Am I attacking others for preferring a different interpretation of the setting? Please show me where exactly you see this "intolerance". Are you certain this is not a case of the pot calling the kettle black, given your past responses to my criticism on DH's injury system?
That I am promoting different - or, from the position of this RPG, alternate - takes on the background has nothing to do with tolerance but with the lack of consistency within the franchise as a whole. People deserve to know how this IP operates, lest they are goaded into false beliefs about it and end up being confused about contradictions (as they exist even between different books of this RPG alone), and not knowing that they are perfectly within their rights to pursue a different vision of the 41st millennium without having to think of it is any less valuable than the official material - or, in fact, that their vision may already be part of official matterial elsewhere.
One of Warhammer's greatest failures is that it rarely communicates how all the material is actually supposed to tie into each other - as such, I see my remarks about statements from people who worked in or with GW about this topic as potentially helpful advice for people who made the same mistake as I once did.
Or, in other words, I believe that someone has to say it. The silly thing is that I have to explain myself like that.
For what it's worth, however, I can see how my constant nagging about what I'd like to see different, or where a current implementation has disappointed my hopes and expectations, may get on someone's nerves - at least when that someone cannot understand these preferences. It's the same feeling I get sometimes, so at least there we have something in common.
Edited by Lynata, 29 December 2013 - 04:06 PM.