Jump to content



Photo

Second Edition Beta- playing a sniper STILL not possible.


  • Please log in to reply
95 replies to this topic

#81 Cogniczar

Cogniczar

    Member

  • Members
  • 513 posts

Posted 07 February 2014 - 03:40 PM

Fair enough on the Marksman talent. I haven't encountered that talent with enough frequency to recall it easily, but yes, it does negate the penalties for long range. 

 

Crackshot though isn't in my copy of DH 2.0 or in the update I can see (if you see it, please let me know where it is). I do get the giest of it from the earlier lines. I'm wondering if this was an oversight and we'll see it in the finalized version or intentionally left out.

 

The target being unaware is completely situational though, so i'd rather not take that into account. Yes, it's true in many cases but not all. 

 

Realistically, in order to be a sniper in DH 2.0 you'll need to invest in quiet a few talents and characteristic bumps to be adequate to great. Definitely not a concept that can be run from creation. 



#82 Kshatriya

Kshatriya

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,687 posts

Posted 07 February 2014 - 04:21 PM

 

 

 

I find that players typically don't realize that any home-brew or super-sniper combo they come up with can validly be turned back on them.

 

I think the players should have a mechanic in place to eliminate mooks and minions with a singular sniper shot from time to time. 

 

As has been said, they do. I'm playing in a game with a sniper-assassin. No fancy alt-ranks, no fancy gear beyond his long las + red-dot sight. He drops mooks frequently in 1 hits. Hardier enemies in 2. He doesn't even use hotshot.

 

 

If he's using a red-dot sight, he's giving his position away prior to firing,

 

Nothing in the rules suggests this. He may actually not even use a red-dot, tbh.

 

Target is rarely unaware (or we forget to use the rule) but half-Aim + Accurate bonuses + range + Marksman (head shots called) are usually good enough.



#83 Cogniczar

Cogniczar

    Member

  • Members
  • 513 posts

Posted 07 February 2014 - 05:00 PM

Yes, in regards to the red dot sight - when I made that previous post for some reason I had the imagery of a red dot laser in my head. I realized I erred on that account, forgetting about the optical red dot sights existence (irl). 

 

XD

 

either way, fundamentally, we don't agree on 'usually good enough'. It falls short of my expectations on a dedicated, professional sniper while fullfilling the archetypical 'scout sniper'. 



#84 Kshatriya

Kshatriya

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,687 posts

Posted 07 February 2014 - 06:40 PM

To be fair the actual scenario of the professional military sniper (long solo prep time in an isolated, hidden hidey-hole) does not mesh well with the nature of this game, or many RPGs (same issue playing in Shadowrun - the build is generally viable, but most combat occurs within about 20 meters, so it's a lot more effective to throw a lot of lead downrange, especially since you will be under ideal sniper conditions maybe 1 mission out of 50).


  • bogi_khaosa likes this

#85 Alrik Vas

Alrik Vas

    Member

  • Members
  • 200 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 09:15 AM

Fair enough on the Marksman talent. I haven't encountered that talent with enough frequency to recall it easily, but yes, it does negate the penalties for long range. 

 

Crackshot though isn't in my copy of DH 2.0 or in the update I can see (if you see it, please let me know where it is). I do get the giest of it from the earlier lines. I'm wondering if this was an oversight and we'll see it in the finalized version or intentionally left out.

 

The target being unaware is completely situational though, so i'd rather not take that into account. Yes, it's true in many cases but not all. 

 

Realistically, in order to be a sniper in DH 2.0 you'll need to invest in quiet a few talents and characteristic bumps to be adequate to great. Definitely not a concept that can be run from creation. 

I agree that you can't do it out the gate.  Yet in real life you don't either.  It takes a lot of training and experience to do what those guys do.  You'd be a sharpshooter/scout for a while.  It's an RPG, there's always going to be room to grow.  I think your expectation might be unrealistic.


  • segara82 likes this

#86 Cymbel

Cymbel

    Member

  • Members
  • 735 posts

Posted 08 February 2014 - 09:59 PM

Don't forget a sniper would be using a telescopic scope (negate some range penalties with full aim action), full aim for the scope and accurate...

+30 right there, +40 with BC onward for single shot.

 

Assume a BS of 40 (30 normal human, 35 a good shot, 40 for the cream of the crop) for the would be marksman and we are getting around 70/80% of ***** "hitting" in a combat environment. Seems close enough to IRL standards,



#87 BinarySecond

BinarySecond

    Member

  • Members
  • 19 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 11:16 AM

 

The more I see people ***** about the strength of the sniper rifle, the more I question how powerful the damn thing will need to be before any of you are satisfied. I've seen sniper rifles level creatures designed to be used against space marines in DW. Seriously, if you need more power invest in 'Weapon training: Heavy' and get a man portable lascannon.

The vincare uses a special type of rifle called an Exitus Rifle. Its far, far more powerful than the regular sniper rifle.

 

If the Exitus Rifle uses a turbo penetrator round, Its at 4D10+2 Pen 14. Thats before including mighty shot and the one that lets you add damage on criticals, or any bonus damage from accurate. How is this underpowered?

It's undeprowered when you realize 4d10+2 can result in anything between 6 and 42. If you can show me a Xeno overlord who can die from 6 points of damage, then sure, it's really powerful...

 

4d10+2 sounds really scary, but in reality, it's terribly uncertain. It would have been much more reasonable if it was 3d10+7. But in reality, it should be something like 1d10+17. Because yeah, 19 damage is something that I can get behind as a reasonable minimum. And 22 is definitely a reasonable medium target number.

 

but 6 as a minimum? Not even close.

 

But again, killing anything with one shot should never be possible, without extraordinary luck. No, scratch that, killing anything more substentional then normal unarmoured human with a single shot shouldn't ever be possible at all, luck or not.

 

But I wish the game was honest about it, that's all.

 

Well when you quote the min/max of dice rolls yes it's going to look obscene, BUT if you take an average case (1d10 rolled infinitum gives 5.5) You're looking at 24 damage - which is good!



#88 Cogniczar

Cogniczar

    Member

  • Members
  • 513 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 11:56 AM

 

Fair enough on the Marksman talent. I haven't encountered that talent with enough frequency to recall it easily, but yes, it does negate the penalties for long range. 

 

Crackshot though isn't in my copy of DH 2.0 or in the update I can see (if you see it, please let me know where it is). I do get the giest of it from the earlier lines. I'm wondering if this was an oversight and we'll see it in the finalized version or intentionally left out.

 

The target being unaware is completely situational though, so i'd rather not take that into account. Yes, it's true in many cases but not all. 

 

Realistically, in order to be a sniper in DH 2.0 you'll need to invest in quiet a few talents and characteristic bumps to be adequate to great. Definitely not a concept that can be run from creation. 

I agree that you can't do it out the gate.  Yet in real life you don't either.  It takes a lot of training and experience to do what those guys do.  You'd be a sharpshooter/scout for a while.  It's an RPG, there's always going to be room to grow.  I think your expectation might be unrealistic.

 

It's not unrealistic. One of the big issues that plagued the DH 2.0 Beta process was half of the community wanted to play competent, high end Inquisition and the other half wanted to build up from a relatively inexperienced, low end inquisition. It's a matter of taste, not realism, as to what the starting point should be. 

 

Argueably, the characters in this game already represent the training we associate with professionals. The sniper schools in real life are measured in months, and the characters we create in the game are seasoned by years. It's one of those things that just doesn't translate well. 

 

On a side note: Please don't use the 'It's an RPG' as a valid arguement. Our discussions here are more along matters of subjective taste, and that sort of declaration carries a certain level of objective truth, which neither one of us possess. Thanks. =D

 

To be fair the actual scenario of the professional military sniper (long solo prep time in an isolated, hidden hidey-hole) does not mesh well with the nature of this game, or many RPGs (same issue playing in Shadowrun - the build is generally viable, but most combat occurs within about 20 meters, so it's a lot more effective to throw a lot of lead downrange, especially since you will be under ideal sniper conditions maybe 1 mission out of 50).

 

This is more or less the point I was trying to make earlier. The game (DH 2.0) currently supports a scout-recon sniper who operates within a combat fire fight, rather than the long-range sniper who sits in raven nests waiting for their target.  



#89 Alrik Vas

Alrik Vas

    Member

  • Members
  • 200 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 03:40 PM

Sniper schoool is measured in months, so is basic training, so is advanced infantry, survival school is measured in weeks, qualifications for various weapons can be done over days.

 

However, training isn't "you've done it, now you're done", it's an on-going process.  Experience is what makes them what they are.  You're right, RPG's don't do this very well when the fluff claims you're the "best there is to offer organization X" when you start off with, at best circumstances, an 80% success rate on a shot (meaning you're around a 40-50% under "normal" environs of combat).  Absolutely, that doesn't sound like a professional, it sounds like someone who understands what they're supposed to do, but hasn't done it enough.

 

So, in real militaries, they have operators train constantly while they aren't on deployment.  Doing this doesn't just keep them sharp, it often makes them better for the next time they're deployed.  There's no equation for this in an RPG, so they go with experience points instead.

 

Yet I actually think this gets away from the point of the discussion.  The post title reads that a sniper isn't possible in DH2.0 Beta, when just as in Only War, it absolutely is.  If the post was about, "RPG's aren't true to life, so let's not talk about mechanics", then i'd be more inclined to follow your argument.

 

Lastly, whether a sniper or a sharpshooter is useful in DH2.0 has merit is entirely up to the players and the GM of a game.  If the Arbites find the enemy, the psyker uses his voodoo to scout it out and the scum draw the enemy into position, the assassin can certainly put one between the sorcerer's eyes from 600+ meters away, using the Guardsman as a spotter.  If instead the GM decides to make a large combat inside a building to be the final confrontation, the sniper would be acting as a sharpshooter instead, something they'd also be good at.



#90 Cogniczar

Cogniczar

    Member

  • Members
  • 513 posts

Posted 11 February 2014 - 04:25 PM

Welp, the horse is beyond dead and now a mass of meat. 

 

No one should ever pitch house rules to provide alternatives, since this ruleset is completely tight and coherent. =D


  • Green Knight and Lynata like this

#91 pearldrum1

pearldrum1

    Member

  • Members
  • 846 posts

Posted 23 February 2014 - 07:55 PM

Which I'm sorry about. New here. Real sorry.

 

 

You SHOULD be.

 

... We have killed for less.


  • doomande, Lynata and Cail like this

#92 bogi_khaosa

bogi_khaosa

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,155 posts

Posted 24 February 2014 - 01:55 PM

Well

 

1) 1.3 rounds per kill is not a guaranteed kill. It 's more like a 66% kill. Not counting that "kill" here is not actually "killed," but "removed from combat." Which BTW Dark Heresy will give you.

 

2) 50,000 rounds per kill for M16 includes training fire, suppressive fire, firing into the air, very little of it is actually shooting to kill a person.


Edited by bogi_khaosa, 24 February 2014 - 01:56 PM.


#93 wolph42

wolph42

    Member

  • Members
  • 191 posts

Posted 06 March 2014 - 10:50 AM

 Also, rolling 4 ones is just as likely as rolling 4 fives, actually. The "avarage roll" is always a simplification, since the only thing you can really be certain of, is that 4d10 will produce something between 4 and 40. That doesn't mean it will produce 20 more often then 10 really.

 

I noticed nobody reacted to this piece of ignorance. 

TRUE: the chance to roll 4 5's are the same as rolling 4 1's 

NOT TRUE: the chance to roll 4 is the same as rolling 20 

 

its simble math, the outcome is evenly distributed for ONE die, but not multiple. 

4 is only possible to achieve with 4 1's. 

20 however can be achieved with (a few examples)

- 5,5,5,5

- 5,4,6,5

- 4,4,6,6,

etc.

The above list actually counts 633 permutations which means that the chances to roll a total result of 20 is 633 !!! times higher than rolling 4. Chance to roll 22 even 670 times higher (which is what has the most chance of rolling). 

Actually the chance that you roll below 17 is only 17% or in other words there is an 83% chance that you roll 17 or higher on the damage roll. 

 

Just thought to point this out. 

 

o and I didn't take righteous fury into account, which makes the *average* damage even higher. 


Edited by wolph42, 06 March 2014 - 10:59 AM.

  • Darth Smeg likes this

#94 Cail

Cail

    Member

  • Members
  • 400 posts

Posted 14 March 2014 - 03:07 AM

Welp, the horse is beyond dead and now a mass of meat. 

 

No one should ever pitch house rules to provide alternatives, since this ruleset is completely tight and coherent. =D

The point of the thread is not that someone can't houserule something to change the game. Go ahead, have fun. However the dsicussion is about whether or not the current ruleset (or the new proposed one) allows effective sniper characters to exist in its current incarnation.


Edited by Cail, 14 March 2014 - 03:35 AM.

  • Kshatriya likes this
  • Intellect is the Understanding of Knowledge.
  • Sentience is the Basest Form of Intellect.
  • Understanding is the True Path to Comprehension.
  • Comprehension is the Key to all Things

 


#95 Alrik Vas

Alrik Vas

    Member

  • Members
  • 200 posts

Posted 15 March 2014 - 08:34 AM

Which it does, as I've explained.  I never offered up any houserules as an explanation of how you could make a sniper in Dark Heresy.

 

Matter of fact, let's go through it point by point.

 

Talents:

SP, Bolt and Las training, Marksman, Dead Eye Shot (and it's upgrade, which i forget the name of), Mighty Shot, Crack Shot, Sprint...and i forget the name of the talent that Ignores Cover, but I know it exists.  These are all available in the current set up.

 

New Talents (OW and newer): Stealth Sniper (makes it bloody impossible to find where you're shooting from), Versitile Shooter

 

Skills: Stealth (or Concealment/Silent Moves for old DH), Survival, Awareness, Operate: Aeronautica (Snipers should be versed in drop ops), Scholastic Lore: Tactica Imperialis, Tech Use (creative use of vox channels is a plus), Security, Athletics skills are a plus as well.  The majority of these skills should be upgraded to at least +10.

 

Characteristics: BS 50+ (60 perferred), AGL 50+, PER 50+

 

What you have is a character who can get into position anywhere they need to and can make the shot from any range or angle they need to.  They can even get accuracy bonuses out of some non-sniping weapons and good luck spotting them before, during or after their shot.  They'll have ample time to get away when their target is down as well, partially due to their talents, partially due to careful planning, which is what a sniper should be all about.

 

Of course this isn't a starting character, but it's easy to play this type even before you've got all the necessary tricks.  You do the job enough, it gets easier as you go.  That's experience.


  • Kshatriya likes this

#96 Cail

Cail

    Member

  • Members
  • 400 posts

Posted 16 March 2014 - 02:53 AM

Which it does, as I've explained.  I never offered up any houserules as an explanation of how you could make a sniper in Dark Heresy.

 


I was clearly replying to Cogniczar. I'm in total agreement with you.


  • Alrik Vas likes this
  • Intellect is the Understanding of Knowledge.
  • Sentience is the Basest Form of Intellect.
  • Understanding is the True Path to Comprehension.
  • Comprehension is the Key to all Things

 





© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS