All of the short ranged SSU walkers accept the Nina, are not air transportable. Yet the the artillery walker, the Ninita. the AA walker, the Nastasia. are air transportable?
Why would I want to bring my long range weapons closer to the enemy?
We have discussed the use of copper transports for walkers and no one can see the tactical advantage in them. Thier point cost outways any tactical advantage they could give.
Now they are supposed to play test this stuff rite? The rules don't even state what happens to a walker being transported by a chopper, if the chopper is shot down?
So I suppose my question is why would anyone bother to field a walker transport chopper?
The second topic topic of discussion is and all assault chopper army.
My friend pointed out to me that he felt that he an all assault chopper army would most likely win the next tournament. We use 250 point armies. This gives the SSU player 3-4 assault choppers depending on what he fields.
Now the Allies are weak when it comes to AA The Rattler is just a Wild Fire with a little more armor welded to it. It has the same fire power but costs 1/3 more? So my point is an Allied army is in serious trouble against a force like an all assault chopper army.
I run an Axis army with a Luther, a Heinrich, and a Stormkonig. Even with this of fire power I feel I could win against such an army 50% or less of the time. If I add more AA I make myself too weak in other categories.
This is not a question this is a serous game imbalance!