So we've had two ~4 hour sessions now, with our newly formed group.
We're slowly getting the hang of both the rules and playing online and we've noticed that fighting is incredibly slow.
We've determined that this is because of Suppressive Fire and Pinning and are now trying to figure out how to fix this, whether we don't get something or whether this needs at least a houserule or even Errata.
What we've had happen is that the players basically get pinned immediately and then lose all semblance of effectiveness and mobility. Could we aim and shoot, or get to better positions, we would take our enemies out rather faster, as we saw towards the end of the first fight, when there were fewer enemies left.
Currently, we are outnumbered and couldn't suppress all enemies from the start, giving them the chance to suppress us, from which we haven't been able to escape since, partly due to the fact that it always lasts at least one round, stopping us from moving out of their firing arc.
Our current idea on how to fix this would be to apply the bonus (+30) that one gets from being in cover to the pinning test, giving us a 40-50% chance to resist pinning in the first place, instead of 10-20%.
Additionally, we want to limit pinning from semi-auto, so that it can only pin as many targets as shots fired, while full-auto keeps everyone pinned.
To us, this seems like it would speed the game up A LOT, which is a good thing.
What are your thoughts?
Suppressing Fire, Suppressing Gameplay
Posted 28 September 2013 - 01:53 PM
So we've had two ~4 hour sessions now, with our newly formed group.
Posted 28 September 2013 - 03:58 PM
There's a reason that all the sample NPC Guardsmen have Nerves of Steel.
- Euza likes this
Posted 28 September 2013 - 04:09 PM
Suppressing Fire can pin a maximum number of characters equal to the rounds of ammunition shot. The shooter nominates the primary target he wishes to suppress, the additional targets suppressed are the ones closest to the primary target (considering line of sight, friendly-fire does apply).
The limitations of a maximum 45° cone of suppression applies to normal range, long range limits the cone to 30° while extreme range limits it to 15°.
this is copied from our houserules, it limits suppressing fire
also we automatically included the +30 bonus from being in cover to the initial pinning test (making a semi suppression +20 and a full supression +10)
hope that give some inspiration
- pearldrum1 likes this
Posted 29 September 2013 - 01:36 AM
Do I know you?
Because that's exactly our rules XD
bogu_khaosa, sure, but even if Nerves of Steel fully doubles my chances, I still end up with an 80 or 60 percent chance of being pinned down.
And that's even if you can get the talent easily.
If I get the rules right, then Pinning is a different effect from Fear and then there are almost no effects, barring some rare equipment that you can't requisition normally, to improve your rolls. That leaves you with improving WP being the only thing possible, since Resistance (Fear) and Radiant Presence wouldn't work and Iron Discipline and Into the Jaws of Hell only work on comrades. Which is useful, since their Pinning only ends when the sarge issues an order, so preventing them from being pinned at all is good, but leaves the players still vulnerable.
Which leads to the slightly weird situation that the Psyker is most resistant to Pinning. I see why and see no better solution, so I'm fine with it, although it is weird :-)
Posted 29 September 2013 - 06:36 AM
Well if you can get to cover you should recover from it pretty quickly, assuming the enemy isn't doing suppressing fire every round.
I have thought that the chance to do it with semi-auto should be much less, or taken out entirely, as in previous WH40KRP lines. Two shots with a laspistol isn't really a "hail of fire."
Posted 29 September 2013 - 06:46 AM
Well, given that they outnumber us, at least one guy is always available for suppressing fire.
So, sure, I get out of pinning at the end of my turn or after two turns, but they can just keep on pinning me, and I have no way of countering that.
Yeah, that could be another option: Leave it really powerful, but only for full auto weaponry. That would make Heavy Gunners more important and give guys with auto-guns a big advantage... For three turns, when they have to reload, and most of them won't carry that many clips. That could work too, thanks for the tip!
Posted 29 September 2013 - 09:02 AM
That's how it works in Dark Heresy, Rogue Trader, and Deathwatch -- suppressing fire only works with full auto.
Posted 29 September 2013 - 09:24 AM
i thinks its viable for a semi-auto weapon to suppress but a very limited number of people
supressive fire is not only hail of bullets in a general direction but can also be a series of quick semi-accurate shots (which would in reality frighten me much more) thats why we have the rule that limits the number of suppressed targets by RoF
i think its not so bad really, you can still shot back with half-actions even if you are being pinned while in cover
sure its not as accurate but if your squad is outnumberen but still better skill-wise you will turn tables relativly quick and can then suppress them
its actually pretty realistic this way, but i agree it streches combats a bit (especially against a good tactician on the player side, last combat was really intense in my group, the sarge and i, as GM, litterally played a tactical game )
Posted 29 September 2013 - 12:14 PM
Without aiming? They have cover too, and if we can't make called shots to the not-covered areas we're not gonna hurt them. We don't outdo them by that much, skillwise...
Posted 29 September 2013 - 05:26 PM
You can shoot back with half action s, but isn't your BS at -20?
Posted 29 September 2013 - 05:28 PM
if the range is close enough use grenades, if not frag missiles or frag grenades from a grenadelauncher or even mortars really help
my players use grenades extensivly (they have 4 frags as standard issue) and they actually requisitioned auxiliary grenadelaunchers for a few soldiers because they work so well (random scatter ftw )
Posted 30 September 2013 - 05:03 AM
Yeah, that -20 is also there, true. And applies to grenades, too!
We've used grenades too, but gotten relatively unlucky with the damage rolls...
Still, unless the grenades kill them or stun them, it doesn't diminish their effectiveness at suppressing us. And we can't throw grenades for that long.
Posted 01 October 2013 - 07:13 AM
try a smoke grenade and create some obfuscation between you and them, cant really shoot accuratly at you if the cant see you, also its not really dependend on rolls, even if you screw up the to-hit roll there is still smoke somewhere
Posted 02 October 2013 - 01:26 AM
That's the thing though, they don't have to shoot accurately (except to kill us, but even a quick death would be better) to suppress us. Sure, even less chance to actually take damage, but playing grenadiers, this is already pretty low against guardsmen, what with the carapace armour...
Posted 02 October 2013 - 06:24 AM
what happens after the suppression? do the enemies charge for melee or what?
just suppressing an enemy in cover is not doing much besides wasting ammo so even if the squad is suppress they can stick to cover and wait out the soon to be reload or out of ammo from most weapons (especially SP ones)
Posted 02 October 2013 - 07:35 AM
Posted 02 October 2013 - 08:03 AM
if its a training there is a superior officer watching i guess
i bet he is not to fond of how that firefight went, maybe solve it with roleplay and storytell the fight
like i said its no use to them if they suppress you and cant damage you and dont charge you for melee or grenades so its a useless fight and the officer might want to set an objective (e.g. capture the flag in given time)
else its bound to be a stalemate anyways
Posted 02 October 2013 - 08:59 AM
They do come close and use grenades, but my char has survived two grenades without a scratch. They're not too powerful versus 6AP and 4 TB...
Also, since they're Guardsmen, they don't try to melee us, not least because we'd certainly have the upper hand there.
Yes, it's a shame there's no time limit. That would probably help. But against an enemy that just wants to kill us, to, idk, prevent us from reporting their position? There's no time limit either, and It's no fun this way. Also, were we the ones with the time limit, we'd be screwed because we can't act.
Posted 02 October 2013 - 09:10 AM
well if delaying your enemy is enough to complete an objective thats fine i guess
do the enemy guardsman use overcharge? even if its lasertag mode they should have the option, the M36 is based on the idea that you can use the settings to adapt to different enemies and +2 dmg +2 pen should be enough to get to you even wearing carapace and 4 TB (6-14 dmg vs an effective soak of 8)
also since you are suppressed why dont the enemy guardsman use called shots to target bodyparts not behind cover since they have the time to aim for 1 full round and than use called shot yielding a +0 to hit role with the usual BS 35 (and maybe even a +10 for short range) thats a 28% (36%) chance to inflict at least 1 wound considering their numerical superiority they should waste you pretty easy
Also dont they use any heavy weapons or special weapons to take you down while you are pinned or dont you have them to retaliate?
Edited by Nightcloak, 02 October 2013 - 09:19 AM.
Posted 02 October 2013 - 01:41 PM
Yeah, they don't seem to be using overcharge, I don't know why, and yeah, they have no time limit.
Both of those are a shame and would force a more active game.
Still, even if they did use overcharge, it would take them several rounds to kill even one of us and we'd still be unable to really do much.
Yes, strategy and situation should make it more interesting than a deathmatch, but as it stands, if we're attacking or the enemy is just trying to kill us all, the game is screwed. We can't go on the offensive effectively as long as one enemy manages to use suppressive fire, nor can we run or even stand and fight, because suppressive fire just stops us and the game dead.