Jump to content



Photo

Edge of the Empire Beta Update: Final Week


  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 FFG_Sam Stewart

FFG_Sam Stewart

    Member

  • Members
  • 119 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 07:01 AM

 Hello, everyone! Here's the final update for the Edge of the Empire beta. 



#2 LethalDose

LethalDose

    Member

  • Members
  • 747 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 07:37 AM

 AF fixed.

Thank. God.

-WJL



#3 Ceodryn

Ceodryn

    Member

  • Members
  • 255 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:00 AM

Thanks for the final update!

I was wondering if it would be possible, at some point of time, to get the Final Update pdf in a black font version, i.e without the red fonts of the latest changes?

I am hoping (as I am sure others are) to print that final update, and patiently glue in in the beta book all changes, so that the beta book is fully and easily playable (and a nice addition to the upcoming beginner's box), until the core book comes out.

Thanks in advance
Cheers
Ceodryn



#4 Crimson_red

Crimson_red

    Member

  • Members
  • 40 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:16 AM

Ceodryn said:

Thanks for the final update!

I was wondering if it would be possible, at some point of time, to get the Final Update pdf in a black font version, i.e without the red fonts of the latest changes?

+1

I think I too could benefit from the effort.



#5 Jegergryte

Jegergryte

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,525 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 08:30 AM

I still preferred the challenge die version of auto-fire - but hey I can house-rule it :)

Nice job on the spread barrel - I assume that it means this provides a default blast 4 to a weapon - which can be modified to a total of 7, which is pretty beard.


Make sure your brain is engaged, before putting your mouth into gear.

"What about the future...? We can only hope, we cannot however account for the minutiae of the quanta, as all accidents in an infinite space are inevitable."

GMLovlie's/Jegergryte's Cubicle direct link to supplements here.


#6 Donovan Morningfire

Donovan Morningfire

    Looking for a saint? Look elsewhere.

  • Members
  • 3,054 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:04 AM

Jegergryte said:

Nice job on the spread barrel - I assume that it means this provides a default blast 4 to a weapon - which can be modified to a total of 7, which is pretty beard.

That's my reading of it.

As for the other updates, nice to see the vibro-weapons getting a bit of love, particularly the vibro-knife, making it a much superior weapon to the combat knife.  Also liking the changes to Bodyguard and Toughened as well as the "avoid death" ability of Nemesis-tier NPCs.


Dono's Gaming & Etc Blog - http://jedimorningfire.blogspot.com/

"You worry about those drink vouchers, I'll worry about that bar tab!"


#7 Venthrac

Venthrac

    Member

  • Members
  • 841 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 10:54 AM

Ceodryn said:

Thanks for the final update!

I was wondering if it would be possible, at some point of time, to get the Final Update pdf in a black font version, i.e without the red fonts of the latest changes?

I am hoping (as I am sure others are) to print that final update, and patiently glue in in the beta book all changes, so that the beta book is fully and easily playable (and a nice addition to the upcoming beginner's box), until the core book comes out.

Thanks in advance
Cheers
Ceodryn

Good suggestion, though I imagine the devs have probably got bigger fish to fry at the moment. Still, count me as a +1.



#8 LethalDose

LethalDose

    Member

  • Members
  • 747 posts

Posted 14 November 2012 - 03:27 PM

Donovan Morningfire said:

As for the other updates, nice to see the vibro-weapons getting a bit of love, particularly the vibro-knife, making it a much superior weapon to the combat knife.

Oh $h!t, I didn't even see the vibro weapon CR changes (not sure why the sword is in red, it was CR 2 already).  These are definitely a 'new breed' now, they provide a distinct advantage and alternative play-style to the ranged weapons.  Well done!

Provided we don't figure out a way to screw it up…

-WJL



#9 Jegergryte

Jegergryte

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,525 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 12:19 AM

LethalDose said:

Provided we don't figure out a way to screw it up…

We usually do… don't we?


Make sure your brain is engaged, before putting your mouth into gear.

"What about the future...? We can only hope, we cannot however account for the minutiae of the quanta, as all accidents in an infinite space are inevitable."

GMLovlie's/Jegergryte's Cubicle direct link to supplements here.


#10 Locksathy

Locksathy

    Member

  • Members
  • 59 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 07:24 AM

Overalll, Im very pleased with all the changes.  It started as a very good product and I think that it now as the potential to be a blockbuster. Best of luck to all the team and again, thank you for letting us be a small part of this great adventure.



#11 3WhiteFox3

3WhiteFox3

    Member

  • Members
  • 72 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 07:27 AM

 These changes are indeed awesome. I can't wait to print them out and see how they do in actual play. I'd like to thank the developers that allowed this open play-test to be possible, it's great to know that our opinions and ideas had a direct impact on how the final product will look.



#12 awayputurwpn

awayputurwpn

    Member

  • Members
  • 752 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 04:45 PM

Very very nice!  Vibro-weapons are now sick.

I'd like to point out a typo though…

Page 13: "The default reward is 15 XP for one session consisting of one to three major encounters and two to three minor encounters (note, these do not have to be combat encounters) is 15 XP."
 



#13 FFG_Sam Stewart

FFG_Sam Stewart

    Member

  • Members
  • 119 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 05:23 AM

 Ah, good catch. I'll make sure that doesn't make it into the final book "as is." 

Thanks!



#14 Ceodryn

Ceodryn

    Member

  • Members
  • 255 posts

Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:45 AM

Hi,

I have a question about the following changes:

  • Bounty Hunter (page 40): The Bounty Hunter loses Surveillance as a career skill and gains Brawl.
  • Gadgeteer (page 42): The Gadgeteer loses Surveillance as a career skill and gains Coerce.
  • Survivalist (page 43): The Survivalist loses Surveillance as a career skill and gains Medicine.

The Survivalist doesn't have Surveillance as a Bonus Career Skill (at least not in my book), and I am assuming it cannot be referring to Surveillance as a Career Skill since it fall under the Bounty Hunter changes.

If anyone could clarify, that'll be great. Thanks in advance!

Cheers
Ceodryn



#15 Donovan Morningfire

Donovan Morningfire

    Looking for a saint? Look elsewhere.

  • Members
  • 3,054 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 05:21 AM

Ceodryn said:

Hi,

I have a question about the following changes:

  • Bounty Hunter (page 40): The Bounty Hunter loses Surveillance as a career skill and gains Brawl.
  • Gadgeteer (page 42): The Gadgeteer loses Surveillance as a career skill and gains Coerce.
  • Survivalist (page 43): The Survivalist loses Surveillance as a career skill and gains Medicine.

The Survivalist doesn't have Surveillance as a Bonus Career Skill (at least not in my book), and I am assuming it cannot be referring to Surveillance as a Career Skill since it fall under the Bounty Hunter changes.

If anyone could clarify, that'll be great. Thanks in advance!

Cheers
Ceodryn

This got answered in a couple different places (including the Week 8 Update thread I believe), but for brevity's sake…

Survivalist should instead refer to the Scout specialization under the Explorer career.  Survivalist has no change to it's listed career skills.


Dono's Gaming & Etc Blog - http://jedimorningfire.blogspot.com/

"You worry about those drink vouchers, I'll worry about that bar tab!"


#16 doctorbadwolf

doctorbadwolf

    Member

  • Members
  • 25 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 08:58 AM

A lot of things about this game seem/are fun*, but my fears have been realized, and there just isn't any point in my group buying this game.

 

Specializations cost far too much. It's not about power gaming. It's about the set up of specializations not working for the types of characters we play. It's also about playing characters of various types that can actually fight, but that's a skill set up issue. Blaster pistols should be a skill for every single career.

The problem with the careers and specs in this game is that they are restricted in weird, counter intuitive, unexpected ways, and then have prohibitive costs associated with going around those restrictions.

Multi-specing in this game does not screw up the balance of the game. Mixing specs does not lead to characters that are more powerful than non mixed characters. There is literally no reason to hike up the cost. Further, having a fluctuating cost scale creates the same problem that multiclassed characters had in 3.5 DnD and it's derivitives when calculating skills. The math is complicated in ways that serve no good purpose. One has to take note of when one purchased each spec in order to simply double check their build math.

 

Basically, it's a system that feels in almost every way like it should have been truly "classless", but someone stubbornly refused to allow it.

 

No thank you.

This isn't a matter of not liking the style of game they're making, or it not being my sort of thing, etc. It's a matter of them screwing up their game. And now, for at least 5 years (if I remember the length of the license correctly) there won't be any new Star Wars RPG products worth purchasing for my group.

 

That's quite a bummer.

 

 

*Haven't played since around update 5 or 6, so there's some stuff I've not checked out first hand.



#17 Doc, the Weasel

Doc, the Weasel

    Pretending to be many, many things.

  • Members
  • 1,400 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 09:21 AM

doctorbadwolf said:

A lot of things about this game seem/are fun*, but my fears have been realized, and there just isn't any point in my group buying this game.

 

Specializations cost far too much. It's not about power gaming. It's about the set up of specializations not working for the types of characters we play. It's also about playing characters of various types that can actually fight, but that's a skill set up issue. Blaster pistols should be a skill for every single career.

The problem with the careers and specs in this game is that they are restricted in weird, counter intuitive, unexpected ways, and then have prohibitive costs associated with going around those restrictions.

Multi-specing in this game does not screw up the balance of the game. Mixing specs does not lead to characters that are more powerful than non mixed characters. There is literally no reason to hike up the cost. Further, having a fluctuating cost scale creates the same problem that multiclassed characters had in 3.5 DnD and it's derivitives when calculating skills. The math is complicated in ways that serve no good purpose. One has to take note of when one purchased each spec in order to simply double check their build math.

 

Basically, it's a system that feels in almost every way like it should have been truly "classless", but someone stubbornly refused to allow it.

 

No thank you.

This isn't a matter of not liking the style of game they're making, or it not being my sort of thing, etc. It's a matter of them screwing up their game. And now, for at least 5 years (if I remember the length of the license correctly) there won't be any new Star Wars RPG products worth purchasing for my group.

 

That's quite a bummer.

 

 

*Haven't played since around update 5 or 6, so there's some stuff I've not checked out first hand.

 

Man, I remember when it was pretty much understood that every RPG needed some houseruling to fit a group's tastes.

Now I guess having to make a simple change in XP cost disqualifies an entire line from even reaching the table. Rough times here.


Listen to my actual play podcasts at BeggingForXP.com.

 

Take a look at my Talent Trees (updated to include Dangerous Covenants), as well as my other handouts.


#18 Kallabecca

Kallabecca

    Member

  • Members
  • 685 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 10:40 AM

doctorbadwolf said:

Specializations cost far too much. It's not about power gaming. It's about the set up of specializations not working for the types of characters we play. It's also about playing characters of various types that can actually fight, but that's a skill set up issue. Blaster pistols should be a skill for every single career.

 

Since you admit that you haven't played with the later updates, then you're missing the fact that costs of Specializations and skills were reduced. In the case of skills, they were returned to the original cost (5*new rank for career, 5*new rank + 5 for non-career). So, the cost of getting blasters to rank 5 from nothing is about 25xp different for the careers that have it versus the careers that don't. A whopping 2 game sessions difference at most.

Cost of the specs were introduced because the number of specs being limited was removed (originally limited to 3, now unlimited). The costs for new specs were also reduced in a later update.



#19 Jegergryte

Jegergryte

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,525 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 12:03 PM

Odd sentiments from mister doctor bad canine there I feel. I mean, certainly, one is entitled opinions and I haven't tested all the games out there, that would be nigh impossible with my schedule. I do agree that this system might have benefited from a career/class-less solution (some threads have ventured into such solutions and possibilities), but the restrictions that are put in place are neither too expensive - not according to my experience GMing the game at least and my players don't complain - nor "counter intuitive" from a roleplaying point of view. Although these arguments are subjective and not really "right" or "wrong" … although having all careers have ranged light combat skill would be counter intuitive - it makes little sense that every citizen in a galaxy be trained in combat skills. A note on this: skill levels means substantial amount of training and frequent use, not basic skill and knowledge. All skills can be used "untrained" (there is no "untrained" concept in this game as far as I know - not counting the use of lightsabers) by RAW, as far as I know, and as some threads have noted on, the actual possession of a rank does not really change the chances for success all that much, not until a high number of ranks - or substandard characteristics.

What I do react on is the bold, blunt and senseless accusation and wonderful statement that … and I quote: "[i]t's a matter of them screwing up their game" … I'm not only perplexed or slightly offended, I'm completely taken aback by the silliness of such a statement. It implies some sort of "objectivity" and calls on some authority of the power of definition - rather than admitting that it does actually, contrary to the posters statements, come down to taste, style of play and other such subjective (and inter-subjective) notions of what is needed for a good gaming experience for said group. Whereas the latter is not really debatable, I mean taste and feelings are not really something to debate or seek any "truth" in when it comes deep down to it. The former statement, the one I quoted, is completely silly. Yes. This game could benefit from a multitude of different solutions, many of which no one has thought up yet. It could use some other system already in existence. This does not mean that they "screwed up their game", there is no complicated math for the generic person that completed school with (less than) average grades - addition and multiplications of 5 and 10 is not complicated by any stretch. I apologise if this latter statement sounds elitist, but as a social scientist engrossed in qualitative methods I have no knowledge about complicated maths and numbers at all, but 5s and 10s added or subtracted (or multiplied by 1, 2, 3 and so on) can only be considered complicated for the worst cases of dyscalculia, and I mean no offense by using the term and what it could implicate. I'm neither insinuating that anyone on these boards, the poster or anyone else, is suffering from this…

Furthermore I would only like to "second" Doc, The Weasel and Kallabeccas sentiments on house-rules and actually testing the game. My own experience has shown me that even the worst looking games can work perfectly if actually tested.


Make sure your brain is engaged, before putting your mouth into gear.

"What about the future...? We can only hope, we cannot however account for the minutiae of the quanta, as all accidents in an infinite space are inevitable."

GMLovlie's/Jegergryte's Cubicle direct link to supplements here.


#20 LethalDose

LethalDose

    Member

  • Members
  • 747 posts

Posted 20 November 2012 - 03:23 PM

doctorbadwolf said:

A lot of things about this game seem/are fun*, but my fears have been realized, and there just isn't any point in my group buying this game.

 

Specializations cost far too much. It's not about power gaming. It's about the set up of specializations not working for the types of characters we play. It's also about playing characters of various types that can actually fight, but that's a skill set up issue. Blaster pistols should be a skill for every single career.

The problem with the careers and specs in this game is that they are restricted in weird, counter intuitive, unexpected ways, and then have prohibitive costs associated with going around those restrictions.

Multi-specing in this game does not screw up the balance of the game. Mixing specs does not lead to characters that are more powerful than non mixed characters. There is literally no reason to hike up the cost. Further, having a fluctuating cost scale creates the same problem that multiclassed characters had in 3.5 DnD and it's derivitives when calculating skills. The math is complicated in ways that serve no good purpose. One has to take note of when one purchased each spec in order to simply double check their build math.

 

Basically, it's a system that feels in almost every way like it should have been truly "classless", but someone stubbornly refused to allow it.

 

No thank you.

This isn't a matter of not liking the style of game they're making, or it not being my sort of thing, etc. It's a matter of them screwing up their game. And now, for at least 5 years (if I remember the length of the license correctly) there won't be any new Star Wars RPG products worth purchasing for my group.

 

That's quite a bummer.

 

 

*Haven't played since around update 5 or 6, so there's some stuff I've not checked out first hand.

If you can't actually FACT CHECK the system before you ditch… LOL.  BYE!

I'm guessing we're better off without.






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS