Jump to content



Photo

Giving this another go. Advice?


  • Please log in to reply
51 replies to this topic

#1 Kilazar

Kilazar

    Member

  • Members
  • 68 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 07:21 AM

I have started two campaigns, and they have fallen a part as the OL just keeps getting stomped. Each one stopped at the end of the first act. And the game has been shelved. My group is going to try this again with some modifications. 

 

 

First we are going to use "Roleplaying" rules to limit qaurterbacking. Players can help each other with their turn, but only by offering non specific advice. it is up to the player who's turn it is to decide how to act on that advice.

 

Ex - "We really need to kill those zombies, but beware their flank, there is support from the hound!". Instead of "Ok move 3 up, use 2 stamina to move 2 up. That puts you in the middle of the zombies and out of the hounds reach. Then hit that master zombie with your......"

 

 

Second we are going nekkid. No expansions, no LT packs. Just the core box.

 

 

Third character selection modification

 

Looking for Ideas on how to avoid the hero's auto picking Aldric (or whatever his name is. The badass healer).

 

Right now I'm thinking all the hero's are separated into class's. The player then picks the main class, and subclass. Then rolls a die to determine what hero in the class they get. Maybe with one reroll. -- Looking for thoughts or other ideas on this.

 

 

And finally. What OL deck should I have the OL studying prior to this weekends endeavor?

 

 

 

We are dedicating the whole day this Saturday. I am open to any and all suggestions that may improve our overall experience. And give both sides a chance at winning.


Edited by Kilazar, 05 August 2014 - 07:22 AM.

  • Eighth Air Force likes this

#2 AiriusTorpora

AiriusTorpora

    Member

  • Members
  • 37 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 07:49 AM

How many heros? The game is really only balanced with 4. After that you need a badass gamer as the overlord to makeup for the fact that you have 4 brains working against you.

 

I love the challenge and often stomp the heros.



#3 thedremak

thedremak

    Member

  • Members
  • 51 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 09:27 AM

I'm crushing my heroes as overlord and I usually win. Maybe have a different person be overlord if your overlord keeps getting crushed. Shelving the game after the first act isn't a good idea either since the second act is more fun and as overlord I win more second act quest than act 1 quests.

#4 thedremak

thedremak

    Member

  • Members
  • 51 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 09:27 AM

Also the game tends to be more fun for us with all the extra stuff.

#5 Kilazar

Kilazar

    Member

  • Members
  • 68 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 09:38 AM

We have tried different OL's. The game always comes down to 4 v 1 that is really 1v1 cause there is a quarterback mathing everything out for everyone. So it's 100% co operation with no arguing on the player end, but only one player is really making all the decisions.

 

And the monsters never seem potent enough to get through Alvric's healing wall. If the OL makes a single mistake the heroes just rock him/her.

 

But I'm not here to complain. I'm here to ask for assistance in making the experience more balanced. Because I LOVE this game. It's just no one wants to be the OL anymore.



#6 thedremak

thedremak

    Member

  • Members
  • 51 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 09:51 AM

My heroes work together also. I once lost all three act one quests, we didn't do rumors, I won the interlude and every quest after. As the overlord, just remember that your monsters are so much stronger act 2 and that the only thing that really matters is the finale.

#7 Alarmed

Alarmed

    Member

  • Members
  • 61 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 10:47 AM

As has been said, quitting after the first act is not helpful, since neither side has the real momentum...

 

Even after 2, 3 quests, the momentum can shift in an instant, with the right card turned at the right instant.

 

You mention there's a quarterback mathing everything out. Has this person taken a turn in the OL's chair? If they like math so much, they should be given the occasion to math everything to their heart's content. :P

 

When my group plays, when often take time to strategize, but it's the character's player who has the final say on how he moves and what actions he takes. It sometimes turns out that the "quarterbacks" aren't always right... and with dice involved, even planning to the exact drops of Stamina used every turn doesn't always helps (Ask our "mage" who always seems to roll an X on his Blue die when the pressure's on and we need a blast RIGHT NAOW! :o )



#8 Kilazar

Kilazar

    Member

  • Members
  • 68 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 11:36 AM

As has been said, quitting after the first act is not helpful, since neither side has the real momentum...

 

Even after 2, 3 quests, the momentum can shift in an instant, with the right card turned at the right instant.

 

You mention there's a quarterback mathing everything out. Has this person taken a turn in the OL's chair? If they like math so much, they should be given the occasion to math everything to their heart's content. :P

 

When my group plays, when often take time to strategize, but it's the character's player who has the final say on how he moves and what actions he takes. It sometimes turns out that the "quarterbacks" aren't always right... and with dice involved, even planning to the exact drops of Stamina used every turn doesn't always helps (Ask our "mage" who always seems to roll an X on his Blue die when the pressure's on and we need a blast RIGHT NAOW! :o )

Yup every person has been OL at this point And the mather's still fall short against coherent player groups. When the players get to choose their char combos.

 

Mostly it's the Aldriv/alvric/alwhatever as the disciple I think, that just makes everything the OL can do null and  void damage wise.

 

The hero's don't split off, and they focus fire. Or they block corridor. 

 

Oh one other game breaking combo that we found (to our group anyway) is the necromancer with the character that gets brightblaze. It was such a stupidly powerfull force modifier that we have banned the combo.

 

 

Now you say that in act 1 there is no snowball. But I disagree, each game of ours the chars have been able to get most if not all treasure items to get stipdly decked out, and win every encounter, banking up xp and skills. While the poor overlord barley gets any advancement or new OL cards.

 

At that point it doesn't matter if the OL still has a chance, it really doesn't look like the OL has a single chance. I WANT to do the act 2 stuff to see if the act 2 monsters are beefy enough to take out a fully decked out act 1 party. But by this time everyone is burned out on the OL's plight. 

 

 

Again, not complaining. I really want OL tactics / help for whomever ends up being OL this weekend. What deck should they take, what monsters should the OL almost never use? What should be the go too's for the OL.


Edited by Kilazar, 05 August 2014 - 11:46 AM.


#9 Whitewing

Whitewing

    Member

  • Members
  • 379 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:14 PM

It sounds like you're focusing way too much on actually doing damage to the heroes. Very few of the encounters actually require the heroes to be knocked out, and you almost always have the tools to do that.

 

Proper use of overlord cards and pursuing your primary objective with delaying tactics against the heroes is basically the way to go. Focusing on killing them all repeatedly is usually not successful.


  • griton likes this

#10 Zaltyre

Zaltyre

    Member

  • Members
  • 477 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:19 PM

I don't think you should cut out all expansions, especially if you don't like Avric as he is one of two healers in the base set. However perhaps a random draw of two or three hero sheets per player followed by free class selection would be appropriate for your group . Rather than starting a new campaign immediately, I recommend an epic play quest at the highest level. If you want to stretch your act 2 monster legs, that is how. An OL pulling no punches could try warlord or infectors decks. I like basic 2, but if you are getting beat go basic.

Regarding QB heroes, it is everyone's job to keep that in check. Heroes are a team and SHOULD work together, but no player should feel forced to stick to one person's plan. Moreover, heroes who stick together expose weaknesses beyond being knocked out. Play the objective, forget about knocking down heroes unless you must. Rather, go on the objective offensive and make them react to YOUR schemes!

Edited by Zaltyre, 05 August 2014 - 12:21 PM.


#11 Kilazar

Kilazar

    Member

  • Members
  • 68 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:33 PM

We don't focus on damage. We focus on getting the objective on both sides. But if part of getting the objective is blocking a corridor so nothing can get through, the Heroes have the advantage. OL blocks with something big, players just nuke it in one player turn. 

 

If they decide to block a corridor so the OL's mobs can't complete the objective without passing.. again, the heroes can just take their time getting treasure and or slaughter the mobs without progressing, while the OL is stuck trying to pass through the wall of death.

 

Thanks for the help though. I think I'll move on from this thread as I'm just retreading the same answers over and over. We'll see how the game goes this weekend if the OL still gets trashed through the whole game we'll just reshelve. But this time we have enough time dedicated so that we should get through a couple act 2 quests. And everyone has said they will press on through at least 2 act2's. If not the whole campaign.



#12 Alarmed

Alarmed

    Member

  • Members
  • 61 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 12:42 PM

I've played Avric Albright several times (including one memorable time as a spirit seeker who killed Gryvorn using Tempest) and he is a good, strong hero, but he is not unkillable or unstoppable, unless someone's missing something.  I've found that creatures like Barghests whose howl saps stamina, or creatures with stun, or even just creatures with ranged attacks, forcing the players to split-up further than 3 squares are all good ways of getting your licks in.



#13 Whitewing

Whitewing

    Member

  • Members
  • 379 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 04:09 PM

I should also point out that limiting expansions actually makes things easier for the heroes and harder on the overlord. The expansions do add options for heroes, but that's all chosen before the game actually starts (like new classes or heroes). The expansions add more options and power for the overlord than they do for the heroes: new monsters so you can have a monster that suits the mission better, new overlord cards so you can target weaknesses, etc.

 

Some lieutenant packs can help a lot as well. In particular, Baron Zachareth's plot deck is extremely powerful, and a variety of others provide useful and helpful options.



#14 Zaltyre

Zaltyre

    Member

  • Members
  • 477 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 05:16 PM

You can't block goblin archers, or hybrids, or harpies, or plague worms. The OL is/are clearly not adapting to the hero strategy. There are plenty of annoying hero teams. I do not believe that any are unstoppable with the right strategy. It is true that the role of OL is unforgiving-mistakes cost you BIG. However, with the right mix of luck and cunning, the heroes will perish.

#15 Steve-O

Steve-O

    Member

  • Members
  • 4,628 posts

Posted 05 August 2014 - 08:35 PM

Looking for Ideas on how to avoid the hero's auto picking Aldric (or whatever his name is. The badass healer).
 
Right now I'm thinking all the hero's are separated into class's. The player then picks the main class, and subclass. Then rolls a die to determine what hero in the class they get. Maybe with one reroll. -- Looking for thoughts or other ideas on this.


Sounds overly fiddly. Probably ineffective, too. If you're playing core game only, there are only two Healers available. Therefore even with a die roll, the would-be Healer has a 50/50 chance of getting Avric. Add in an optional re-roll and the odds go up.

Plus the other hero players have to go through this charade of a house rule that's really only there to stop the Healer from picking Avric by default.

I would suggest to simply ban Avric if you really feel that strongly about it. That or scratch the "core game only" rule and go with something like "pick your archetype. Draw 3 heroes, pick 1. Now pick your class." If you have the CK, there's enough heroes there to make the odds of getting Avric sufficiently low.

 

And finally. What OL deck should I have the OL studying prior to this weekends endeavor?


If you're playing core game only, there is only one OL deck =P

Edited by Steve-O, 05 August 2014 - 08:35 PM.


#16 Kilazar

Kilazar

    Member

  • Members
  • 68 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 06:20 AM

You can't block goblin archers, or hybrids, or harpies, or plague worms. The OL is/are clearly not adapting to the hero strategy. There are plenty of annoying hero teams. I do not believe that any are unstoppable with the right strategy. It is true that the role of OL is unforgiving-mistakes cost you BIG. However, with the right mix of luck and cunning, the heroes will perish.

 

 

We only own the core and the LT packs that match it. Goblin archers are a joke. The ranged picks them off like they are nothing. The only time they are remotely effective is if the OL can triple move them with an OL card. But it has not happened often. 

Can't say anything bout the others as we don't have access to them. Not really up to spending more money on the game if everyone is not happy with the core package. I really like the game and want to spend more money on it. But the rest of my group is very meh about it at this point. It took some major convincing to get them to give me an entire day noon to midnight this Saturday with it. 

 

 

 

In regards to the OL deck. The core comes with 3 different xp paths I thought. Like saboteur something and something. I'm more asking what xp path seems to be consistently more effective.

 

And I forgot there are not that many heroes in the core. Last time we played someone had bought the conversion kit, so we had a ton of heroes. That kit has since been sold by said person because he thought we were never playing again. So I guess the character answer is just ban alvric as disciple. 


Edited by Kilazar, 06 August 2014 - 06:23 AM.


#17 Eighth Air Force

Eighth Air Force

    Member

  • Members
  • 21 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 09:43 AM

I have started two campaigns, and they have fallen a part as the OL just keeps getting stomped. Each one stopped at the end of the first act. And the game has been shelved. My group is going to try this again with some modifications. 

 

 

First we are going to use "Roleplaying" rules to limit qaurterbacking. Players can help each other with their turn, but only by offering non specific advice. it is up to the player who's turn it is to decide how to act on that advice.

 

Ex - "We really need to kill those zombies, but beware their flank, there is support from the hound!". Instead of "Ok move 3 up, use 2 stamina to move 2 up. That puts you in the middle of the zombies and out of the hounds reach. Then hit that master zombie with your......"

 

 

Second we are going nekkid. No expansions, no LT packs. Just the core box.

 

 

Third character selection modification

 

Looking for Ideas on how to avoid the hero's auto picking Aldric (or whatever his name is. The badass healer).

 

Right now I'm thinking all the hero's are separated into class's. The player then picks the main class, and subclass. Then rolls a die to determine what hero in the class they get. Maybe with one reroll. -- Looking for thoughts or other ideas on this.

 

 

And finally. What OL deck should I have the OL studying prior to this weekends endeavor?

 

 

 

We are dedicating the whole day this Saturday. I am open to any and all suggestions that may improve our overall experience. And give both sides a chance at winning.

 

I have started two campaigns, and they have fallen a part as the OL just keeps getting stomped. Each one stopped at the end of the first act. And the game has been shelved. My group is going to try this again with some modifications. 

 

 

First we are going to use "Roleplaying" rules to limit qaurterbacking. Players can help each other with their turn, but only by offering non specific advice. it is up to the player who's turn it is to decide how to act on that advice.

 

Ex - "We really need to kill those zombies, but beware their flank, there is support from the hound!". Instead of "Ok move 3 up, use 2 stamina to move 2 up. That puts you in the middle of the zombies and out of the hounds reach. Then hit that master zombie with your......"

 

 

Second we are going nekkid. No expansions, no LT packs. Just the core box.

 

 

Third character selection modification

 

Looking for Ideas on how to avoid the hero's auto picking Aldric (or whatever his name is. The badass healer).

 

Right now I'm thinking all the hero's are separated into class's. The player then picks the main class, and subclass. Then rolls a die to determine what hero in the class they get. Maybe with one reroll. -- Looking for thoughts or other ideas on this.

 

 

And finally. What OL deck should I have the OL studying prior to this weekends endeavor?

 

 

 

We are dedicating the whole day this Saturday. I am open to any and all suggestions that may improve our overall experience. And give both sides a chance at winning.

 

 

I have started two campaigns, and they have fallen a part as the OL just keeps getting stomped. Each one stopped at the end of the first act. And the game has been shelved. My group is going to try this again with some modifications. 

 

 

First we are going to use "Roleplaying" rules to limit qaurterbacking. Players can help each other with their turn, but only by offering non specific advice. it is up to the player who's turn it is to decide how to act on that advice.

 

Ex - "We really need to kill those zombies, but beware their flank, there is support from the hound!". Instead of "Ok move 3 up, use 2 stamina to move 2 up. That puts you in the middle of the zombies and out of the hounds reach. Then hit that master zombie with your......"

 

 

Second we are going nekkid. No expansions, no LT packs. Just the core box.

 

 

Third character selection modification

 

Looking for Ideas on how to avoid the hero's auto picking Aldric (or whatever his name is. The badass healer).

 

Right now I'm thinking all the hero's are separated into class's. The player then picks the main class, and subclass. Then rolls a die to determine what hero in the class they get. Maybe with one reroll. -- Looking for thoughts or other ideas on this.

 

 

And finally. What OL deck should I have the OL studying prior to this weekends endeavor?

 

 

 

We are dedicating the whole day this Saturday. I am open to any and all suggestions that may improve our overall experience. And give both sides a chance at winning.

All I can say is good luck to you. I have said that this game is an enigma; Descent 2 does not lend itself well to home-brewed adaptations regardless of what you try. I have tried the "narrative"  DM role-play approach; it did not work. I have tried to make better use of the skill checks and incorperated a rule where we imagined that the green round search tokens were trasure chests. The hero that searched the chest was required to make a search action to open the chest and then rolled the black/grey defense dice modified by plus or minus one depending on the type of hero that made the attempt. an unsuccessful skill check resulted in the "treasure box" being empty.

 

This seemed to work at first until act 2 when the heroes were getting mauled because of the large amount of treasure/gold not found in act 1. So far, I have been randomly drawing two hero cards per player of the archetype the player has chosen and allowed each player to pick the best character of the two they received. They were then allowed to pick their class as normal. This has been an improvement but it still is not perfect. I do have a theory as to what the problem with this game is. I am currently play-testing an idea of mine; look for a new thread soon as I am going to explain it in detail.



#18 thedremak

thedremak

    Member

  • Members
  • 51 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 11:14 AM

Saying there is major things wrong with this game reminds me of when I was watching the world cup at a bar by my house and there was this drunk American watching perhaps his first soccer game and the whole time he was shouting out these dumb ideas on how to make soccer better. Descent is balanced in my opinion but if you have a not so talented overlord and a great player as a hero, the heroes will probably win. A talented overlord who understands the game, the overlord will win.
I'm sure I would win or at least make it challenging for the players is I was your overlord, with no restrictions. Where do you live? I have saturday off.
  • Carbini and drummondii like this

#19 Carbini

Carbini

    Member

  • Members
  • 148 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 12:37 PM

Where do you live? I have saturday off.

Hahahaha...

::Phone rings::

"Yes?"
"An Overlord?"
"Uh huh"
"Yes sir I..."
"Yea"
"I'll be there Saturday. Thank you... Mr President..."

::click::


Edited by Carbini, 06 August 2014 - 12:38 PM.

  • drummondii and Eighth Air Force like this

#20 Eighth Air Force

Eighth Air Force

    Member

  • Members
  • 21 posts

Posted 06 August 2014 - 12:39 PM

Saying there is major things wrong with this game reminds me of when I was watching the world cup at a bar by my house and there was this drunk American watching perhaps his first soccer game and the whole time he was shouting out these dumb ideas on how to make soccer better. Descent is balanced in my opinion but if you have a not so talented overlord and a great player as a hero, the heroes will probably win. A talented overlord who understands the game, the overlord will win.
I'm sure I would win or at least make it challenging for the players is I was your overlord, with no restrictions. Where do you live? I have saturday off.

I am not going to debate with you on who the better gamer is. I have no reason to doubt you and am sure that you do really well. I agree with you that this game is well balanced; my friends and I have had a blast with the Shadow Rune Campaign (although I own everything, thus far we have only played the starting campaign) and have played the Overlord in turn.

 

I believe that the problem lies in the lack of mortality for both hero and OL. There never seems to be mortal repercussions as a direct result of a poor decision that I or another have made. If anyone dies in this edition of Descent, they are simply "revived" in the next turn. That's it, no permanent setbacks or fear of committing their forces of good or ill to battle so and so as everyone is rewarded for failure by earning an experience point regardless.

 

This to me cheapens the overall experience for me on a personal level. And lets be clear, you and I know that the heroes can play the "loose to win" strategy whereby each player focuses on treasure hunting until the end of the game, collects the best treasure before the final battle and then commits to operation "Ground and Pound".






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS