Jump to content


Deathwatch Living Errata/FAQ

  • Please log in to reply
186 replies to this topic

#181 Atellus



  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 01 June 2012 - 11:58 AM

 I've got a question about the scolastic lore: codex astartes, is it an oversight that it is not a part of the ultramarines advances? It seems strange that the only ones that can advance normally on that skill is librarians and that the chapter that wrote the codex can not.  

#182 peterstepon



  • Members
  • 264 posts

Posted 26 November 2012 - 07:25 AM

This is a great thread.  Nice to see that everyone likes the new weapons stats in the Errata.

The vast majority of the comments have been about the Marines and their weapons.  What have people thought about the updated xenos weapons for Tyrannids and Tau?  My first impression last year is that it would make combat too deadly for space marines.  What have peoples experiences been with the new weapons for aliens and how did this change the game from pre to post errata?

#183 Gantz the slaughterer

Gantz the slaughterer


  • Members
  • 143 posts

Posted 28 November 2012 - 04:55 AM

there is no way that the FFG do an update of the Errata PDF?


i will become mad in order to extrapolate all from the forum…



  • Stormwulf likes this

#184 Cryhavok



  • Members
  • 354 posts

Posted 18 January 2013 - 05:57 AM

Two things I dont like about the new weapons profiles is, only heavy weapons can do full auto, and lightning claws lost tearing. The lightning claw change has my players asking to change thier signature wargear as they can no longer use fleshrender with them. The full auto change, while Im not sure if it is balanced or not, I do know that fluff/story/non rules -wise this change makes no sense at all. Auto guns arent even auto anymore, they are now semiautoguns. If they are picking between balance and story, they are failing… The rules require both.

#185 Nikollo



  • Members
  • 32 posts

Posted 31 January 2013 - 03:23 PM

Wow, considering when the last update was, this seems a little late.

Anyways, I was looking at the HB Errata stats, and I can't say I agree with them entirely. In the game I'm in, house rule is that HB's RoF is 6, which is entirely reasonable. However, looking at the reduced damage I can't say it makes sense to me.

(I'm about to make a comparison between Deathwatch and the Tabletop 40k game, bear with me, please)

In the tabletop game, a boltgun is a Rapid-Fire weapon, meaning it counts as making two effective attacks at half range if no movement is made, the equivalent of a Full-Auto burst from the unmodified Core Rules for the Godwyn (The Errata Rules for the Godwyn make no sense to me), if one treats two shots in Deathwatch as one shot in 40k Tabletop. The HB at RoF 6 would make sense under this conversion, as in Tabletop the HB is a Heavy 3 weapon (three effective attacks a turn). However, the HB is one  Strength higher than the Boltgun (HB: 5, Bolter: 4). Given that this is on a scale of 10, the difference is by no means insignificant. 

In Deathwatch, I don't believe that this difference is properly accounted for by an increase in Pen by 1, and an increase in minimum damage by 3. It seems to me the only option is to increase pen and minimum damage, or go back to 2d10 while reducing the minimum, ie: 1d10+15 or 2d10+8.

While theformer would increase the minimum damage, it would reduce the maximum, as it narrows the damage range. The latter would decrease minimum damage to that of a Boltgun, but would be able to potentially inflict more damage than the maximum of the former. These are just examples for the sake of argument, mind.

The HB as originally described in the Core Rulebook is definitely OP, but the Errata rules do, indeed, weaken it considerably. There needs to be some middle ground.


#186 Stormwulf



  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 04 April 2013 - 08:01 AM

Are there any plans to update the Errata?



#187 Ephel_duatH



  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 17 June 2013 - 07:51 PM

Hi, I also join those who ask for some information about faq.
It does not seem very serious by the FF, as doubts are many and the manuals are full of errors and ambiguities. Dark Heresy and Rogue traders are constantly updated while Deathwatch has had the latest update 2 years ago.
I would ask someone to answer us about the relase of errata and faq.

  • Stormwulf likes this

© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS