Jump to content



Photo

EotE Core Rulebook Errata


  • Please log in to reply
267 replies to this topic

#261 poeticruse

poeticruse

    Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 09 June 2014 - 01:29 PM

p.60 & p.79

 

Point blank under both the Gadgeteer and the Mercenary Soldier says"

 

"attacks made while at close range or engaged"

 

And should say:

 

"attacks made while at short range or engaged".

 

The latter is what it says on page 141, and only makes sense. Close range seems to be the starship version of engaged.



#262 elicross

elicross

    Member

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 23 June 2014 - 06:16 PM

I've noticed some places where the context suggests a die symbol should appear, but instead there's a greater-than-or-equal symbol (example: pg. 228, under Critical Hit Rating). I gathered from context that the greater-than-or-equal symbol is a placeholder that should've been replaced by an Advantage symbol. Is that correct?


Edited by elicross, 23 June 2014 - 06:21 PM.


#263 edisung

edisung

    Member

  • Members
  • 142 posts

Posted 14 July 2014 - 07:44 PM

so it has almost been a full year since v1.0 of the faq/errata came out...are they planning on updating that soon or what?



#264 Venthrac

Venthrac

    Member

  • Members
  • 897 posts

Posted 15 July 2014 - 07:14 AM

I'm not aware of any such plans, but feel free to use the forum tool for asking questions of the developers to find that out for yourself.



#265 awayputurwpn

awayputurwpn

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,413 posts

Posted 16 July 2014 - 03:51 PM

Close range seems to be the starship version of engaged.

 

Almost. Engaged is a subset of the Short Range band. Close Range is a range band all to itself. 



#266 willh

willh

    Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 20 August 2014 - 03:54 PM

Hi

 

I'm new here so please forgive if I ask a question already considered.

 

In my personal copy of the Core Rulebook, page 105 has what looks like a printing smudge, making some of the text unreadable.

 

Is there anyway I could get a copy of page 105?

 

Help in this would be much appreciated.

 

Willh. 



#267 kaosoe

kaosoe

    Not the GM my players need, but the one they deserve.

  • Members
  • 1,504 posts

Posted 20 August 2014 - 06:09 PM

Hi

 

I'm new here so please forgive if I ask a question already considered.

 

In my personal copy of the Core Rulebook, page 105 has what looks like a printing smudge, making some of the text unreadable.

 

Is there anyway I could get a copy of page 105?

 

Help in this would be much appreciated.

 

Willh. 

 

Submit a request here. FFG is usually very helpful.


Scavenger - On the d20Radio forums.

Pronounced: Kay - Oh - So


#268 willh

willh

    Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 20 August 2014 - 06:38 PM

kaosoe

 

Thanks for the prompt reply ... will follow this up.

 

Willh.


Edited by willh, 20 August 2014 - 06:39 PM.





© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS