Jump to content



Photo

Triumph vs Threat


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1 Jomero

Jomero

    Member

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 02:16 PM

I haven't found anything definitive in the book, so I can only assume answers based on omission.

 

The question I've been trying to answer is:  If a person's roll nets them 1 triumph and 1 threat after all cancellations... what happens?  I know Triumphs count as one success.  And they can be used for things that normally cost Advantage.  But it doesn't appear that Triumph cancels out threat.

 

I've been playing that Triumph doesn't touch threat, but Triumphs always resolve regardless.  And any remaining threat then also resolves.

 

So in my example of 1 triumph and 1 threat, I would rule that as "While you crit with your weapon, you exerted yourself to make the shot and suffer 1 strain."  Or the equivalent.

 

Does that sound right to you guys?


"Everyone roll Save vs Death Star."


#2 MILLANDSON

MILLANDSON

    Playtester

  • Members
  • 3,356 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 02:18 PM

In your example, did the dice show enough Failures to cancel out the success from the Triumph?

~Yea, Tho I Walk Through The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death, I Shall Fear No Evil~

 

Posts/views/opinions are in no way representative of FFG, and are entirely my own.


#3 Jomero

Jomero

    Member

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 02:22 PM

In your example, did the dice show enough Failures to cancel out the success from the Triumph?

 

No.  The roll is a success.  But there are remaining threat.

 

Edit:  And when I said "Triumphs always resolve" I meant in the form of their advantage, and not their success (since a failure can absolutely cancel triumph's success).


Edited by Jomero, 05 August 2013 - 02:26 PM.

"Everyone roll Save vs Death Star."


#4 Dex Vulen

Dex Vulen

    Member

  • Members
  • 452 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 02:26 PM

Assuming 1 Success, 1 Triumph and 1 Threat your answer would be correct.  Having said that... spice it up!

 

Blasting the Stormtrooper squarely in the chest and rendering him lifeless (crits kill minions) getting in position for the shot took a little effort. (1 Strain)


Proud Member of the Gand Anti-Defamation League.


#5 Endrik Tenebris

Endrik Tenebris

    Member

  • Members
  • 680 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 03:58 PM

Yeah, rolls can get exciting.  You could potentially have a successful roll that nets Triumph AND Despair AND Threat.  They might do something awesome, but they also might run out of ammo and leave themselves open to attack.


FFG Star Wars RPG Content - Periodic Updates.  Species, items, and more:  https://www.dropbox....3x57/qXerqp6BHq

FFG Star Wars Mass Effect Conversion - In Progress:   https://www.dropbox....woxz/xr0nnETGK4

 

 


#6 Krieger22

Krieger22

    Member

  • Members
  • 684 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 04:04 PM

You don't specify what sort of roll it is, but as an example:

 

Your character was picking the lock on a door. He succeeded, which opened the door (success) and in a stroke of good luck also managed to completely disable the alarm (Triumph). However, as he slips inside he can hear footsteps approaching from around a corner (Threat).


  • Dex Vulen likes this

#7 DavetheLost

DavetheLost

    Member

  • Members
  • 348 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 06:27 PM

Yes. A net result of 1 Triumph, 1 Success and 1 Threat means all three resolve. It is quite possible to end with a net result of 1 Triumph and 1 Threat, if there are enough Failures rolled. In that case the test is failed, something really good happens, and something kind of bad happens.

If shooting at a Stormtrooper with 1 Triumph/Success and 1 Threat, maybe your shot nails the trooper and blasts through his armour sending him to the ground in a lifeless heap, but the sound of the shot alerts his companions nearby.

With a net Failure, but still a Triumph and a Threat, your shot goes astray missing the trooper, but hitting a control box and bringing down the blast doors, however you can hear a fresh squad of troopers now trying to break through. On a Deapair instead of a Treat maybe you brought down the blast door behind the squad instead of in front of them..
  • Dex Vulen likes this

#8 Nashable

Nashable

    Member

  • Members
  • 190 posts

Posted 05 August 2013 - 07:45 PM

Best advice I can give for funky results. Resolve the positive results first (or if you are a kind GM, resolve the players side of the deal first, e.g. advantage/triumph on PC rolls, threat/despair on NPC rolls) as that establishes a boundary to work on the rest of the dice results.

 

The actions should result in more complex events but shouldn't undo each other. So if a PC rolls 3 advantage and wants to make an NPC fall over, they shouldn't then on the despair have the NPC bounce right back up.


  • AWAD likes this

Member of the Brick Vader fan-club (NSFW)
Author of the award winning Ship Repair for GMs (Detailed | Simple)


#9 Jomero

Jomero

    Member

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 06 August 2013 - 09:49 AM

Sorry if I was unclear about what the dice were showing.  What I meant was that after all cancellations, only 1 triumph and 1 threat were reamaining.   So, for example, a roll similar to:  3 successes, 3 failures, 1 triumph, 1 advantage, 2 threat.  

 

That would net 1 triumph and 1 threat.  It would count as a success, since triumphs count as 1 success.  But there would also be threat.  My question was more along the lines of does the triumph help cancel the remaining threat?  I haven't read anything that says it does, so my guess is that it does not.


"Everyone roll Save vs Death Star."


#10 whafrog

whafrog

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,384 posts

Posted 06 August 2013 - 09:56 AM

Sorry if I was unclear about what the dice were showing.  What I meant was that after all cancellations, only 1 triumph and 1 threat were reamaining.   So, for example, a roll similar to:  3 successes, 3 failures, 1 triumph, 1 advantage, 2 threat.  

 

That would net 1 triumph and 1 threat.

 

No, it would net 1 Triumph, 1 Success, and 1 Threat.  The three other successes were cancelled by three failures, but the Triumph is also a success.  The Triumph does not cancel the Threat though.



#11 Jomero

Jomero

    Member

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 06 August 2013 - 10:04 AM

No, it would net 1 Triumph, 1 Success, and 1 Threat.  The three other successes were cancelled by three failures, but the Triumph is also a success.  The Triumph does not cancel the Threat though.

 

 

 

 

That's what I said in the sentence right after your cutoff.  When I said "net" I meant symbols on the die.   I am fully aware triumphs count as both 1 success as well as an additional bonus (that cannot be cancelled).

 

But I do appreciate the reply.


Edited by Jomero, 06 August 2013 - 10:06 AM.

"Everyone roll Save vs Death Star."


#12 whafrog

whafrog

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,384 posts

Posted 06 August 2013 - 10:12 AM

Sorry, I didn't cut off to be a jerk or something, I just thought expressing it fully rather than qualifying it after would be more clear.



#13 Jomero

Jomero

    Member

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 06 August 2013 - 10:31 AM

No worries!   I wasn't upset.  Was just making sure we were on the same page.  :)


"Everyone roll Save vs Death Star."


#14 Voice

Voice

    Member

  • Members
  • 417 posts

Posted 06 August 2013 - 06:55 PM

Best advice I can give for funky results. Resolve the positive results first (or if you are a kind GM, resolve the players side of the deal first, e.g. advantage/triumph on PC rolls, threat/despair on NPC rolls) as that establishes a boundary to work on the rest of the dice results.

 

The actions should result in more complex events but shouldn't undo each other. So if a PC rolls 3 advantage and wants to make an NPC fall over, they shouldn't then on the despair have the NPC bounce right back up.

 

Personally, as a forgiving GM, I'd be more inclined to fill in the negatives first, so that the players have the option of using their Triumph or Advantages to help mitigate some of the threat they just rolled if they so desire.

 

Using the 'slice the door' scenario above for example:

If he players net 1 triumph, and 1 threat, but no successes (the triumph's success was canceled by a failure).

Not only do they fail to get the door open (no successes), but they hear the marching footsteps of a squad of troopers turn down the corridor on the other side of the door (threat).

They then have the option to spend their Triumph to:

  • Buy some more time by having the squad's normal patrol be interrupted by some minor officer ordering them to do *something* that will take them away from that door for the time being.
  • Or they could spend that Triumph to get in position to ambush the squad when it comes through the door, giving them a way through *if* they can handle what's coming from the other side.
  • Or they can spend it to find a hiding spot so the patrol passes without noticing them.
  • Or they manage to tell from the computer (somehow) that the approaching squad is a group of technical staff who have been working extra shifts, and now (with some decent checks) they can pretend to be a relief crew, and progress further without drawing suspicion.


#15 Nashable

Nashable

    Member

  • Members
  • 190 posts

Posted 07 August 2013 - 09:40 AM

 

Best advice I can give for funky results. Resolve the positive results first (or if you are a kind GM, resolve the players side of the deal first, e.g. advantage/triumph on PC rolls, threat/despair on NPC rolls) as that establishes a boundary to work on the rest of the dice results.

 

The actions should result in more complex events but shouldn't undo each other. So if a PC rolls 3 advantage and wants to make an NPC fall over, they shouldn't then on the despair have the NPC bounce right back up.

 

Personally, as a forgiving GM, I'd be more inclined to fill in the negatives first, so that the players have the option of using their Triumph or Advantages to help mitigate some of the threat they just rolled if they so desire.

 

Using the 'slice the door' scenario above for example:

If he players net 1 triumph, and 1 threat, but no successes (the triumph's success was canceled by a failure).

Not only do they fail to get the door open (no successes), but they hear the marching footsteps of a squad of troopers turn down the corridor on the other side of the door (threat).

They then have the option to spend their Triumph to:

  • Buy some more time by having the squad's normal patrol be interrupted by some minor officer ordering them to do *something* that will take them away from that door for the time being.
  • Or they could spend that Triumph to get in position to ambush the squad when it comes through the door, giving them a way through *if* they can handle what's coming from the other side.
  • Or they can spend it to find a hiding spot so the patrol passes without noticing them.
  • Or they manage to tell from the computer (somehow) that the approaching squad is a group of technical staff who have been working extra shifts, and now (with some decent checks) they can pretend to be a relief crew, and progress further without drawing suspicion.

 

 The bullets you listed though are exactly what I'm talking about. They are different, complex things that don't contradict the positive. What I meant (and have seen) is GMs doing things like "You open the door but because of the threat it closes again"

 

How you get to those ideas is of course down to group/GM style. For me I find it easier if I allow my players the blank canvas and then I paint in around them.


Member of the Brick Vader fan-club (NSFW)
Author of the award winning Ship Repair for GMs (Detailed | Simple)


#16 Voice

Voice

    Member

  • Members
  • 417 posts

Posted 07 August 2013 - 10:49 PM

 

 

Best advice I can give for funky results. Resolve the positive results first (or if you are a kind GM, resolve the players side of the deal first, e.g. advantage/triumph on PC rolls, threat/despair on NPC rolls) as that establishes a boundary to work on the rest of the dice results.

 

The actions should result in more complex events but shouldn't undo each other. So if a PC rolls 3 advantage and wants to make an NPC fall over, they shouldn't then on the despair have the NPC bounce right back up.

 

Personally, as a forgiving GM, I'd be more inclined to fill in the negatives first, so that the players have the option of using their Triumph or Advantages to help mitigate some of the threat they just rolled if they so desire.

 

Using the 'slice the door' scenario above for example:

If he players net 1 triumph, and 1 threat, but no successes (the triumph's success was canceled by a failure).

Not only do they fail to get the door open (no successes), but they hear the marching footsteps of a squad of troopers turn down the corridor on the other side of the door (threat).

They then have the option to spend their Triumph to:

  • Buy some more time by having the squad's normal patrol be interrupted by some minor officer ordering them to do *something* that will take them away from that door for the time being.
  • Or they could spend that Triumph to get in position to ambush the squad when it comes through the door, giving them a way through *if* they can handle what's coming from the other side.
  • Or they can spend it to find a hiding spot so the patrol passes without noticing them.
  • Or they manage to tell from the computer (somehow) that the approaching squad is a group of technical staff who have been working extra shifts, and now (with some decent checks) they can pretend to be a relief crew, and progress further without drawing suspicion.

 

 The bullets you listed though are exactly what I'm talking about. They are different, complex things that don't contradict the positive. What I meant (and have seen) is GMs doing things like "You open the door but because of the threat it closes again"

 

How you get to those ideas is of course down to group/GM style. For me I find it easier if I allow my players the blank canvas and then I paint in around them.

 

 

No argument, I was just mentioning the difference in order that I'd use.  I'd hate to have players use a triumph and end up feeling like they got shafted because I filled in after them, and they couldn't take that into account when they were deciding how to spend the triumph.

 

With small advantage vs. Despair, I might be more inclined to have part of the Despair simply be that they didn't notice what was going on until it was too late to do anything about it.  But Triumph?  I just feel like the players should have as much information as possible about what's going on so they can make a good decision there.

 

Of course, there's the caveat that if the players *want* to fill in the details first, I won't stop them, and I'll do my best to avoid directly cancelling out their good with my bad.  (I agree, that's pretty cheesy.)


Edited by Voice, 07 August 2013 - 10:53 PM.


#17 Jomero

Jomero

    Member

  • Members
  • 58 posts

Posted 08 August 2013 - 12:49 PM

I'd never have a successful door open and then re-shut on them due to threat.   I see threat as something unrelated, but parallel, to the specific task at hand.  That task can either succeed or fail.   Some might argue that "well, they *did* open the door" but just closing it on their face again works against the spirit threat is supposed to represent to the dice rolls.


  • Krieger22 likes this

"Everyone roll Save vs Death Star."


#18 MaddockKrug

MaddockKrug

    Member

  • Members
  • 203 posts

Posted 27 December 2013 - 10:57 PM

*resurrect*

 

Hello.

 

Sometimes searching forums is really helpful, because today I played the game the first time and we had the very same discussion about how to resolve "Triumph" in the face of a "Threat". But in fact: your discussion does not provide full support on the questions we had.

 

The netto dice-role we had during gameplay was like this:

1 Success

1 Triumph

1 Threat

which actually means or translates into:

2 Successes

1 Triumph

1 Threat

 

That's the surface of things.

 

In our playgroup we got into a serious and long discussion, because neither ther game-material for starters (the new beginners box or whatever it is called) nor the core rulebook for Star Wars: Edge of the Empire really prove to be reliable sources to get a clear picture about how to solve "Triumh" vs. "Threat".

 

All the prepared and ready-to-play characters show a brief summary of all six different dice-results. And there you find this wording für "Advantage" and "Triumph":

 

"Advantage * symbols indicate a positive side effect or consequence,..."

 

"Triumph" * symbols count as Success * symbols and may also be spent to trigger a powerful positive consequence."

 

(page 2 of each character sheet)

 

And when you look into the core rulebook (I don't have it at my place now, but I recall this:), you will find a description for "Triumph" telling you that "Triumph" is basically a more powerful version of "Advantage" with a stronger narrative outcome.

But what does this mean in relation to "Threats"?

a) You could argue that "Advantages" and "Threats" are a completely different category of dice-results, which require you to treat those dice-results seperately from the other catgory of dice, which would be "Triumph" and "Despair". You could support this position with the concept that "Advantages" and "Threats" nullify each other, while "Triumphs" and "Despairs" stand alone and keep existing, no matter what.

b) On the contrary you could say: Since "Advantages" and "Triumphs" are described as being or triggering "positive consequences", there is no need to give them different understandings. Actually there is no solid reason why "triggering a positive consequence" with a "Triumph" should not be able to nullify a single "Threat", because this would make the "Triumph" inferior to an "Advantage" although it is meant to be more powerful than an "Advantage". Only a weak, but still supportive additional argument would be that the whole dice-mechanics of SW - EtoE aim at simplification, which would render a hard distinction between "Advantage" and "Triumph" unreasonable.

In other words: There are two very different readings or possible understandings how to relate "Triumphs" to "Threats" (and thus "Despairs" to "Advantages") and thus solve the above-mentioned dice-result - and both in my opinion would be equally valid. In order to get back into playing again we decided to rule it as described in b). We did not feel very comfortable with this solution, but we had the same amount of doubts about solution a) and just decided a "gamers friendly" outcome.

So I humbly ask you to consider these two differing thoughts and to offer aid in order to find the "right" solution; I especially address the game-designers with this question for clarification on this one.

 

In short: Does a single "Triumph" nullify a single "Threat" like a single "Advantage" nullifies a single "Threat"?

Thank you very much in advance.

Best wishes!


Edited by MaddockKrug, 27 December 2013 - 11:09 PM.

For GM: Mad's Adventure, Adventure Hooks, NPCs, and Locations - same at RPGGEEK

 

SW, to me, is a Spaghetti Western with space ships for horses. No matter what you do it causes a problem.  You just might save the day.  Crazy heroics and adventure!

 


#19 Bronski

Bronski

    Member

  • Members
  • 101 posts

Posted 28 December 2013 - 12:32 AM

The Triumph part of a Triumph doesn't cancel out anything nor can anything cancel it. A Triumph also counts as a success. The success part can be canceled. 

 

You could roll a 1 Triumph, 1 Success, 2 Failure, 2 Threat. Your final results would be no successes, 1 Triumph, and 2 Threat.

 

You can also roll a Triumph and a Despair on the same roll. They don't cancel each other out.



#20 whafrog

whafrog

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,384 posts

Posted 28 December 2013 - 12:56 AM

In short: Does a single "Triumph" nullify a single "Threat" like a single "Advantage" nullifies a single "Threat"?

 

No, you're overthinking it.  As laid out in the book: Advantages and Threats cancel each other, but have no impact on Success/Failure/Triumph/Despair; Successes and Failures cancel each other, but have no impact on Advantage/Threat/Triumph/Despair; Triumphs and Despairs aren't cancelled by anything, however, the successes and failures they stand for can be cancelled by other failures and successes respectively.

 

This means there is a maximum 4 possible dice result to be interpreted for each roll:  1)  Success or Failure; 2) Advantage or Threat; 3) Triumph; 4) Despair.

 

And that's all there is to it.


  • bladerunner_35 and EldritchFire like this




© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS