Jump to content



Photo

I'm out


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#1 Artaxerxes

Artaxerxes

    Member

  • Members
  • 205 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 06:16 AM

Seriously...

2nd edition Tilea will be published but I'll be buggered if I can even afford this game let alone have the patience to bother with it



#2 Anonymus

Anonymus

    Member

  • Members
  • 171 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:34 AM

I like how the game mechanics about combat, so you can spend the rest of the evening "roleplaying" how  you manage to hit the orcs in their faces and spleens...



#3 Darthvegeta800

Darthvegeta800

    Member

  • Members
  • 372 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:49 AM

What a 'splendid' community.
Barely anything is known so far and venom has been spat at FFG already.



#4 N0-1_H3r3

N0-1_H3r3

    Former Contributing Freelance Writer

  • Members
  • 3,330 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:04 AM

Darthvegeta800 said:

What a 'splendid' community.
Barely anything is known so far and venom has been spat at FFG already.

The same is the case with essentially every RPG community faced with a new edition of their game of choice - 'edition wars' will break out, overflowing with vitriol and declarations of loathing. It's annoying, but largely harmless so long as you're not too easily offended.


Writing Credits for Fantasy Flight Games: Into the Storm, Edge of the Abyss, Battlefleet Koronus, Hostile Acquisitions, Black Crusade Core Rulebook, First Founding, The Jericho Reach, The Soul Reaver, Only War, The Navis Primer,Ark of Lost Souls, and Hammer of the Emperor

I no longer write for, or am employed by, Fantasy Flight Games in any fashion. All of my comments are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of any employer, past, present, or future.

#5 Darthvegeta800

Darthvegeta800

    Member

  • Members
  • 372 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:24 AM

N0-1_H3r3 said:

Darthvegeta800 said:

 

What a 'splendid' community.
Barely anything is known so far and venom has been spat at FFG already.

 

 

The same is the case with essentially every RPG community faced with a new edition of their game of choice - 'edition wars' will break out, overflowing with vitriol and declarations of loathing. It's annoying, but largely harmless so long as you're not too easily offended.

 

True i suppose. The same goes for example for WH40K edition changes.
Still going so hostile with only a small preview as a foundation? I can understand a modicum of negativity or caution but this?



#6 Prof_Nexus

Prof_Nexus

    Member

  • Members
  • 10 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:26 AM

Jumping to conclusions is the only exercise some people get.



#7 Shadowspawn

Shadowspawn

    Member

  • Members
  • 156 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:30 AM

Darthvegeta800 said:

What a 'splendid' community.
Barely anything is known so far and venom has been spat at FFG already.

 

I said it before and I'll say it again. Disagreeing with the direction that FFG is taking with a game that we love is well within our rights. Expressing our annoyance can hardly be seen as besmirching the community. 

I suppose we are all expected to just accept and be happy about the changes, even if we don't feel that way? 



#8 N0-1_H3r3

N0-1_H3r3

    Former Contributing Freelance Writer

  • Members
  • 3,330 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:37 AM

Darthvegeta800 said:

True i suppose. The same goes for example for WH40K edition changes.

Still going so hostile with only a small preview as a foundation? I can understand a modicum of negativity or caution but this?

Compared to the D&D 3.5/4 edition war this is quite sedate, actually. And that one still causes border skirmishes to flare up now and again, two years after D&D4 was first announced and over a year since it was released. The last big one before that was the WFRP edition war of 04/05.

People are passionate about their hobbies, as can only be expected. When confronted with something that challenges their passions, they react, well, passionately.


Writing Credits for Fantasy Flight Games: Into the Storm, Edge of the Abyss, Battlefleet Koronus, Hostile Acquisitions, Black Crusade Core Rulebook, First Founding, The Jericho Reach, The Soul Reaver, Only War, The Navis Primer,Ark of Lost Souls, and Hammer of the Emperor

I no longer write for, or am employed by, Fantasy Flight Games in any fashion. All of my comments are my own, and do not reflect the opinions of any employer, past, present, or future.

#9 Diriel

Diriel

    Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:45 AM

Shadowspawn said:

Darthvegeta800 said:

 

What a 'splendid' community.
Barely anything is known so far and venom has been spat at FFG already.

 

 

 

I said it before and I'll say it again. Disagreeing with the direction that FFG is taking with a game that we love is well within our rights. Expressing our annoyance can hardly be seen as besmirching the community. 

I suppose we are all expected to just accept and be happy about the changes, even if we don't feel that way? 

Clamoring like its the coming of apocalypse when they've only put out a description blurb that goes on the back of a box?  I could point at other recent events where people make a lot of noise without knowing the full story, but i'd rather not start a flame war.

right now, none of us really know what the changes are and have nothing to really be upset or happy about.



#10 Claven

Claven

    Member

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:49 AM

I have to agree with Darthvegeta.

We don't know anything yet and people are starting outraged flame threads about how WFRP 3rd Ed sucks already. Gg.  



#11 ChaosChild

ChaosChild

    Member

  • Members
  • 526 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:49 AM

True, we have a very limited amount of information to go on right now (so it would be nice if FFG had actually given us some real detail to go on). However, the information we have been given is very disturbing.

The dice pool idea is hardly that revolutionary, sounds like a cross between games like Descent and a bunch of older RPGs I've got upstairs gathering dust (bought them, don't play them because the rules don't work). Might be wrong on this, but I'm extrapolating from what FFG have said and what I've seen elsewhere.

Cards as an integral part of gameplay; I just hate this idea, it's impractical for one thing. My group doesn't have anywhere to put a bunch of cards while we're gaming. We don't all sit around a table, because there isn't room. Instead we sit scattered around my living room, all we need with the current rules is a hard surface to rest on while we're writing and to roll the dice on (hardback rulebook does just fine for this).

Now we need somewhere to put cards, counters and other paraphenalia, you can't just use them from hand because which cards you select and put in play have a direct impact on gameplay (actions, stances?). Plus you've also got card and token management at a group level.

Careers: dozens to choose from? So fewer than you get in the core book for WFRP2 even if you only count the basic careers in other words. And the 40 or so careers in WFRP3 includes "advanced" careers like waywatchers, swordmasters, wizards, ironbreakers and witch hunters. Very different approach to the background right there.

So no, we don't have a huge amount of information. But I don't like what we do have.



#12 Gilead te tuin lothain

Gilead te tuin lothain

    Member

  • Members
  • 52 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:51 AM

Its the way that FFG have gone about introducing this game which raises my hackles.  All the crap of ART and the silence before and during, its just plain annoying tbh.



#13 Aldred Fellblade

Aldred Fellblade

    Member

  • Members
  • 39 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 10:00 AM

Saying that people have no reason to be concerned is disingenuous in my view. It's certainly true that fans tend to get excited about this sort of thing but to say that nothing is known is absurd. It's already clear that the new edition is going to have radically new mechanics and utilise a number of gimmicks that appear to be geared to discourage piracy. It's quite clearly a sea change in WFRP and surely people's understandable concerns don't deserve to be dismissed or patronised. Why should I want a game that mechanically bears virtually no relation to the game I like?



#14 Artaxerxes

Artaxerxes

    Member

  • Members
  • 205 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 10:02 AM

 

ChaosChild said:

 

So no, we don't have a huge amount of information. But I don't like what we do have.

 

 

Exactly, and I really do not have the money for £50 odd pounds to blow on this new edition, from what I've seen I'm sticking with what I know. Even if this means I'm seen as some sort of strange luddite (rpgite?)

This thread is here just as a response to the "I'm in" thread, I've stopped out of there and I've really not been vitrolic about the game at all, hell I was perhaps the calmest one on the forums when FFG first picked WFRP up... but now, bugger it. I've defended them to hell and it turns out the naysayers were right



#15 Valadar

Valadar

    Member

  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 10:21 AM

I've also been a bit disturbed by what I've seen but I think it would be better to reserve judgement once the final product is out. The pics from gencon show a character sheet that is extremely similar to the 2nd edition. So it is possible that they might be offering two ways to play the game, such as how there are two ways to rule armor in the 2nd edition rules.



#16 Lord of the Pit

Lord of the Pit

    Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 10:57 AM

Valadar said:

I've also been a bit disturbed by what I've seen but I think it would be better to reserve judgement once the final product is out. The pics from gencon show a character sheet that is extremely similar to the 2nd edition. So it is possible that they might be offering two ways to play the game, such as how there are two ways to rule armor in the 2nd edition rules.

This actually brings a glimmer of hope into my eyes again....



#17 Diriel

Diriel

    Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 11:22 AM

Valadar said:

I've also been a bit disturbed by what I've seen but I think it would be better to reserve judgement once the final product is out. The pics from gencon show a character sheet that is extremely similar to the 2nd edition. So it is possible that they might be offering two ways to play the game, such as how there are two ways to rule armor in the 2nd edition rules.

 

Player sheets in question...

3.bp.blogspot.com/_eqPrIE5E1OM/SoRCK5KBDmI/AAAAAAAAAGc/kCuHItjFC_A/s1600-h/0813091230-775642.jpg



#18 Valadar

Valadar

    Member

  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 11:42 AM

They seem to be a bit simplified but you can't really tell. Either way, its a step towards the good direction.



#19 Schwermuht

Schwermuht

    Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 11:50 AM

If the game has the slightest recemblance to a boardgame then I'm out for sure! I HATE it - I don't think it has anything to do with roleplaying! 

WFRP is dead - long live WFRP1 & WFRP2

 



#20 Claven

Claven

    Member

  • Members
  • 28 posts

Posted 13 August 2009 - 12:30 PM

Aldred Fellblade said:

Saying that people have no reason to be concerned is disingenuous in my view. It's certainly true that fans tend to get excited about this sort of thing but to say that nothing is known is absurd. It's already clear that the new edition is going to have radically new mechanics and utilise a number of gimmicks that appear to be geared to discourage piracy. It's quite clearly a sea change in WFRP and surely people's understandable concerns don't deserve to be dismissed or patronised. Why should I want a game that mechanically bears virtually no relation to the game I like?

 

To discourage piracy? 

Yeah, let's see... FFG has a huge problem with piracy, with all the succesful board games they sell, with DH (pure paper RPG, easily scanned) selling like hot bread and continually out of stock with most retailers - hilarious idea. 

Even if they did and they only wanted to milk money out of players - do you think it would be a good idea to release a risky and inventive new product in a 100 bucks box? That alone is going to discourage a lot of buyers, probably more than would download the pirated PDF if FFG just printed a new, lightly modified edition of the pure paper WFRP. 

Your piracy notions make no sense whatsoever. 






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS