Jump to content



Photo

Fixing Laser Grenadiers


  • Please log in to reply
32 replies to this topic

#1 Warboss Krag

Warboss Krag

    Member

  • Members
  • 379 posts

Posted 26 August 2012 - 11:55 PM

It seems to be agreed that the laser grenadiers need fixing. Yes, they are the **** in Dust Tactics; not so much in Warfare. And, they are dead ringers for the Red Skull's troops ("Hail Hydra!"), which makes them cool.

Here's my suggestion: Instead of giving the regular laser-werfer the 'laser' designation, simply double the amount of attack dice vs. troops. This makes them the dead shooty gits that they are in Tactics; you can rationalize it as lasers doing more damage more easily to mere flesh. The schwerer laser-werfer gets no changes; it's still real deadly against armor. The regular lasers retain their normal attack vs. armor, and also lose the 'laser' ability.



#2 ItsUncertainWho

ItsUncertainWho

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,888 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 03:33 AM

I'd be hesitant to change the Laser rule. When it works, it's fantastic. Instead, I think they need a range increase across the board for Laser weapons.

12" > 16"

16" > 20"

 24" > 28"

By adding 4" to all Laser weapons, they would become a good harassment unit. They would be a more viable threat for your opponent to consider when moving into an area they control and they would stay on that slightly lower damage range which might not overbalance them.



#3 ItsUncertainWho

ItsUncertainWho

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,888 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:01 AM

Another option, not sure how this would balance out…..

All lasers have a line of sight range. If you can see it, you can shoot it. This would make smoke and limited visibility a major player. If you went this way you would have to remove the exploding hits rule.

Then change the Laser rule. Laser adds: When a unit with a Laser weapon fires on a Target within 6” it reverses the attack die result (Hit on Blanks). 

This would make Laser units a constant threat that is deadly up close. It could over power them. It would need testing.



#4 Warboss Krag

Warboss Krag

    Member

  • Members
  • 379 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 05:37 AM

My 'fix' was based on the idea that lasers were, in Tactics, supposed to be able to put out a lot of fire (and damage armor where normal small arms couldn't). Thus doubling the attack dice vs. infantry. The 'laser' ability is too chancy, depending on the ability to get hits in the first place. As for their ranges, even in Tactics, lasers are shorter ranged than projectile guns…and FYI, lasers only have near infinite range in a vaccum; in atmosphere they attenuate like crazy, having to bull the air out of the way, losing energy with each millimeter.



#5 Major Mishap

Major Mishap

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,728 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 06:01 AM

 Lasers work well in DT so why not just allow re-rolls of re-rolls, no need for any other mods or rule changes. 



#6 ItsUncertainWho

ItsUncertainWho

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,888 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 06:17 AM

Warboss Krag said:

…and FYI, lasers only have near infinite range in a vaccum; in atmosphere they attenuate like crazy, having to bull the air out of the way, losing energy with each millimeter.

Yeah, that was the idea behind reversing the attack die within 6". 



#7 Warboss Krag

Warboss Krag

    Member

  • Members
  • 379 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 07:16 AM

Reversing the attack dice doesn't give you as many potential hits as it used to in Tactics.

BTW, we are all resolved that they do need fixing, right?



#8 Shadow4ce

Shadow4ce

    Member

  • Members
  • 645 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 07:22 AM

 I still like them. I'm in the minority of folks who play them, even handicapped as they are. But yeah, when compared to phasers, they need fixing. I like your idea WK.

But here's another thought…

Allies have rocket punches that hit on blanks. Why not lasers?  But only vs infantry, and either no rerolls, or rerolls only hit on bullseyes. 



#9 ItsUncertainWho

ItsUncertainWho

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,888 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 09:30 AM

I use them. They are good for annoying my opponent, until they get wiped out. 

The laser weapons need something. Compared to the Allied Phasers, the Lasers are quaint first generation technology that the allies passed by and settled on producing 3rd gen phasers instead.

Here is another random idea….

Give Lasers the Spray symbol for all infantry units, with the Laser effect intact.

This could be represented as the user tracking the beam back and forth around the area the enemy squad is in.

It would certainly make them mean, but is it too much?

Edit:

Yeah, it would make them the premier anti-infantry squad. Oh well…..



#10 Guest_Not In Sample_*

Guest_Not In Sample_*
  • Guests

Posted 27 August 2012 - 02:35 PM

The only problem I see with buffing lasers in warfare is that heavy laser grenadiers will end up being stupidly outrageously stupendously good. I mean they already melt down walkers in a single volley pretty much every single time I point them at a walker…. it would scare me if they were made better…. then they would be a one-shot killer of heavy walkers on an average roll for 35 points… shudder…

Personally, I would leave them alone…. laser grenadiers may be lackluster in warfare but they are still great in tactics and the models were made for tactics first before warfare even existed. You don't have to use them if you don't want to. If you love the look of them soo much that you have to absolutely have them in your list, then be like shadow4ce and bite the bullet and be imaginative to make them work for you…. Heavy laser grenadiers are fantastic in warfare and don't need any more advantages in any way… and I just don't like the idea of saying this laser gun has this rule but not that laser gun so if you beef up the laser grenadiers by improving the "laser" rule then you end up making the already awesome heavy laser grenadiers way too good… at that point, they might as well be called the super duper Winter Child laser studs and give them soldier 4 while you are at it… ok, I went overboard there, but they definitely don't need any help doing their job.



#11 blkdymnd

blkdymnd

    Member

  • Members
  • 958 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 02:45 PM

 I'm also in the minority that they are fine.  We've locally seen no issue with them and the points pretty much reflect what they can do.



#12 thejughead

thejughead

    Member

  • Members
  • 113 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 03:25 PM

I think they need a hero that gives them a buff of "spotter" , "agile", and 4 extra lives.



#13 DoomOnYou72

DoomOnYou72

    Member

  • Members
  • 269 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 03:48 PM

I use them and they work well enough. Better in Tactics but thats kind of niether here nor there when talking Warfare. But if the general consensus is that they need a boost I would keep it simple and not try to change any of the special rules (or anything of that nature that may effect other untis). Why not just change the stat line of the normal Laser–Gewehr to a 1/2  1/2  1/2  1/1 or 2/1  2/1  2/1  1/1 across the board for soldier targets? This would give them alittle more punch against infantry, no change vs. vehicles, and dosnt not alter the special rules of  any other units (the heavys are fine as is). Another option would be to give them assault making it easier to close with the enemy to compensate somewhat the range issue. Like I said Im OK with them as is but if the rules are changed to give them a boost I would rather that not effect any other units and it keeps with the streamlined nature of the rules.



#14 Pael

Pael

    Member

  • Members
  • 27 posts

Posted 27 August 2012 - 04:58 PM

What other infantry units have a weapon that can even wound a I3 or I4 model? They also are good at wounding T2 and T3 as well. I see them getting used more as infantry and vehicle units with a higher armor value start to show up in warfare. They would be very effective against SSU copters that are flying low to drop off their payload. Down comes the chopper out comes the laser and pop!! No more chopper.



#15 ItsUncertainWho

ItsUncertainWho

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,888 posts

Posted 28 August 2012 - 03:07 AM

Actually I like Doom's idea of giving the Laser Grenadiers Assault. It would certainly make me more willing to move them. 

And yes, the Heavy Lasers don't need any help. 



#16 thejughead

thejughead

    Member

  • Members
  • 113 posts

Posted 28 August 2012 - 06:57 AM

ItsUncertainWho said:

Actually I like Doom's idea of giving the Laser Grenadiers Assault. It would certainly make me more willing to move them. 

And yes, the Heavy Lasers don't need any help. 

Add Manfred to the squad and you are good to go.



#17 ItsUncertainWho

ItsUncertainWho

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,888 posts

Posted 28 August 2012 - 07:21 AM

thejughead said:

Add Manfred to the squad and you are good to go.

Unfortunately that would put them at one point more than the Heavy Lasers and takes a hero slot.



#18 Major Malfunction

Major Malfunction

    Member

  • Members
  • 120 posts

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:46 AM

ItsUncertainWho said:

thejughead said:

 

Add Manfred to the squad and you are good to go.

 

 

Unfortunately that would put them at one point more than the Heavy Lasers and takes a hero slot.

Sure, but with nine wounds and five lasers plus a Panzerfaust that needs no reload and Assault it's probably is worth the cost.



#19 Duckshirt

Duckshirt

    Member

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 29 August 2012 - 03:50 AM

What I don't get is how Sigrid's Laser PISTOL does more damage against infantry than the Laser Grenadiers and Heavy Laser Grenadiers walking around with giant power packs on their backs. Explicame that, por favor.

I'd take anything at this point. The entire utility of lasers is based on a lucky string of one-third hit chances. If you're going to create a luck-based unit, why not maintain the "re-roll forever" mechanic from Tactics? The chance of having a string of lucky hits would make me actually consider them, rather than the expectation of two hits with the first roll, and maybe a third hit on the exploding mechanic. (Which all subsequently get absorbed through cover/armor saves after moving a unit within 12" range to use their crappy weapons.)

If they don't want to maintain the Tactics re-roll mechanic or bring the dice rolls up with Sigrid's rolls, what about ignoring cover? Fluff-wise, a laser weapon is going to demand pinpoint accuracy to hit. And if it's on target, it's on freaking target. Phasers get to ignore armor saves, so why not let lasers ignore cover saves?

Uff, my envy of the Allied army is strong. Freaking rocket punches and UGLs and phasers and walkers with an extra machine gun.



#20 Major Malfunction

Major Malfunction

    Member

  • Members
  • 120 posts

Posted 29 August 2012 - 06:39 AM

Duckshirt said:

What I don't get is how Sigrid's Laser PISTOL does more damage against infantry than the Laser Grenadiers and Heavy Laser Grenadiers walking around with giant power packs on their backs. Explicame that, por favor.

Sigrid is a Hero… she gets prototype Uber weapons.

Duckshirt said:

Uff, my envy of the Allied army is strong. Freaking rocket punches and UGLs and phasers and walkers with an extra machine gun.

I feel ya. Personally, I don't mind the exploding dice mechanic of Tactics for Lasers. It's countered by the short range, and in Warfare would be further tamed by Suppression.

 






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS