Jump to content



Photo

Z-Swarm the new swarm meta?


  • Please log in to reply
195 replies to this topic

#1 jpltanis

jpltanis

    Member

  • Members
  • 117 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:23 PM

I've just completed a few battles using 3-12pt Zs and 3-12pt Ties.  The Z wins pretty consistently (the higher PS is the difference).   I played the Zs and used X-wing AI application to control the Ties.

I am wondering, if others are seeing the similar results.  

I am pretty sure that the 8 Z vs 8 Tie (swarm vs swarm) will result in Z winning most of the times (due to the higher pilot skill) too.  If this is the case, I can see the naked Z-swarm being more formidable than the 8-Tie Academy swarm.   This in-turn makes the Z swarm more superior and perhaps the new swarm meta.

 


  • Joe Boss Red Seven and VorackTheGrim like this

#2 Lagomorphia

Lagomorphia

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,167 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:25 PM

You're playing against a crude bot. I wouldn't draw any conclusions about the metagame from that.


  • devotedknight, Vorpal Sword, bobbywhiskey and 10 others like this

#3 Sithborg

Sithborg

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,485 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:30 PM

Also, 36 pts doesn't tell you the full story, as you lack the full potential of 100pts. 8 TIEs vs 8 Z-95s isn't the issue. I question how well the 8 Z-95s will do against the Howlrunner swarm, as they don't exactly have a good replacement for Howlrunner.


  • Ghaerdon likes this

#4 iPeregrine

iPeregrine

    Member

  • Members
  • 511 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:31 PM

I played the Zs and used X-wing AI application to control the Ties.


Well there's part of your problem, you're giving one side a huge skill advantage. An AI program might be useful for basic testing to see if a list is even worth trying against a real player, but you can't draw any serious balance conclusions from it. Play some real games against an equally-skilled opponent and see if your results continue to favor the z-95s.

8-Tie Academy swarm


And there's the other part. Why aren't you using Howlrunner, the most powerful swarm ability in the game? Stop playing a bad TIE swarm list and you should see different results.
  • bobbywhiskey likes this

#5 Hobojebus

Hobojebus

    Member

  • Members
  • 805 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:34 PM

Yeah ai isn't a substitute for good old human cunning.

 

If you joust ties versus z`s of course you'll come off worse, ties have speed and manuverability that out matches z95`s and proper use of that will even things out.  



#6 jpltanis

jpltanis

    Member

  • Members
  • 117 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 05:46 PM

I wanted to maintain 12pt/ships test (apple vs apple).   I realized that Howl plays a big part in the effectiveness of the Tie swarm, but Howl is not a 12pt ship.  

 

The Z-swarm is likely to target lock Howl and focus fire on him at first contact and most likely take him out during first round of fighting.   Howl can only maybe damage one Z, before the Zs return fire. 

 

I don't have 8 Zs to do a full test and am hoping the community can do a more real battle (human vs Human).  I believe that the Z-swarm may not be out of the question in tournament play.  


  • oddeye and Nataris like this

#7 oddeye

oddeye

    Member

  • Members
  • 534 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:00 PM

ive seen quite a few people here (mathhammers) say that the 95' is better per point cost than the tie.. there was an entire thread on it somewhere buried here on the forums. tie was 100% and the 95' was like 112% or 106% or something. in comparison a y wing was 88%.  

 

Like the OP said, he/she is only taking into account 12 ship versus 12 ship. sure howl will make a difference, so will a couple of well placed assault missiles...cough.. ermmm...


I see your schwartz is as big as mine. Let's see how you handle it!


#8 Rambler

Rambler

    Member

  • Members
  • 62 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:31 PM

Alright bump it to 5 Academies + Howlie vs 6 Headhunters with a single Assault Missile.

I think you will be surprised how long a 3 Agility + Evade will last against 2 Attack Dice. Go ahead and please focus fire on the ship that has already fired.

Edit added 2 Attack Dice.

Edited by Rambler, 11 July 2014 - 07:15 PM.


#9 Mikael Hasselstein

Mikael Hasselstein

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,272 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:34 PM

Yeah, there's no point in matching 3 Bandits against 3 TIEs, even with two human pilots; same goes for 8 vs. 8. Numbers is not the only part of the swarm.

 

Sorry, OP, this is not an adequate test.

 

Now, it would be interesting if you flew the Zs against the AI, but you wouldn't be testing the Z swarm vs. TIE swarm, but testing the added value of a human player by comparing to your earlier scores.


  • Vorpal Sword likes this

#10 Vorpal Sword

Vorpal Sword

    O frabjous day!

  • Members
  • 2,136 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:38 PM

I wanted to maintain 12pt/ships test (apple vs apple).   I realized that Howl plays a big part in the effectiveness of the Tie swarm, but Howl is not a 12pt ship.  
 
The Z-swarm is likely to target lock Howl and focus fire on him at first contact and most likely take him out during first round of fighting.   Howl can only maybe damage one Z, before the Zs return fire. 
 
I don't have 8 Zs to do a full test and am hoping the community can do a more real battle (human vs Human).  I believe that the Z-swarm may not be out of the question in tournament play.


The problem is (still) that your test doesn't have much bearing on tournament play, because 8-TIE swarms are a fairly rare beast.
  • Sithborg likes this

#11 Emperor Palpatine

Emperor Palpatine

    Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:46 PM

I'm going to be out of line here and say I don't rate the Z95 at all. A poor movement dial (no sharp 1 turns or 5 straight forwards means it's slow and not very manoeuvrable), weak attack, weak evade and it's a carrier for ordinance that may well fail and which pushes up its cost to 15 points minimum but often a lot more than that. Go for a decent pilot skill and you can be spending nearly a quarter of your squad points on a 2 attack dice ship with an unreliable missile. Munitions Failsafe may help a bit but there's always the chance that you will just do 1 hit making it a waste or that your pilot skill is so low you will be dead before you get that second shot.

 

Not a useless ship, I can see how it could be fitted out with assault missiles to defeat TIE swarms but as an Imperial player I rarely fly a swarm anyway. Z95s just look like cannon fodder to me.

 

I realise that isn't the "received wisdom" and expect to be told I am wrong many times in many ways but that's just the way I see it.



#12 WonderWAAAGH

WonderWAAAGH

    Oasean Ork

  • Members
  • 2,783 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 06:53 PM

I'm going to be out of line here and say I don't rate the Z95 at all. A poor movement dial (no sharp 1 turns or 5 straight forwards means it's slow and not very manoeuvrable), weak attack, weak evade and it's a carrier for ordinance that may well fail and which pushes up its cost to 15 points minimum but often a lot more than that. Go for a decent pilot skill and you can be spending nearly a quarter of your squad points on a 2 attack dice ship with an unreliable missile. Munitions Failsafe may help a bit but there's always the chance that you will just do 1 hit making it a waste or that your pilot skill is so low you will be dead before you get that second shot.
 
Not a useless ship, I can see how it could be fitted out with assault missiles to defeat TIE swarms but as an Imperial player I rarely fly a swarm anyway. Z95s just look like cannon fodder to me.
 
I realise that isn't the "received wisdom" and expect to be told I am wrong many times in many ways but that's just the way I see it.


Well, you are wrong in many ways. You don't seem overly receptive for a debate on the issue, so I'll just ask you, how comprehensive is your experience with this game?

A study in scarlet letters.


#13 Emperor Palpatine

Emperor Palpatine

    Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:04 PM

 

I'm going to be out of line here and say I don't rate the Z95 at all. A poor movement dial (no sharp 1 turns or 5 straight forwards means it's slow and not very manoeuvrable), weak attack, weak evade and it's a carrier for ordinance that may well fail and which pushes up its cost to 15 points minimum but often a lot more than that. Go for a decent pilot skill and you can be spending nearly a quarter of your squad points on a 2 attack dice ship with an unreliable missile. Munitions Failsafe may help a bit but there's always the chance that you will just do 1 hit making it a waste or that your pilot skill is so low you will be dead before you get that second shot.
 
Not a useless ship, I can see how it could be fitted out with assault missiles to defeat TIE swarms but as an Imperial player I rarely fly a swarm anyway. Z95s just look like cannon fodder to me.
 
I realise that isn't the "received wisdom" and expect to be told I am wrong many times in many ways but that's just the way I see it.


Well, you are wrong in many ways. You don't seem overly receptive for a debate on the issue, so I'll just ask you, how comprehensive is your experience with this game?

 

18 months or so. Am happy to debate it as long as it's polite but it's 2 AM in the morning in the UK as I type. I may check back tomorrow. We've played a little bit now with various Z95 builds and they have just been ripped apart, their 1 success being ionising a shuttle, even then they all died. BTW I am a 48 year old historical wargamer so I have no interest in tournaments or teenage tantrums such as seen in 40K etc, I'm not implying you would behave in that way for a moment but I've seen too many interesting topics descend into abuse, I can't be bothered with that.


  • voidstate and That One Guy like this

#14 WonderWAAAGH

WonderWAAAGH

    Oasean Ork

  • Members
  • 2,783 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:09 PM

No, we can keep this polite. You just make it sound like you've made up your mind and can't be budged on the issue. It behooves us all to keep an open mind when people hold an opinion that we don't understand. I'll try to address your main points one at a time:

 

1) The Z-95's dial is actually very average, slightly different from an X-Wing's, but no worse. Only three Rebel ships have a 1-hard maneuver (one of which is red, and another you're likely to pay over 42 points for), so that's not really a mark against the Z-95. Similarly, only two Rebel ships have a 5-straight. It does share a 3-K with both the A-Wing and YT. Again, the Z-95's dial is very average, but I count that as a good thing - especially since you're only paying 12 points for it.

 

2) The Z-95's attack is no more weak than your average TIE Fighter, and, according to the math-wingers, the Z-95 is alleged to be slightly more durable than the TIE while costing the same amount. Those two red dice really start to add up when you throw them enough times, which is what you should be doing for only 12 points a ship. I'm not sure a competent player would accuse the TIE Fighter of being mere "cannon fodder," so perhaps we should keep a similarly open mind about the Z-95.

 

3) The Z-95 is far and away a better generic missile platform than the A-Wing. The A-Wing is overpriced enough as it is, without factoring in the cost of ordnance. Five ships loaded for bear makes for one heck of an alpha-strike, and the fact that you can field that many ships mitigates the risk of losing one before it shoots, owing to its low PS. When it comes to fielding ordnance, no other ship compares to the Z-95, not even the TIE Bomber.

 

4) Both of the named pilots are slightly more niche than your average Z-95, so they don't fit the same filler role as a Bandit or Tala Squadron Pilot. Blount is good when you absolutely have to get a missile off, and Cracken is quickly becoming one of my favorite Rebel pilots. At only 21 points - the same cost as a Rookie Pilot - you get a ship that can share both an action and PS8 at range 1. He is more fragile than your average X-Wing, which means you can't just throw him into any list and expect your opponent to ignore him. If you can find a way to protect him, however, that's still less than a quarter of your points well spent.


Edited by WonderWAAAGH, 11 July 2014 - 07:50 PM.

  • voidstate, Millennium Falsehood, mrkyle and 4 others like this

A study in scarlet letters.


#15 Emperor Palpatine

Emperor Palpatine

    Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:14 PM

No, we can keep this polite. You just make it sound like you've made up your mind and can't be budged on the issue. It behooves us all to keep an open mind when people hold an opinion that we don't understand.

 

No, that's not the case at all. That's why I said they " look like" cannon fodder as opposed to saying "they are" cannon fodder if you see what I mean.



#16 Aminar

Aminar

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,083 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:17 PM

I'm going to be out of line here and say I don't rate the Z95 at all. A poor movement dial (no sharp 1 turns or 5 straight forwards means it's slow and not very manoeuvrable), weak attack, weak evade and it's a carrier for ordinance that may well fail and which pushes up its cost to 15 points minimum but often a lot more than that. Go for a decent pilot skill and you can be spending nearly a quarter of your squad points on a 2 attack dice ship with an unreliable missile. Munitions Failsafe may help a bit but there's always the chance that you will just do 1 hit making it a waste or that your pilot skill is so low you will be dead before you get that second shot.
 
Not a useless ship, I can see how it could be fitted out with assault missiles to defeat TIE swarms but as an Imperial player I rarely fly a swarm anyway. Z95s just look like cannon fodder to me.
 
I realise that isn't the "received wisdom" and expect to be told I am wrong many times in many ways but that's just the way I see it.

If a ship needs a 1 turn or five straight to be good most ships in the game are awful.
The Z-95s dial is just fine. It has two hard turns, 3 banks, the 1 forward(also known as the best move in the game) and a reliable k-Turn. The 5 Forward is, for lack of a better word, meh. 1 Turns, while fantastic, are not necessary.
The Z-95 is a fantastic little ship, capable of a number of useful things. I'm not sure how it compares to a 15 point A-Wing, but if I had to guess it would be favorably. That 3 points allows for a lot of other tools on bigger more important ships.
2 Attack dice is bad on ships that cost a lot. On anything 16 points or less for the base model it's proven to be very good.

#17 Mikael Hasselstein

Mikael Hasselstein

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,272 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:17 PM

I realise that isn't the "received wisdom" and expect to be told I am wrong many times in many ways but that's just the way I see it.


Well, you are wrong in many ways. You don't seem overly receptive for a debate on the issue, so I'll just ask you, how comprehensive is your experience with this game?

18 months or so. Am happy to debate it as long as it's polite but it's 2 AM in the morning in the UK as I type. I may check back tomorrow.

...

BTW I am a 48 year old historical wargamer so I have no interest in tournaments or teenage tantrums such as seen in 40K etc, I'm not implying you would behave in that way for a moment but I've seen too many interesting topics descend into abuse, I can't be bothered with that.

 

Like my big green friend, I was also inclined to tell you you were wrong. Not so much because of any of the Z-95's deficiencies (I think it's rather cute), but because I thought you would appreciate a little forum persecution. Your last statement there seemed to suggest that you had some expectations, and I didn't want those to go unfulfilled.

 

So, you're wrong.

 

:P

 

  • "many ways"  - check
  • "many times" - check

  • Dr. Z and VorackTheGrim like this

#18 Emperor Palpatine

Emperor Palpatine

    Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:37 PM

 

I realise that isn't the "received wisdom" and expect to be told I am wrong many times in many ways but that's just the way I see it.


Well, you are wrong in many ways. You don't seem overly receptive for a debate on the issue, so I'll just ask you, how comprehensive is your experience with this game?

18 months or so. Am happy to debate it as long as it's polite but it's 2 AM in the morning in the UK as I type. I may check back tomorrow.

...

BTW I am a 48 year old historical wargamer so I have no interest in tournaments or teenage tantrums such as seen in 40K etc, I'm not implying you would behave in that way for a moment but I've seen too many interesting topics descend into abuse, I can't be bothered with that.

 

Like my big green friend, I was also inclined to tell you you were wrong. Not so much because of any of the Z-95's deficiencies (I think it's rather cute), but because I thought you would appreciate a little forum persecution. Your last statement there seemed to suggest that you had some expectations, and I didn't want those to go unfulfilled.

 

So, you're wrong.

 

:P

 

  • "many ways"  - check
  • "many times" - check

 

 

Yeah I put that bit because I have seen some nastiness online in my time on wargames forums. To be honest I don't have much interest in sci fi other than the Alien films and think Star Wars movies are good but nothing special, cutting edge in their day way back in 76/77 though to be fair. My late wife, God rest her, watched the Phantom Menace after we had visited the Mos Eisley film set on our honeymoon in Tunisia. She had never seen a Star Wars film before but got up after 20 minutes declaring the film to be "silly" and "boring". I wouldn't go that far but I don't  think of myself as a "fan boy", have no interest in the EU (I thought that meant European Union up until recently) and am not overly excited by the upcoming films though I will watch them when they come out. I just think X-Wing is a great game with nice models that look good. It's no headache wargaming with no painting involved. I really enjoy it.



#19 WonderWAAAGH

WonderWAAAGH

    Oasean Ork

  • Members
  • 2,783 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:42 PM

Alright, I think I'm finally finished editing my previous post.


  • oddeye likes this

A study in scarlet letters.


#20 Mikael Hasselstein

Mikael Hasselstein

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,272 posts

Posted 11 July 2014 - 07:49 PM

Yeah I put that bit because I have seen some nastiness online in my time on wargames forums. To be honest I don't have much interest in sci fi other than the Alien films and think Star Wars movies are good but nothing special, cutting edge in their day way back in 76/77 though to be fair. My late wife, God rest her, watched the Phantom Menace after we had visited the Mos Eisley film set on our honeymoon in Tunisia. She had never seen a Star Wars film before but got up after 20 minutes declaring the film to be "silly" and "boring". I wouldn't go that far but I don't  think of myself as a "fan boy", have no interest in the EU (I thought that meant European Union up until recently) and am not overly excited by the upcoming films though I will watch them when they come out. I just think X-Wing is a great game with nice models that look good. It's no headache wargaming with no painting involved. I really enjoy it.

 

Well, forums are the natural habitat of the nerdrager (or 'neckbeard' as our friend Captain Lackwit would put it).

 

We have a little bit of that over here, but I think it's relatively sedate.

 

Well, the Phantom Menace was a disappointment for most of us. But, I expect it was certainly no big feature in your life if you're not a sci-fi (or 'space opera' fan). Whatever floats your boat, man. I'm glad you enjoy the game, even if you don't dig it for the same reasons I do.

 

For me, real-world conflict - and, for that matter, the European Union - is just work, so I like the escape of Star Wars. That said, I like using real-world dynamics to flesh out my understanding of the Star Wars Universe in a playful way.

 

And yes, I think the Z-95 is cute. I may be told I'm wrong, but that's just the way I feel. :lol:






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS