Jump to content



Photo

The scoring system


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 bollywongaloid

bollywongaloid

    Member

  • Members
  • 93 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 11:04 PM

I apologise if I'm repeating old topics here but I feel like having a whinge so the hell with it….

I hate the +10 points per round scoring system!  I'm quite a conservative player.. I prefer to tread carefully through a quest, avoiding damage unless its necessary and anticipate what could possibly come up from the encounter deck and only commit the maximum amount of characters I feel it's safe to.  If I'm trying to get a good score however with this scoring system, I find myself taking risks more frequently e.g. engaging an enemy I can defend but not deal damage to, and more often than not they end up back-firing.  Besides, simply trying to sprint through the quest doesn't fit all the scenarios.

I think I could maybe live with +5 points per round but 10 seems a bit slap-dash and excessive.  After so many rounds, the Victory points system becomes a bit redundant.

Anyway, whinge over. Thanks for listening



#2 richsabre

richsabre

    Moby the Goldfish

  • Members
  • 4,610 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 11:55 PM

were you around for the old scoring system? it didnt have the round points, so the new scoring system was brought in to stop people hanging around at the end of the game to score more points

personlly i just dont bother scoring

rich


My Deviantart profile. Infrared Art http://richsabre.deviantart.com/

My Portfolio http://richardbyers.portfoliobox.me/

 


#3 Bohemond

Bohemond

    Member

  • Members
  • 566 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 01:04 AM

I will start for also voicing my displeasure with the scoring system.  That being said, +5 points a turn for solo play would allow you to set up loops where you are become incentivized to prolong the game simply to drop your threat to 0. If you have a scoring system, you need to construct it in such a way that encourages players to actually finish scenarios.



#4 bollywongaloid

bollywongaloid

    Member

  • Members
  • 93 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 01:51 AM

I wasn't around for the old scoring system and I can see what they were trying to do by introducing the new scoring system, but surely there's got to be another solution to prevent people from prolonging the game?  Maybe introduce a rule or something but I can't see something like that being implemented easily.

In any case, I can't see them changing it again in the near future so this thread is probably all in vain lol.



#5 leptokurt

leptokurt

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,147 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 03:23 AM

bollywongaloid said:

 

I wasn't around for the old scoring system and I can see what they were trying to do by introducing the new scoring system, but surely there's got to be another solution to prevent people from prolonging the game?  Maybe introduce a rule or something but I can't see something like that being implemented easily.

In any case, I can't see them changing it again in the near future so this thread is probably all in vain lol.

 

 

In Juicebox's tournaments we try to balance both approachs by including a win-loss ratio. You play three games, and the average result gets multiplied with the win-loss ratio.

Example: player A has 100, 120 and a 170 points - makes 100+120+170 = 390, divided by 3 = 130 points

player B has 80, 100 and a loss - makes 80 +100 = 180, divided by 2 = 90, multiplied with 1.5 = 135 points



#6 Mattr0polis

Mattr0polis

    Member

  • Members
  • 792 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 03:36 AM

The new system's not bad once you get used to it. The old system was definitely abusable as would +5 pts.

The best advice I can give is that wins should still be the most important thing, so I still wouldn't rush faster than your deck can handle or take too big of risks just for a chance at a better score. If your deck is good and you are playing smartly, good scores will come.

I'd much rather have 50 wins with a slightly higher average score than 15 wins with a great average.



#7 Troymk1

Troymk1

    Member

  • Members
  • 141 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 04:08 AM

richsabre said:

were you around for the old scoring system? it didnt have the round points, so the new scoring system was brought in to stop people hanging around at the end of the game to score more points

personlly i just dont bother scoring

rich

 

+1    I really don't 'get' scoring this game. Some of the best games you will play will be where you squeak through at the end, probably having lost a hero or two and damage counters like confetti across the table.  These will score badly….. :/

 

 



#8 Captain Poe

Captain Poe

    Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 09:56 AM

I can see the problems with the old scoring, where you hang around, lower your threat, get victory points, etc, so, it was imperfect. I hate the newer one ever more though… personally, I find it a burden to track rounds. Ive only ever scored one game, and posted it on these forums only to learn the scoring system had been updated to the +10/round version… haven't bothered since.



#9 Bullroarer Took

Bullroarer Took

    Member

  • Members
  • 591 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 10:14 AM

 The problem with any scoring system right now is that it is going to reward a certain style of play.  There simply aren't enough cards out there for different play styles to compete on an equal footing.  Maybe someday, but not for a while.  (And I really doubt it since the game is so Quest driven.  Now that is not to say that a fair tournament system can't exist: it can.  But you will be seeing a lot of the same play styles/heroes/cards.  Maybe that's the way it always is, I don't know.  This is my first card game.  (Just to be clear, I'm okay with it the way it is.  I play to have fun with the heroes I like and don't keep score.)


"I will not be suppressed!" - Nalir the Dwarf


#10 lleimmoen

lleimmoen

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 08:24 PM

The scoring still seems to be a major problem.

For those who don't keep the score, the older way still sort of applies, as it is easy to look over the board, see the threat dials and damage, and even if you're not going to count, you kinda know the less damage and less threat the better. In that way, I find the older system much more adequate, for counting the rounds just seems silly. I recognize (and had done before) however that stalling the game would be a problem in a tournament setting and thus introducing the round count makes sense but for personal purposes I much prefer the initial system (and no stalling).



#11 bollywongaloid

bollywongaloid

    Member

  • Members
  • 93 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 09:39 PM

yea, I feel as though the new system was put there to prevent me for something I never did, and would never consider doing.



#12 bollywongaloid

bollywongaloid

    Member

  • Members
  • 93 posts

Posted 28 June 2012 - 09:41 PM

prevent me from doing something sorry lol



#13 Glaurung

Glaurung

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,714 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 12:15 AM

the scoring system is pointless cose there is no tournament system. This make sense only on tournaments to prevent players play to long and make them play quickly as possible.But there is still no tournament system and looks like there will be no tournament for this game.

So who really cares about this scores if you play home and allowed to do what you want anyway??? 


Wizard is never late.......

#14 MyNeighbourTrololo

MyNeighbourTrololo

    Member

  • Members
  • 992 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 01:52 AM

I think things got messed up when they introduced new scoring system, while Victory points for villians and stuff were left untouched. They were clearly designed for first scoring sysem, now this 4 victory points doesn't compensates the time or resources(or both) you wasted to deal with it. 



#15 lleimmoen

lleimmoen

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,599 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 02:16 AM

Oh yeah, I agree whole-heartedly and will repeat: We need more VPs! Beside staying away from harm and keeping threat low, this is another clear indicator how the game went.



#16 Captain Poe

Captain Poe

    Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 03:52 AM

I think the problem could have been fixed if they just stated that you add any threat AFTER your initial starting threat against your score. The problem was, I  think, lowering your threat and then winning for an extra high score, which is not available really to anyone but spirit and a bit to lore outside of gandalf. I think, that if you want to risk victory to explore the encounter deck for extra victory points… well, shouldn't you be rewarded for that? Many of the enemies that give you victory points can easily screw you out of a win… i think if you want to take that risk, you should be rewarded with a higher score.

 

That said, i think the scoring system as it is now may work ok IF there were a competitive play… where the idea of short games are ideal because you don't want to wait for the one table that is pumping the victory display for 3 hours.

I see this being a bigger problem with the hobbit expansion, which seems counter intuitive here… as it sounds like you have to stretch out the game and search the encounter deck if you want to collect all the special items… I think that it sounds awesome, but shows a flaw in the grading system where you're penalized for completion.



#17 Mattr0polis

Mattr0polis

    Member

  • Members
  • 792 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 04:51 AM

Captain Poe said:

 

I see this being a bigger problem with the hobbit expansion, which seems counter intuitive here… as it sounds like you have to stretch out the game and search the encounter deck if you want to collect all the special items… I think that it sounds awesome, but shows a flaw in the grading system where you're penalized for completion.

 

 

I wouldn't say penalized. If the treasures work how it sounds like they will work (which is yet to be seen) then it just gives you interesting choices: do you spend a couple extra turns trying to find the treasure that will increase your chance of wins, possibly even quicker wins/better scores for the other remaining scenarios? Or do you skip the treasure and go for quicker scores, though the following scenarios might be a bit harder without a power treasure?

Btw, happy birthday, Captain Poe! (If that is indeed what that cake symbol means.)



#18 Captain Poe

Captain Poe

    Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 04:56 AM

Mattr0polis said:

Btw, happy birthday, Captain Poe! (If that is indeed what that cake symbol means.)

 

Thanks, i'm officially a hundred and eleven.



#19 Vyron

Vyron

    Member

  • Members
  • 204 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 05:18 AM

 I don't bother scoring… it is pointless and just keeps me calculating while I could be playing another round of the game… without a league or a tournament, it doesn't make any sense!

 

I could see this game as a sort of LEAGUE-style competition, where you regularly play games, establish a win/loss ratio, and then the best play a new custom-designed scenario (later available via POD)… a real one day tournament is just unimaginable for me and pointless… you're kind of playing WITH your friends… idk…



#20 Budgernaut

Budgernaut

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,376 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 09:09 PM

 You know what's funny? I played a few times in the tournaments, but then I stopped writing scores down. Nowadays I just play for the fun of beating a scenario. But despite that, (and I only just realized it because of this thread) I have been playing with two threat trackers (one for threat, one for rounds) for months.


"There is a fine line between neutral and amoral. In fact, there may be no line there at all."

--Count Dooku





© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS