Jump to content



Photo

With the republishing of Talisman, will Runebound dry up?


  • Please log in to reply
27 replies to this topic

#1 Redeucer

Redeucer

    Member

  • Members
  • 173 posts

Posted 25 November 2008 - 09:35 AM

I love Talisman.  I own three different versions and the expansion of it now.  I always thought of Runebound as a knock off of Talisman.  But now that FFG has the rights to both, will Runebound dry up and Talisman take over?



#2 ced1106

ced1106

    Member

  • Members
  • 93 posts

Posted 25 November 2008 - 11:45 AM

Not at all. If you look at the BoardGameGeek.com comments on Talisman, many of its players dislike the "roll and move" mechanic. Talisman has it, Runebound doesn't. There's room for plenty of adventure boardgames: Talisman, Runebound, Prophecy, both Warcraft games... the list is endless!



#3 darkmind

darkmind

    Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 26 November 2008 - 01:55 AM

Talisman have nothing to do with Runebound.

Talisman is REALLY easy game VS runebound



#4 jasonk

jasonk

    Member

  • Members
  • 18 posts

Posted 26 November 2008 - 05:57 AM

they're both the same game really. the only difference is talisman is awesome, and runebound is 'pretty good'.



#5 Mighty Martin

Mighty Martin

    Member

  • Members
  • 30 posts

Posted 26 November 2008 - 06:02 AM

I played both games, from the original talisman to the present day version and I own and have played all of the runebound expansions and I still can't get why people liken Talisman to Runebound, they are both completley different games that share only one common gaming mechanic, which is the starting abilities of characters can be upgraded.

A game that matches runebound style of play more closely is RETURN OF THE HEROES.  http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/8170. I could understand if you was to compare runebound to this game.

 

 



#6 talismanisland

talismanisland

    Harbourmaster

  • Members
  • 1,931 posts

Posted 27 November 2008 - 09:47 AM

I've never played Runebound, and I think I probably should to get a feel for what is different between it and Talisman.

Over the years I have seen the "arguments" for and against both of them. I'm all for the simplicity of Talisman, others seem to think Runebound is overly complicated... it's a PotAYto - PotAHto situation I feel.

There is an obvious link now between the two games, given that John Goodenough has contributed to them both (no bad thing imho).

My question would be (and I do not wish to feed the "Talisman is crap" - "No, Runebound is crap" - "No, Talisman is crap" lobby) -

Which parts of Talisman/Runebound can be taken from one game and injected into the other to make them both more than they currently are?

Discuss... NICELY!

 


Harbourmaster at Talisman Island - 15 magical years and counting!

Sometimes I even update the Talisman Island Facebook Page!

#7 jasonk

jasonk

    Member

  • Members
  • 18 posts

Posted 27 November 2008 - 02:53 PM

talisman does seem to have this, round and round and round, thing where runebound seems more open more oh i dunno spacious. and where things are right now, i mean right now, with the 4th ed. you are very limited to movement. can't wait for the horse and cart.



#8 Cohen

Cohen

    Member

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 28 November 2008 - 05:29 AM

Well i played the 1st ed Talisman and 2nd ed and i really think that Runebound is the better game buy miles its more open than the limited paths of Talisman and i think it wont dry up but really Talisman is a different game to play so i think its unfair to compare the two i mean look at the old runequest game that GW done like 20+ odd years ago if any one remembers that one are you going to compare that to Descent



#9 tazbro

tazbro

    Member

  • Members
  • 56 posts

Posted 28 November 2008 - 08:21 AM

I hope Runebound continues. 

Its a very different game from Talisman.  I have a complete set of 2nd edition Talisman and it hasn't been played in about 5 years.  Meanwhile I've played Runebound many times this year.



#10 playdead

playdead

    Member

  • Members
  • 50 posts

Posted 28 November 2008 - 05:25 PM

WELL, they're both fantasy-themed boardgames, but they're quite different past that! There's no reason both can't do quite well! I really enjoy them both and look forward to good futures for both titles...



#11 Gallagen

Gallagen

    Member

  • Members
  • 130 posts

Posted 29 November 2008 - 09:26 PM

Both are great games, both deserve to not 'dry up', both are fun.

I personally feel apart from the Fantasy theme, they are very different games.

My small and useless say on the matter.



#12 andrew33

andrew33

    Member

  • Members
  • 6 posts

Posted 30 November 2008 - 06:06 AM

Having never played Talisman, I can't commet on the pros/cons of one versus the other. All I can say is that I hope Runebound doesn't dry up, considering how much $$ I have invested in all the expansions, class decks, etc. Plus the upcoming Frozen Wastes expansion seems to imply that Runebound will continue (at least for a little while).



#13 Ruvion

Ruvion

    Member

  • Members
  • 758 posts

Posted 30 November 2008 - 06:55 PM

...and FFG describes Runebound as "The perfect fantasy adventuring board game"...doesn't that imply that it has secured its place in a never drying well of game production?



#14 Torbal

Torbal

    Member

  • Members
  • 214 posts

Posted 01 December 2008 - 10:25 AM

If RB "dries up," it won't be because of Talisman. It will be because FFG opts to try to make more money with another product than this one. i for one hope that RB is here for the long haul, because the game is great and has so much room for future expansions.



#15 Slev

Slev

    Member

  • Members
  • 256 posts

Posted 02 December 2008 - 09:51 AM

Martin (Runebounds original designer) lives around here. He taught us to play RB when it was first released. He said he designed it as a replacement for Talisman.

Given that brief, you can see whay people liken the two.



#16 Ruvion

Ruvion

    Member

  • Members
  • 758 posts

Posted 02 December 2008 - 02:20 PM

Mr. Wallace games with your group?



#17 H3C70R

H3C70R

    Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 03 December 2008 - 10:51 AM

I love Talisman (i have 2nd - with all expansions, 3rd and 4th edition), but now I play Runebound.

In my humble opinion, I don't think that Runebound will dry up due to Talisman, or vice versa.



#18 godfeather

godfeather

    Member

  • Members
  • 66 posts

Posted 03 December 2008 - 11:17 PM

andrew33 said:

 

Having never played Talisman, I can't commet on the pros/cons of one versus the other. All I can say is that I hope Runebound doesn't dry up, considering how much $$ I have invested in all the expansions, class decks, etc. Plus the upcoming Frozen Wastes expansion seems to imply that Runebound will continue (at least for a little while).

 

 

Well, isn't that a reason not to release more Runebound expansions.



#19 David Spangler

David Spangler

    Member

  • Members
  • 270 posts

Posted 04 December 2008 - 11:37 AM

I haven't played 4th edition Talisman, but I used to play Talisman a lot with all the expansions and enjoyed it, though it could go on interminably.  Of the two, I find Runequest more flexible and open-ended.  Also, the immersive sense of being in a fantasy world comes alive more for me in the play of Runebound than in the play of Talisman.  I've never been a big fan of "track" games like Monopoly or of the roll and move mechanic.  Still, in its day, Talisman was one of my favorite games and saw lots of playing time.   

I can see the similarities in concept, but the play is very different.  I fully intend to purchase every new Runebound expansion that comes out, but I can't say that about Talisman.  I doubt I will even get the new 4th edition.  However, as others have said, both games have their core audiences, each fills a niche, and that's as it should be.  Let them both thrive, live long and prosper!



#20 Ruvion

Ruvion

    Member

  • Members
  • 758 posts

Posted 05 December 2008 - 07:51 PM

godfeather said:

Well, isn't that a reason not to release more Runebound expansions.

Sacrilege!

Someone sic the weasel on the blasphemer, who seeks to deprive us of our precious....Runecrack!






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS