Jump to content



Photo

What are you calling this?


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 dboeren

dboeren

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,174 posts

Posted 31 March 2014 - 01:10 PM

Warhammer 40,000: Conquest is quite a mouthful and at least for me a bit too long for ordinary conversation.

 

So how are you referring to the game?

 

Warhammer: Conquest

40K: Conquest

 

Something else?


  • shipwreck likes this

#2 klaymen_sk

klaymen_sk

    Member

  • Members
  • 374 posts

Posted 31 March 2014 - 01:49 PM

Just "Conquest" or "40k: Conquest"


"To each of us falls a task. And all the Emperor requires of us Guardsmen is that we stand in line, and we die fighting. It is what we do best: we die standing."

-General Sturnn, Cadian 412th regiment


#3 Guitarquero

Guitarquero

    Member

  • Members
  • 138 posts

Posted 31 March 2014 - 02:13 PM

"Conquest" or "that 40k LCG."


Rebels: 4 Xwings, 2 Ywings, 2 Awings, 2 Bwings, 2 HWK 290, 2 YT-1300

 

Imperials: 6 TIE, 3 TIE/In, 2 TIE/A, 2 TIE/B, 2 Firespray, 2 Lamda


#4 TragicTheBlathering

TragicTheBlathering

    Member

  • Members
  • 193 posts

Posted 01 April 2014 - 07:55 PM

? strange question.. um.. Conquest?



#5 Whingewood

Whingewood

    Member

  • Members
  • 32 posts

Posted 02 April 2014 - 01:06 PM

40k LCG is what I've been calling it when enthusing about it to friends, because it eliminates the need for them to ask if it's a new computer game.  :)



#6 qwertyuiop

qwertyuiop

    Member

  • Members
  • 815 posts

Posted 04 April 2014 - 04:13 PM

Conquest Con Queso

#7 booored

booored

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,038 posts

Posted 21 April 2014 - 05:52 PM

Conquest when talking.. but I like to type. "40KLCG" in instant messaging and forums and stuff.
"People should be less concerned about whether they are being insulted and more concerned if it is the truth"

#8 LCGFrank

LCGFrank

    Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 22 April 2014 - 03:18 AM

40K LCG or Conquest!



#9 PsiLAN

PsiLAN

    Member

  • Members
  • 50 posts

Posted 12 May 2014 - 08:16 AM

To this day is just "the warhammer 40.000 card game" in my zone. I guess we'll find a shorter version by the time we start playing it.



#10 SolennelBern

SolennelBern

    Member

  • Members
  • 970 posts

Posted 23 May 2014 - 10:00 PM

War-hammer-Four-tee-thou-sands-Con-Quest

Each word take at least 2 seconds to say with en expiration ending so the other persons can know what you eat during lunch...



#11 xodarap

xodarap

    Member

  • Members
  • 142 posts

Posted 16 June 2014 - 10:23 PM

I'm just calling it Warhammer 40k.  I  usually leave the "conquest" part out becuase news of the game is still new to me and I forget.  We only have a couple of people around our store who even know what the other game is so I don't get challenged on it much.  I'll probably just keep calling it that.


"Hastur. Hastur. Hastur. Suck it, my girlfriend is Science!"
-Will Wheaton-

#12 Darik

Darik

    Member

  • Members
  • 196 posts

Posted 17 June 2014 - 02:27 PM

I have been saying 40K Card Game...but now I think I'll just start going with "Conquest" like others have mentioned. It's shorter and sounds pretty cool.



#13 Dre2Dee2

Dre2Dee2

    Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 03:07 AM

Yeah just saying Warhammer Conquest,  but in short hand for the net I hope WHC will do :)



#14 ripark

ripark

    Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 04 July 2014 - 11:06 AM

In our gaming group it's usually called 40k conquest or 40k LCG.



#15 xodarap

xodarap

    Member

  • Members
  • 142 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 12:27 PM

Conquest Con Queso

Conquest with cheese??  Aren't you even gonna' wait to see how similar it is to other FFG LCGs before crowning it that? 


"Hastur. Hastur. Hastur. Suck it, my girlfriend is Science!"
-Will Wheaton-

#16 booored

booored

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,038 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 07:14 PM

FFG only has 2 other original dueling LCGs. Invasion, and Star Wars and now this, so when comparing FFG lcgs you have to ignore CoC and aGoT. All the others were X-TCGs. A interesting note is all the original dueling LCGs are designed by Eric Lang. They ALL have a lot of similar traits for that reason.


"People should be less concerned about whether they are being insulted and more concerned if it is the truth"

#17 Toqtamish

Toqtamish

    Toqtamish

  • Members
  • 3,400 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 07:54 PM

Just because AGoT and coc used to be tcgs means nothing. They were still FFG games. Also designed by Eric Lang.

#18 booored

booored

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,038 posts

Posted 05 July 2014 - 10:08 PM

What rubbish, of course it does. It means that they were originally designed with a completely different model, the card even had to have changes and tweaks, entire affects lost and cards replaced by others with different text. Same thing happened in CoC. 


"People should be less concerned about whether they are being insulted and more concerned if it is the truth"




© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS