Jump to content



Photo

ROTATION!


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#1 divinityofnumber

divinityofnumber

    Member

  • Members
  • 606 posts

Posted 30 November 2013 - 05:42 AM

FFG - consider two tournament formats for this game. 

 

1) The core set, deluxe expansions, and the last two cycles worth of chapter packs. 

2) All cards (given the banned and restricted lists)

 

It would make it easier for new players to enter the game!


Edited by divinityofnumber, 30 November 2013 - 11:45 AM.

  • snaggrriss likes this

Star Wars LCG: FFG EC Regional 2014 - Top 4; Star Wars LCG: FFG Event Center Store Championship 2014 - Top 4; FFG Event Center Season One 2014 - Minneapolis Regional Game Night - Top 4; May the 4th Be With You 2013 - Second Chance Tournament Champion; A Game of Thrones LCG: Days of Ice and Fire 2013 - Joust Top 16

abUse the Force author on CardGameDB.com


#2 Daenarys

Daenarys

    Member

  • Members
  • 353 posts

Posted 30 November 2013 - 09:34 AM

Could not disagree more. The learning curve is steep but if you persevere you reap the rewards.

 

As things are works perfectly



#3 divinityofnumber

divinityofnumber

    Member

  • Members
  • 606 posts

Posted 30 November 2013 - 11:43 AM

Could not disagree more. The learning curve is steep but if you persevere you reap the rewards.

 

As things are works perfectly

 

I know. I have been playing since the beginning of the LCG and own all of the cards. But, I keep hearing people say that the buy-in is the big hurdle, the thing preventing them from jumping in and playing. 

 

It would be cool if tournaments had two formats. 

 

I would NEVER be for using the rotation method as the default way that AGoT is played. I love using the entire card pool. 

 

But, having a side-tournament in which only a limited pool was used would be cool. 

 

Yes, that is similar to what draft is covering, but not exactly. 

 

Also, excuse the CAPS in the title; that was the result of one too many glasses of wine and reading that Warhammer Invasion just died. I don't want AGoT to die. 


  • MarthWMaster likes this

Star Wars LCG: FFG EC Regional 2014 - Top 4; Star Wars LCG: FFG Event Center Store Championship 2014 - Top 4; FFG Event Center Season One 2014 - Minneapolis Regional Game Night - Top 4; May the 4th Be With You 2013 - Second Chance Tournament Champion; A Game of Thrones LCG: Days of Ice and Fire 2013 - Joust Top 16

abUse the Force author on CardGameDB.com


#4 MarthWMaster

MarthWMaster

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,207 posts

Posted 01 December 2013 - 10:44 AM

Could not disagree more. The learning curve is steep but if you persevere you reap the rewards.

The problem is that "if." With the HBO series still going strong, this is a ripe time for expanding the AGoT playerbase. But not everyone is willing to drop hundreds of their hard-earned dollars and see what good comes of it. The whole draw of the LCG format is its accessibility, and having to track down dozens and dozens of gaming products in order to compete removes that. Players will just shrug and go back to playing Magic.

There needs to be a way to ease new players into this game. Notice that divinityofnumber is not proposing we drop the unlimited format. This would just be an alternative format in which newer players could have the full experience of the game, before making the hige investment required to play with those who have been here since the beginning.


Edited by MarthWMaster, 01 December 2013 - 11:24 AM.


#5 mdc273

mdc273

    Member

  • Members
  • 973 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 12:59 PM

Drafting makes everything easier. If you want new players that won't be deterred by the large card pool, make drafting a thing once the packs come out.


  • snaggrriss likes this

#6 AndrewH

AndrewH

    Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 02 December 2013 - 08:41 PM

As a new player myself, I've got to say, tournament rules mean nothing to me. It's how my local casual group plays that matters to me. The thing that turns me off the most is the hidden complexity of the rules - I should be able to know how cards interact without ever hearing the words "Framework Action Window" :(

If your local group plays a bunch of championship net-decked builds using cards from the last 5 years, and won't let you proxy or lend you cards, then it could be un-fun. But the answer to that is more "stop being jerks" than "change the tournament rules", I think.


  • RobotMartini likes this

#7 Khudzlin

Khudzlin

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,409 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:23 AM

If your local group plays a bunch of championship net-decked builds using cards from the last 5 years, and won't let you proxy or lend you cards, then it could be un-fun. But the answer to that is more "stop being jerks" than "change the tournament rules", I think.

 

+1 Especially about not lending.



#8 dcdennis

dcdennis

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,376 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 09:09 AM

To be honest I think all unofficial tournies should allow proxies. So long as they are full color and good quality there is no real reason not to allow it. Some may say "the difference in quality of proxies is subjective", and that's true, but I think as a community we all know if a proxy would be tourney acceptable or not.
  • sbarnabas, Bomb and RobotMartini like this

#9 sbarnabas

sbarnabas

    Member

  • Members
  • 34 posts

Posted 03 December 2013 - 10:25 PM

To be honest I think all unofficial tournies should allow proxies. So long as they are full color and good quality there is no real reason not to allow it. Some may say "the difference in quality of proxies is subjective", and that's true, but I think as a community we all know if a proxy would be tourney acceptable or not.

Totally agree.  Then I could build a deck, print it out and play, instead of trying to dig through the nightmare that is my card stack.  Seriously, this would be amazing.



#10 Bomb

Bomb

    Cool Person Club

  • Members
  • 1,762 posts

Posted 04 December 2013 - 01:05 PM

I agree about proxies as long as they are copies of the actual card and are legible.  I've had to borrow cards before and you can easily end up forgetting to return them or somehow losing them on the person.  To be honest, I don't know about having a full deck being all proxies.  I think running only a few would be more reasonable.

 

EDIT:  I'm speaking of non-FFG sanctioned tournaments.  Any official tournament I would not agree with proxies.


Edited by Bomb, 04 December 2013 - 01:13 PM.


#11 divinityofnumber

divinityofnumber

    Member

  • Members
  • 606 posts

Posted 04 December 2013 - 02:23 PM

I think that there is precedent via MTG for allowing use of proxies. Didn't MTG lower-level events allow proxies of some older and very expensive cards for a while?


Star Wars LCG: FFG EC Regional 2014 - Top 4; Star Wars LCG: FFG Event Center Store Championship 2014 - Top 4; FFG Event Center Season One 2014 - Minneapolis Regional Game Night - Top 4; May the 4th Be With You 2013 - Second Chance Tournament Champion; A Game of Thrones LCG: Days of Ice and Fire 2013 - Joust Top 16

abUse the Force author on CardGameDB.com


#12 mdc273

mdc273

    Member

  • Members
  • 973 posts

Posted 04 December 2013 - 04:03 PM

I think that there is precedent via MTG for allowing use of proxies. Didn't MTG lower-level events allow proxies of some older and very expensive cards for a while?

 

Well the MtG rules for proxies pretty much explicitly state you have to have a copy of the card, so they can't really be applied here:

 

"Proxies

 

Proxies are substitute cards created solely by judges in sanctioned tournaments pursuant to the official tournament rules. These substitutes are allowed when authorized game cards become unplayable during a sanctioned tournament because of damage or excessive wear. Proxies do not include any graphical reproduction of their intended substitutes." - Wizards.com

 

That being said, there is no inherent reason that an unofficial tournament couldn't allow proxies other than choosing not to.



#13 divinityofnumber

divinityofnumber

    Member

  • Members
  • 606 posts

Posted 04 December 2013 - 09:23 PM

I thought that in Legacy MTG allowed a proxy or two for some of the old cards that cost thousands of dollars. I could, of course, be wrong, but think that I remember that. 


Star Wars LCG: FFG EC Regional 2014 - Top 4; Star Wars LCG: FFG Event Center Store Championship 2014 - Top 4; FFG Event Center Season One 2014 - Minneapolis Regional Game Night - Top 4; May the 4th Be With You 2013 - Second Chance Tournament Champion; A Game of Thrones LCG: Days of Ice and Fire 2013 - Joust Top 16

abUse the Force author on CardGameDB.com


#14 dcdennis

dcdennis

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,376 posts

Posted 05 December 2013 - 06:10 AM

interestingly enough, i fall on the complete opposite side of the fence regarding proxies when it comes to CCGs. Probably because for CCGs, obtaining the cards is actually part of the game, in LCGs it is not because everything is available to everyone by default.



#15 Khudzlin

Khudzlin

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,409 posts

Posted 05 December 2013 - 06:11 AM

You might be thinking of Vintage tournaments (in Legacy, the insanely priced cards are banned, because they're also insanely powerful). I think WotC doesn't organize any Vintage tournaments, but they do organize Legacy tournaments.



#16 mdc273

mdc273

    Member

  • Members
  • 973 posts

Posted 05 December 2013 - 12:05 PM

I thought that in Legacy MTG allowed a proxy or two for some of the old cards that cost thousands of dollars. I could, of course, be wrong, but think that I remember that. 

 

I actually thought the same thing, but Googled it just to be sure. I was equally surprised that the official rules said that. I was expecting proxies for Black Lotus and Moxes to be considered acceptable, but I think Khudzlin is right about the Vintage thing.



#17 bloodycelt

bloodycelt

    Member

  • Members
  • 804 posts

Posted 05 December 2013 - 12:28 PM

In non-sanctioned MtG Vintage Tournaments, they usually allow 9 - 12 proxies, they also usually have high-stakes prizes like actual power-9 cards. 

 

I should point out FFG has League Play which is Core + current LCG cycle. 

 

Also: in MtG if you want to build a deck that can even do OK in Friday Night Magic, you are expecting to spend upwards of $200-300. 

 

For local play Core + Expansion + 1-2 specific chapter packs can get you a decent starting point. You still will not win much at first, since you are a new player. 



#18 Khudzlin

Khudzlin

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,409 posts

Posted 06 December 2013 - 01:05 AM

I actually thought the same thing, but Googled it just to be sure. I was equally surprised that the official rules said that. I was expecting proxies for Black Lotus and Moxes to be considered acceptable, but I think Khudzlin is right about the Vintage thing.

 

Well, Black Lotus and the Moxes are legal only in Vintage (and even in that format, they're limited to 1 copy in the deck).



#19 imrahil327

imrahil327

    Member

  • Members
  • 428 posts

Posted 06 December 2013 - 08:12 PM

Bloodycelt said:

"I should point out FFG has League Play which is Core + current LCG cycle. "

 

Wait what? Is that the format that leagues are 'supposed' to run on?


Edited by imrahil327, 06 December 2013 - 08:13 PM.


#20 -Istaril

-Istaril

    Member

  • Members
  • 777 posts

Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:26 AM

Bloodycelt said:

"I should point out FFG has League Play which is Core + current LCG cycle. "

 

Wait what? Is that the format that leagues are 'supposed' to run on?

 

News to me as well...






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS