Jump to content



Photo

Question about Dodge


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#21 bogi_khaosa

bogi_khaosa

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,064 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 06:41 AM


 

Well now, that is very good to know.

 

Does parry work in a similar fashion? For instance if my assault marine attempt two attacks on an enemy, can that enemy only parry 1 attack or does it have a chance to parry all attacks against it?

 

 

 

This is one of many things that DW uses to make melee combat unrealistically viable.



#22 pearldrum1

pearldrum1

    Member

  • Members
  • 608 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 06:48 AM

Just read, to shock my memories correct, Dual-Wielding rules in DW and in my mind by RAW you can only Parry one attack per Round.

 

And as Multiple Attacks are separate rolls you could only Parry one attack out of possible maximum off 4 attacks (Swift attack grants 2 attacks to your main hand and Lightning Attack 3 attacks to main hand. You can only make 1 off-hand attack)

 

Seems stupid as you can Dodge multiple attacks from automatic fire weapons but not multiple hits from melee attack.

 

As user of OW rules I have ported them to DW also so that removed much of the headache these rules had when we started playing DW.

 

Remember when we started playing DW and our Assault marine used Parry and GM said "Ok, you just Parried first attack but 2 following attacks from Hormagaunt hits you."

 

We all (Players and GM) were like this after checking rules then:

images.jpeg

This is the win of the century.

 

What are the OW rules regarding parry? I want to incorporate those.



#23 Routa-maa

Routa-maa

    Member

  • Members
  • 476 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:14 AM

Well basically Parry and Dodge are are similar to each other when used against multiple attacks.

 

So each DoS, when you Dodge/Parry, reduces one additional hit when used against Swift, Lightning, Semi-auto, Full Auto and Twin-linked. When used against weapon with Storm quality it negates 2 additional fit per DoS.

 

Just remember that Degrees of Success are counted little bit differendly in DW and OW. In DW you get basic success and then start to count how many additional DoS you get over it, as in OW you start to count from 1 DoS and then add other DoS you gain.

 

PS. I know this might be pointless but remember, "You can only Dodge ranged attacks, but can use either Dodge or Parry when in Melee combat."

 

PPS. Also someone was thinking how Overwatch works in OW. If it's your turn and you walk to area, being under Overwatch, you cant Dodge that attack as you can only use Dodge/Parry when it isn't your own turn.


  • pearldrum1 likes this
Muutokselle annamme Elämän, Elämälle annamme Muutoksen.

#24 pearldrum1

pearldrum1

    Member

  • Members
  • 608 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:18 AM

 

 1 DoS and then add other DoS you gain.

As per homebrew rules, I already do this in my game.

 

 

PS. I know this might be pointless but remember, "You can only Dodge ranged attacks, but can use either Dodge or Parry when in Melee combat."

 

Totally pointless, but I had no idea and for some reason I am glad I know now.



#25 Routa-maa

Routa-maa

    Member

  • Members
  • 476 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:39 AM

Well I know some players that insist that they can use Parry to swat aside bullets and stuff.

 

Too much Star Wars and D&D.


  • pearldrum1 likes this
Muutokselle annamme Elämän, Elämälle annamme Muutoksen.

#26 herichimo

herichimo

    Member

  • Members
  • 867 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 08:40 AM

You need to be careful importing a single aspect of OW ruleset.
 

For instance, parrying multiple melee attacks might seem wonderful, but DW gives characters a lot of options to mitigate the number of attacks not found in OW. Characters in OW do not need the perternatural speed ability to make multiple attacks, therefore moving a character out of engagement range with, say assassin strike, doesn't work with OW rules. In DW, that character just forced the other character to either move and sacrifice all of its additional attacks (even TWF is a full action) or abandon melee combat altogether.
 

By introducing the 1 parry for all attacks by itself, you are stacking the deck too far into the defender's favor.

 

 

Even in OW a character can only take actions on his turn. Therefore when a character uses the overwatch attack he is interrupting the active character (even in the middle of a run action) and temporarily becomes the active character until the overwatch attack is resolved. The defending character is no longer the active character until the attack is resolved. If the defending character is aware of the overwatching character he may dodge if possible.



#27 Routa-maa

Routa-maa

    Member

  • Members
  • 476 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 09:50 AM

Well I have moved all Actions from OW to DW and it didn't brake. Also Traits are modded to use OW (Unnatural giving +4 gives more manageable bonus than x2 or x3)

 

So for example when making Lightning Attack your WS bonus is maximum number of attacks you make (per melee weapon) so Dual-wielding you make double that in possible hits.

So WS 50 guy can get max 5 hits per melee weapon, so total for dual wielder would be 10. Dodging all those is quite a feat, so you would have to roll 10 DoS in Dodge/parry for not gettin hit.

 

Also for Overwatch, you don't interrup other characters turn but you both take action at the same turn.

 

From Overwatch action description

"If this attack occurs at the same time as another character’s Action, the character with the higher Agility acts first. If both characters have the same Agility, they make an Opposed Agility Test to see who acts first."

 

 

It's good to have your players stats handy as you can make some dice rolls for them and then say "Sorry you didn't notice anything" or in case someone has paranoid talent "You feel your neck hairs raising as you notice something is foul"

 

And I use software to make dice rolls so I can show my players how I rolled for them after declaring they are suprised so no one can say I have cheated. Not that they are demanding it as they know I don't fudge or cheat on rolls.


Muutokselle annamme Elämän, Elämälle annamme Muutoksen.

#28 bogi_khaosa

bogi_khaosa

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,064 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 11:05 AM


 

Even in OW a character can only take actions on his turn. Therefore when a character uses the overwatch attack he is interrupting the active character (even in the middle of a run action) and temporarily becomes the active character until the overwatch attack is resolved. The defending character is no longer the active character until the attack is resolved. If the defending character is aware of the overwatching character he may dodge if possible.

 

In the OW errata (I think?) it specifically states that you cannot Evade an Overwatch attack.

 

I know... different game line.



#29 bogi_khaosa

bogi_khaosa

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,064 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 11:07 AM


So WS 50 guy can get max 5 hits per melee weapon, so total for dual wielder would be 10. Dodging all those is quite a feat, so you would have to roll 10 DoS in Dodge/parry for not gettin hit.

 

The chance of Dodging 2x5 attacks with a Dodge of 50 and Step Aside is higher than the chance of making 2x5 attacks, actually. I think. So it is less of a feat than getting  those 10 hits.

 

EDIT: Math time!

 

WS50 - 10 (Lightning Attack) - 10 (Two-Weapon Wielder) = 30%... actually he can't get 5 x 2 = 10 hits, he can only get 3 x 2 = 6 hits. Around half the time, he will get zero hits.

 

vs. Dodge of 50%.

 

The chance of getting 3x2 = 6 hits is 1%.

 

Thc change of Dodging (or Parrying) 3x2 = 6 hits is 30 x .3 = 9%.

 

Yeah.


Edited by bogi_khaosa, 22 December 2013 - 11:35 AM.

  • pearldrum1 likes this

#30 Kshatriya

Kshatriya

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,686 posts

Posted 22 December 2013 - 02:27 PM

 


 

Even in OW a character can only take actions on his turn. Therefore when a character uses the overwatch attack he is interrupting the active character (even in the middle of a run action) and temporarily becomes the active character until the overwatch attack is resolved. The defending character is no longer the active character until the attack is resolved. If the defending character is aware of the overwatching character he may dodge if possible.

 

In the OW errata (I think?) it specifically states that you cannot Evade an Overwatch attack.

 

I know... different game line.

 

Different line, more evolved (better) rules.



#31 herichimo

herichimo

    Member

  • Members
  • 867 posts

Posted 25 December 2013 - 06:36 PM

In the OW errata (I think?) it specifically states that you cannot Evade an Overwatch attack.

 

I know... different game line.

 

 

No.

 

If it did I would have seen it when I checked the errata when doing my research for the above post.

 

As for other comments. Please refrain from moving the goalposts.

When another character activates his overwatch the active character's turn is interrupted so the overwatching character can make an attack. The target character cannot move away from the killzone before the attack takes place for instance (which would be possible if he were active at the same time as the shooter) since he cannot do anything until the attacker has resolved the attack. Overwatch is similar to delay (not identical, but similar) in which the normal initiative order is modified allowing a character to take his turn (using actions which can only be used on said character's turn) outside of normal initiative order.

 

A standard attack, semi-auto burst, and full-auto bursts are all attack actions which cost a Half, full, and full action to use. A character cannot use these actions outside of his own turn. Overwatch allows a character to use one of these actions outside his own initiative order, allowing him to have a limited Turn to carry out those attacks outside of its normal initiative order.

 

It would be interesting to see if anyone would be so pro-"no reaction" if their GM ever used it intelligently against the players. Say a platoon of veteran heavy infantry troops with 12 twin-linked scoped lascannons with the following conditions: Gun 1 fires at first target (Astartes) who comes around the corner, gun two fires at second (or first if it isn't killed), gun three the third, etc.. and being a good GM he doesn't tell you what just shot (and likely) killed you, as your fellow kill-team members wouldn't actually know, they'd just see you get hit and fall over with a gaping hole in your chest.

Yeah, TPK sure is fun.


  • Kshatriya likes this

#32 LordBlades

LordBlades

    Member

  • Members
  • 211 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 09:52 AM


 

It would be interesting to see if anyone would be so pro-"no reaction" if their GM ever used it intelligently against the players. Say a platoon of veteran heavy infantry troops with 12 twin-linked scoped lascannons with the following conditions: Gun 1 fires at first target (Astartes) who comes around the corner, gun two fires at second (or first if it isn't killed), gun three the third, etc.. and being a good GM he doesn't tell you what just shot (and likely) killed you, as your fellow kill-team members wouldn't actually know, they'd just see you get hit and fall over with a gaping hole in your chest.

Yeah, TPK sure is fun.

 

 

 

1. The GM can TPK you anyway and anytime he feels like it. This rule is bad because the GM could use it to TPK you isn't a very useful argument because it applies to almost every rule in the game.

 

2. Your  example is actually pretty bad at doing what is supposed to be doing. Even if you were allowed to dodge the first attack (and if you weren't wearing termie armor, if you rolled high enough as marines suck at dodging etc.) you only have 1 Reaction. Let's say yo dodge the first Lascannon shot.Now you're back to square one vs the remaining 11.

 

3. If the first guy goes around the corner without peeking first (which since AFAIK you can't delay/Overwatch/whatever Called Shots means they'd be shooting him in a situation where everything other than his head has a ton of cover) and the kill-team do go around the corner without taking any precautions after the first guy dies, then they deserve to get aTPK.



#33 Adeptus-B

Adeptus-B

    Part-Time Super Villian

  • Members
  • 1,828 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 04:58 PM

I'm very new to the system and our group has just had its second fight.  After rolling an insanely good attack (seriously, like a 1 when I needed less than 104), an ork was able to dodge the bullet and take 0 damage.  Seems like Dodge (and probably parry) are all or nothing.  So is there a way (traits, etc) to make it more difficult for someone to dodge/parry your attack?

 

The DH2Beta is testing making Dodge and Parry opposed tests rather than flat pass/fail checks.


  • pearldrum1 likes this

#34 Kshatriya

Kshatriya

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,686 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 06:17 PM

 

I'm very new to the system and our group has just had its second fight.  After rolling an insanely good attack (seriously, like a 1 when I needed less than 104), an ork was able to dodge the bullet and take 0 damage.  Seems like Dodge (and probably parry) are all or nothing.  So is there a way (traits, etc) to make it more difficult for someone to dodge/parry your attack?

 

The DH2Beta is testing making Dodge and Parry opposed tests rather than flat pass/fail checks.

 

The result of that is going to be a lot more hits.



#35 bogi_khaosa

bogi_khaosa

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,064 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 10:36 PM

 


The result of that is going to be a lot more hits.

 

 

Especially with semi and full auto, which will become nigh-undodgeable (assuming that the SA/FA system is not changed).

 

Accurate will become even scarier, because the same die roll that gives you more damage will make the attack harder to avoid. Ditto Razor Sharp and other weapon qualities.


Edited by bogi_khaosa, 27 December 2013 - 10:36 PM.


#36 Kshatriya

Kshatriya

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,686 posts

Posted 28 December 2013 - 11:11 AM

One balance is auto fire going to negative mods instead of positive. But it really can be trivial to get +30 to hit mods. There's no competing way to do the same with Dodge/Parry mods. Hence why I think opposed tests for hit/avoidance are a truly terrible idea: offense scales much more quickly than defense.


  • bogi_khaosa likes this

#37 musungu

musungu

    Member

  • Members
  • 118 posts

Posted 21 January 2014 - 07:07 AM

I had a huge uproar amongst my players when we first tried out the combat system - of course because a truly beautiful melee attack with a truckload of DoS was parried with a barely successful test. We even tried using Parry as an opposed skill, but an encounter with genestealers (and their 60+ Ag) demonstrated why it's such a bad idea. It nearly broke the game. Since then, we agreed that however perfectly you aim your chainsword, if someone puts something in the way, even clumsily, it still throws your attack off target.

 

I'm still a bit unclear on the topic of multiple attacks though. A standard attack is just a half-action, so even a mediocre enemy could theoretically attack twice in its round, while you can parry only once. How do you handle this? Ruling that the 2nd attack connects every time seems a bit harsh for me. The characters are still on the first level, mind you, so no fancy talents are factored in at the moment; think very basic, very vanilla tactical SMs.

 

EDIT: I just checked the core rulebook following a heads-up in a different thread, and I found the answer. So apparently one cannot use two half actions of the same subtype in the same round. Huh. Yay for research!


Edited by musungu, 21 January 2014 - 08:35 AM.


#38 Kshatriya

Kshatriya

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,686 posts

Posted 21 January 2014 - 05:50 PM

I had a huge uproar amongst my players when we first tried out the combat system - of course because a truly beautiful melee attack with a truckload of DoS was parried with a barely successful test. 

This is why Only War's Swift/Lightning Attack are great because they work like auto fire, so a barely-successful parry will only negate one of possibly several full hits. Of course, in DW RAW, most enemies only have 1 Reaction and Swift/Lighting is going to be 2-3+ attack rolls (more if TWF is used).



#39 pearldrum1

pearldrum1

    Member

  • Members
  • 608 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 03:45 AM

I was thinking about something like this;

 

If attacked by multiple hits - furious assault or swift attack - players roll their parry as normal. If they succeed by more DoS than the attack against them, they will be given the opportunity to parry a second attack. I was thinking that having a second melee weapon (TWW talent) would grant an additional DoS to the defender.

 

What do you think? Is it still stacked too heavily in the defender's favor?



#40 herichimo

herichimo

    Member

  • Members
  • 867 posts

Posted 22 January 2014 - 04:32 AM

We cannot forget what a parry is though. You aren't resisting force with force, i.e. putting something in the way. To stop a sword a la hollywood sword blocking, you have to be around 3 or 4 times stronger than the other person. (Was going to say 2 times, but the muscles used to hold the sword in "blocking" position are less used than those used for swinging so...)

 

A Parry is using your skill to strike the attacking weapon in such a way it is deflected away from your person. You aren't stopping the attack, just nudging it a few inches to the side.

 

EIther way, both methods of parrying have their positives and detractors. I personnaly prefer the DW version as a melee centric character has the opportunity to earn additional parries. While the OW version may seem better at first glance, as musungu brought up, super melee characters can become practically unkillable in melee with their 60+ WS + a (possible?) 10-20+ parry rating. Combine that with high damage, high armor pen, and rediculously fast movement and you have a recipe for tedium as the party either gets TPKed by enemies doing 5-6 hits average and can't be hit due to a rediculous parry, or sits there for 2 hours rolling dice at a couple of enemies till one finally takes enough damage to kill it by bombing parry rolls.






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS