Jump to content



Photo

How big do RT fleets get?


  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21 BaronIveagh

BaronIveagh

    Member

  • Members
  • 936 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 09:00 PM

You understood my point exactly! Most Rogue trader flotilla's in BFG were basically 1 Flagship with a number of smaller escorts and transports. In your example: The other repulsive could be taken off your total simply by placing it on one of your existing trade routes. You are exactly right also that while a Major player like Sebastian Winterscale probably has access to a pretty sizeable fleet it's doubtful that it sails around accompanying him! My system is a reflection of this.

 

 

 

It's been a while, but I think you';re confusing pirate wolfpack fleets with rogue traders as far as BFG goes, at least since FAQ 2010.



#22 Nameless2all

Nameless2all

    Member

  • Members
  • 760 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 10:25 PM

 

And btw Rogal, where did you get the Fleet Management System?  Is this a home-brew?

 

It's home brewed.  The name of the creator has been lost to time, but a copy of his work (and others that have been "acquired") can be found in the link below in my signature. 


For a collection of fan created material, please refer to the link below. Some of it was edited/created by myself and friends, while most is other fan material. Happy gaming people.https://drive.google.com<p>-"May your endeavors always be prosperous, though they may not always be profitable."


#23 Radwraith

Radwraith

    Member

  • Members
  • 942 posts

Posted 02 June 2014 - 02:39 PM

 

You understood my point exactly! Most Rogue trader flotilla's in BFG were basically 1 Flagship with a number of smaller escorts and transports. In your example: The other repulsive could be taken off your total simply by placing it on one of your existing trade routes. You are exactly right also that while a Major player like Sebastian Winterscale probably has access to a pretty sizeable fleet it's doubtful that it sails around accompanying him! My system is a reflection of this.

 

 

 

It's been a while, but I think you';re confusing pirate wolfpack fleets with rogue traders as far as BFG goes, at least since FAQ 2010.

 

No, but thanks anyway  :) ! I remember a Mini group that were marketed as a RT and "escorts". The flagship was what in BFK is called the Galleon class. The Escorts were a mismash of frigates and transports. Can't point to it exactly since the specialist games website is gone but I do remember it!



#24 Kasatka

Kasatka

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 03 June 2014 - 05:24 AM

Ah you must be referring to this set of ships. Google image search is your friend.

rogue+trader+battlefleet+gothic+3.jpg


  • Vandegraffe likes this

Only the insane have strength enough to prosper.

Only those that prosper may truly judge what is sane.


#25 Marwynn

Marwynn

    Member

  • Members
  • 500 posts

Posted 03 June 2014 - 06:56 AM

Yeah, it was kinda weird we didn't get the generic Rogue Trader cruiser. It's not that different stats-wise. 


Beyond Reach - The New Adventures of the Strom Dynasty

The Tau Fleet | The Tyranid Hive Fleet | Battlefleet Jericho


#26 Amazing Larry

Amazing Larry

    Member

  • Members
  • 331 posts

Posted 03 June 2014 - 03:05 PM

To anwser the original question I would say the fleets get as big as the RT in question both want and are able to make them, HOWEVER a large RT fleet is not realisitcally going to be in one place all at once. Most of the other ships are going to be charter vessels making milk runs or captained by trusted vassels and bannermen off protecting various interests, conducting business and working on approved side projects.

 

My players are getting really expansive and ambitious about their fleet and I've basically told them that's fine but very few tasks are going to justify the deployment of more than one to three of their favorites and subsequently rolling around with an entourage of ten ships is going to be anti-profitable for most tasks.


  • Iku Rex likes this

#27 BaronIveagh

BaronIveagh

    Member

  • Members
  • 936 posts

Posted 03 June 2014 - 04:07 PM

Yeah, it was kinda weird we didn't get the generic Rogue Trader cruiser. It's not that different stats-wise. 

THe 'Rogue Trader' cruiser is actually just a regular Imperial Cruiser hull but in the style of ships launched at Kar Duniash as opposed to Cypra Mundi,  Mars or Voss. Based on the artwork, the Sovreign Venture is a Kar Duniash built ship.


Edited by BaronIveagh, 03 June 2014 - 04:08 PM.


#28 Kasatka

Kasatka

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 02:57 AM

Whilst the cruiser and the escort pictured in the middle (a cobra) are heavily modified, i think the other two ships were meant to represent either modified civilian ships, salvaged ancient ships or even xenos ships.

I always felt the idea of buying the same set of ships as everyone else to represent what was meant to be a singularly unique rogue trader's fleet was a bit odd and that if you really wanted to field an RT fleet you should convert other models.


Only the insane have strength enough to prosper.

Only those that prosper may truly judge what is sane.


#29 Annaamarth

Annaamarth

    Member

  • Members
  • 415 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 03:27 AM

Yeah, I noticed that foremost frigate didn't look terribly Imperial- it has the flattened look of Tau small craft and vehicles, but they tend to be broader.

 

Speaking of profitable fleets, it occurs to me that the acquisition of an additional ship could be a minor endeavour in and of itself.  From that perspective, it seems to me that each cargo/commerce vessel acquired and tasked to commercial duties might provide bonus profit factor, or reduce losses to profit factor from events.

 

Do you think that would encourage your group to back off the fleet-building and focus on making that pile of thrones?


RIP AND TEAR THROUGH THE TIDE OF BLOOD WITH BATTLESUIT PILOT. SUPLEX HIVE TYRANTS. DO WHATEVER, YOU'RE PILOTING A HUGE-ASS MECHA.

 -Errant, on how Rogue Trader ought to be played


#30 Kasatka

Kasatka

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,118 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 03:58 AM

Well quite often having other ships to scout warp routes, ferry cargo or troops or provide escort will equate down to one thing simply - less outlay in acquisitions for an endeavour and thus more raw profit at the end.


Only the insane have strength enough to prosper.

Only those that prosper may truly judge what is sane.


#31 Lady Kataline Jianwei

Lady Kataline Jianwei

    Member

  • Members
  • 79 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 01:23 PM

Yeah, I noticed that foremost frigate didn't look terribly Imperial- it has the flattened look of Tau small craft and vehicles, but they tend to be broader.

 

Speaking of profitable fleets, it occurs to me that the acquisition of an additional ship could be a minor endeavour in and of itself.  From that perspective, it seems to me that each cargo/commerce vessel acquired and tasked to commercial duties might provide bonus profit factor, or reduce losses to profit factor from events.

 

Do you think that would encourage your group to back off the fleet-building and focus on making that pile of thrones?

 

I don'y know about how other groups handle the purchasing of ships but it is something of a minor endeavor for our group. We generally have to make an inquiry check just to see what is available in any given market before moving on to the actual acquisition roll. That is fairly minor.

 

To get our Repulsive GCs we had to really get on the Navy's good side and had to run several missions to do so. After that we still traded in a ton of captured ships and had to convince the Navy we would use the ships wisely. And for good. Something about responsibility was also thrown in there but then we all just laughed.


"Defeat? Genocide? Why quibble with semantics?"

 


#32 Errant Knight

Errant Knight

    Member

  • Members
  • 564 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 02:02 PM

My latest group drew up (all RAW) a ship with about 2500 points in achievement points bonuses.  Needless to say, it broke the game before they cast off on their first voyage.  I didn't want to penalize them for intelligent ship design so I needed ways to get them to spend their PF.  I charged them for colonies (and then Stars of Inequity came out, so cool) and I charged them for Acquisition bonuses (RAW) and still I needed more, so I started charging them for the outright purchase of ships.  Refits from captures was another thing altogether, but outright purchase was 20% of total SPs, and they didn't get to design those ships (but of course they refitted them to outrageous standards).  Still, after over 2 years of playing bi-weekly sessions they have a PF of about 120-130.



#33 Radwraith

Radwraith

    Member

  • Members
  • 942 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 04:18 PM

Ah you must be referring to this set of ships. Google image search is your friend.

rogue+trader+battlefleet+gothic+3.jpg

Yes that's the one!

 

As to the 'Generic' RT Cruiser, I don't think that's the case. I believe the vessel in this case is supposed to represent a Star Galleon like the Conquest class. 

 

As to why the Flagship would be "free" is simple. The Flagship is always assumed to be paying for itself from the activities it is undertaking to increase PF!


Edited by Radwraith, 04 June 2014 - 04:26 PM.


#34 kobrain

kobrain

    Member

  • Members
  • 29 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 05:21 PM

My latest group drew up (all RAW) a ship with about 2500 points in achievement points bonuses.  Needless to say, it broke the game before they cast off on their first voyage.  I didn't want to penalize them for intelligent ship design so I needed ways to get them to spend their PF.  I charged them for colonies (and then Stars of Inequity came out, so cool) and I charged them for Acquisition bonuses (RAW) and still I needed more, so I started charging them for the outright purchase of ships.  Refits from captures was another thing altogether, but outright purchase was 20% of total SPs, and they didn't get to design those ships (but of course they refitted them to outrageous standards).  Still, after over 2 years of playing bi-weekly sessions they have a PF of about 120-130.


Wow, what was that design? I'm really curious now

Map of Calixis Sector and Koronus Expanse

https://drive.google...dit?usp=sharing


#35 Errant Knight

Errant Knight

    Member

  • Members
  • 564 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 06:25 PM

Orion Star Clipper

 

Speed:  11

Maneuverability:  +30

Detection:  +10

Hull Integrity:  32

Armor:  0

Turret Rating:  1

Power:  40

Space:  40

SP:  70

Population:  102

Morale:  100

Crew Rating:  30

Planet-bound for Millenia:  +10 Maneuverability within 5 VUs of a planet

 

Component

Power

Space

SP

Notes

Modified Lathe 1 Drive

(40)

8

*

+1 speed

Bridge of Antiquity

1

1

2

+10 Command and Social, +5 Maneuver

BC Miloslav Warp Engines

7

9

2

x2 Warp speed, encounters every 3 days

Warpsbane Hull

1

0

2

Navigation (Warp) +10, roll twice and choose

GC Repulsor Shield

5

1

1

No maneuver penalty for celestial phenom

BC Vitae Pattern Life Sustainer

3

1

2

 

GC Voidsmen Quarters

1

2

1

 

GC M-100 Augur Array

2

0

1

 

Main Cargo Hold

2

*

*

 

8 x GC Luxury Passenger Quarters

8

8

16

 

GC Tenebro Maze

1

1

3

+10 Command v. Hit & Run, choose crits

GC Empyrean Mantle

2

0

3

Silent Running +2 degrees

Teleportarium

1

1

1

 

GC Arboretum

1

2

2

+2 pop, x2 endurance

GC Voss Torpedo Tubes

1

4

2

 

BC Disruption Macrocannon

4

2

4

+1 strength, +1 damage

 

Achievement Bonuses:

Trade 925

Creed 800

Criminal 850

 

That's 2,575 Achievement Points.  It was drawn up using the Warrant Path, and while we didn't originally play using Mathhammer, we have been now for quite some time.  I didn't let them have the full bonuses after the first endeavor and I made them spend considerable effort finding colonists to fill their passenger quarters with.  Still, as you can see it was quite a challenge.

 

Edit: Ok, that sucked the way it changed my easily read table.


Edited by Errant Knight, 04 June 2014 - 06:28 PM.


#36 Vandegraffe

Vandegraffe

    Member

  • Members
  • 423 posts

Posted 04 June 2014 - 11:21 PM

Errant Knight, pardon the nit-pick but I don't think that build is legal, RAW.  Specifically, the luxury passenger quarters (and nearly all the other items) are one per ship.  Check the errata;  a whole mess of upgrades got that little dagger icon that means one only.

 

Cheers,

- V.



#37 Errant Knight

Errant Knight

    Member

  • Members
  • 564 posts

Posted 05 June 2014 - 08:00 AM

My errata says that Additional Components are limited to 1 per ship, not Supplemental Components.  If Supplemental Components were 1 per ship you wouldn't be able to load multiple weapons-types.  Luxury Passenger Quarters are listed under Supplemental Components - Cargo Holds and Passenger Components, not Supplemental Components - Additional Facilities..  I wish you were right, but unless my book and errata are old and outdated (errat v. 1.4), that ship is legal RAW.

 

I believe you are quoting this passage...

 

Additional Facilities (page 204): All additional facilities
should be marked with †, as these Components may not be
selected more than once per vessel.
 
I don't mind the nit-picking at all.  In fact, If I'm wrong, please point me to the eratta that changes this.  I haven't found it.


#38 Annaamarth

Annaamarth

    Member

  • Members
  • 415 posts

Posted 05 June 2014 - 08:21 AM

That's not a warship, that's a luxury passenger liner.  They're flying the Titanic.  Holy Jesus.

 

Side note: Yeah, looks legal to me.  Also hilarious, so I'd have let them roll with it anyway, probably.


RIP AND TEAR THROUGH THE TIDE OF BLOOD WITH BATTLESUIT PILOT. SUPLEX HIVE TYRANTS. DO WHATEVER, YOU'RE PILOTING A HUGE-ASS MECHA.

 -Errant, on how Rogue Trader ought to be played


#39 Errant Knight

Errant Knight

    Member

  • Members
  • 564 posts

Posted 05 June 2014 - 10:07 AM

As a post-script I'd point out the ship no longer exists.  But it lasted long enough to make the party very very wealthy.  It also caused them to permanently burn a few Fate Points each.  Explosions and implosions tend to have that effect.



#40 Annaamarth

Annaamarth

    Member

  • Members
  • 415 posts

Posted 05 June 2014 - 10:40 AM

...I'm not seeing a convincing argument for "not the Titanic" there.


  • Nameless2all likes this

RIP AND TEAR THROUGH THE TIDE OF BLOOD WITH BATTLESUIT PILOT. SUPLEX HIVE TYRANTS. DO WHATEVER, YOU'RE PILOTING A HUGE-ASS MECHA.

 -Errant, on how Rogue Trader ought to be played





© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS