posted 09 December 2012 - 10:50 PM

Totalgit said:

Surely if you choose 0 as the any number of characters the text before the then has been resolved  correctly because "Did any (0 in this case) characters stand?" Well yes any (0) characters stood so move on to after the then part.

As i chose 0 for any number then it makes the above statement true/yes right, if not im really confused and think that either any number needs be > 0 or um something.

That's how I'd read it, too.



#8 dcdennis

dcdennis

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,376 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 02:00 AM

Until an errata comes, 0 is not included in 'any number'.

http://www.fantasyfl...&efpag=0#675488



#9 Bomb

Bomb

    Cool Person Club

  • Members
  • 1,758 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 03:18 AM

With the influx of cards like Long Lances, would it really be necessary to errata Young Griff?



#10 Ratatoskr

Ratatoskr

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,551 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 03:56 AM

dcdennis said:

Until an errata comes, 0 is not included in 'any number'.

http://www.fantasyfl...&efpag=0#675488

As ktom says in the thread you're linking to, 0 *is* included in "any number", but that's not the point. The point is that, to quote the FAQ, "If a card uses the word "then," then the preceding effect must have been resolved successfully for the subsequent dependent effect to be resolved." A standing effect cannot resolve successfully if no card is going from a kneeling to a standing position. Easy as that.

Also, the "if able" on Game of Cyvasse has nothing to do with this. If it wasn't there you could only play Game of Cyvasse if all players control at least one character with an INT icon. The "if able" gets around that. It has no bearing on the standing/kneeling situation.

You can choose a kneeling character for Game of Cyvasse, but since no actual kneeling happened (no character went from a standing to a kneeling position), you can't win the Game of Cyvasse.

Young Griff is a bit different, because there is no target (no word "choose") but the principle is the same. Technically, 0 is included in "any number", but if no card goes from a kneeling to a standing position, the pre-Then part of the effect is not successful, and the post-Then part doesn't happen.

As for the calls for an erratum - really? A 3-for-3 tricon with stealth who can stand your Street Waifs, Maesters and Lanni Kneel victims, and it's not good enough for you?



#11 Saturnine

Saturnine

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,558 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 04:20 AM

Ratatoskr said:

As for the calls for an erratum - really? A 3-for-3 tricon with stealth who can stand your Street Waifs, Maesters and Lanni Kneel victims, and it's not good enough for you?

So you will not be signing my petition to errata Meera to read "if Meera Reed would be killed or discarded from play, she goes into Shadows instead," I assume?

 

As for Young Griff, ktom's explanation makes sense, but it does irk me a little as one of those cases where a card invites you to think of having a certain intention behind the card effect that is not fulfilled by its text. Certainly, it's not exactly a deal breaker, but it does diminish the flavor of the card, imho.



#12 Ratatoskr

Ratatoskr

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,551 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 04:27 AM

Saturnine said:

So you will not be signing my petition to errata Meera to read "if Meera Reed would be killed or discarded from play, she goes into Shadows instead," I assume?

While you're at it fixing Meera, give her Deadly, make her STR 5 and add some power grab effect. Something like "claim 1 power for your house for every card blanked" or something. Might make her borderline playable, although I'm not sure.



#13 kr4ng

kr4ng

    Member

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 10 December 2012 - 05:22 AM

Some of you think errata is unecessary--and you may be right--I was only requesting it because in city of shadows decks that are not targ decks (i.e., don't have street waifs, or something else you can easily kneel in the marshalling phase), pulling young griff out in the challenge phase just isn't as good--and may be too pricey.

I know in targ decks you can get things in knelt, but without the use of flea bottom (which you would only run 1 of anyways and 1 young griff), a lot of other builds don't have the option.  Sure you could bring him out in the dominance phase and stand a dude and then bring out another shadows card, but that just invites a fat valar oppurtunity. 

tl;dr - He should be errata'd, it will make him more fun, and he still won't be as overpowered as other shadows cards such as a certain 2 str mil/int bicon in house stark.

 



#14 BBSB12

BBSB12

    Member

  • Members
  • 167 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 09:18 AM

Well, you either trust FFG's R&D or you don't. Because if we assume that they did a good job and card does what they wanted it to do (so that you need to have at least one knelt character to trigger), then there is no reason to errata it. Otherwise you can argue same thing (that cards will become more fun/more playable/suck less) about probably ~ 75% of the current card pool.



#15 Saturnine

Saturnine

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,558 posts

Posted 11 December 2012 - 10:39 PM

BBSB12 said:

Otherwise you can argue same thing (that cards will become more fun/more playable/suck less) about probably ~ 75% of the current card pool.

That's a gross overstatement. Of course, trying to infer the designer's intent is a tricky proposition. However, I think most people can agree that on over 99% of the cards, there is no difference between what the card does within the current rules and rulings and what you intuitively think it does. There is precedent for cards that have been errata'd that subsequently worked more like many people's intuitive understanding of how the card was meant to work when it was first released, but didn't.



#16 Penfold

Penfold

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,180 posts

Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:41 AM

But the sheer stat efficiancy of this card pretty much serves as a good indicator that this is in fact how the card is meant to be played.



#17 kr4ng

kr4ng

    Member

  • Members
  • 151 posts

Posted 14 December 2012 - 07:55 AM

Penfold said:

But the sheer stat efficiancy of this card pretty much serves as a good indicator that this is in fact how the card is meant to be played.

Well, I guess you of all people would know best.  /thread






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS