Jump to content



Photo

Heroes you refuse to play with


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1 wyrm187

wyrm187

    Member

  • Members
  • 32 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 03:42 PM

Any heroes you avoid using and why? Whether you don't care for their stats or ability or in my case I cant build anymore glorfindel spirit because I just feel like he's too cheap and easy to play with' do tell.

Also I really like Boooreds idea about releasing a box set that has a lot more player cards in it to start getting into more creative deck building besides the usual combos. Thoughts?

#2 MyNeighbourTrololo

MyNeighbourTrololo

    the Opener of Ways

  • Members
  • 1,809 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 03:51 PM

I don't think there is such hero. There are heroes I can't quite use, like Brand (because I almost never play multiplayer), though I'd love to use him. I even used Caldara outside of monospirit deck.


That's cursed table-talk, and I'll stick you, if you don't shut it down, see?'


#3 wyrm187

wyrm187

    Member

  • Members
  • 32 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 04:13 PM

I'm just burnt out on glorfindel, I guess I feel like he's an easy out. The only other hero I never really use is bifur, not that I dislike him, I just always find a better option

#4 Tracker1

Tracker1

    Member

  • Members
  • 652 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 04:25 PM

From solo perspective, Bard the Bowmen and Brand are heroes I have never been able to build a deck around. It's not that I refuse to play them. It's more that there abilites are mostly related to multi player game. There are a bunch of Dwarves that also fall into this category. I think Dwalin is the worst of them. Reducing threat by 2 for destroying an orc is cool but, starting with 2 attack means he needs tactics attachments to even damage most orcs let alone destroy them. Glorfindel Lore is one that is never sees much use any more, althogh I did build some sucessful decks with him early on, now him and his ability are pretty much useless.

On certain scenarios some of these heroes might be useful, but I don't think I'll ever get much use out of Bard and Brand. Faramir also falls into this category, but I did make a Gondor deck with him that worked okay to get some use out of him.
Also, these heroes might be revived as new player cards emerge.

Awhile ago my list would have included spirit pippin, fatty, and caldera, but I have built some very fun and good decks with them. But these 3 may still be on the list of some other players.
'At last' said Aragorn 'Here are the tracks that we seek!'

#5 born to lose

born to lose

    Member

  • Members
  • 98 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 04:44 PM

Lorefindel gets almost no love in my decks :(



#6 wyrm187

wyrm187

    Member

  • Members
  • 32 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 04:51 PM

Yeah I guess refuse to play was a poor choice for the thread title. . . . .but yeah tracker I'm primarily a solo player as well so that does take a few heroes out of the mix

#7 FeloniusBard

FeloniusBard

    Member

  • Members
  • 23 posts

Posted 17 March 2014 - 06:29 PM

I don't think I'd ever flat out "refuse" to play with a given hero, depending on the game and quest. 

 

But for me, if there's a hero I "avoid" playing, it's Elrond, mostly because like wyrm187 said, Elrond + Vilya feels like an easy out. That, plus his ability to pay for allies of every sphere significantly lowers the degree of difficulty. 

 

I think I'm almost to that point with Spirit Glorfindel as well. It's almost more fun to try and build solo decks WITHOUT him than with him. I already know I can build a killer deck using Spirfindel, Spirit Frodo, and Loragorn. It's more fun to try other stuff out.

 

This is also mitigated by the fact that one of the guys I play with regularly refuses to play anything BUT his favorite deck---Spirfindel, Elrond, and Legolas. So I'd constantly have to be reconfiguring my decks between solo and multiplay anyway if I was using Elrond and Spirfindel. 

 

My next challenge is to build a thematic "princes" deck around Faramir, Eomer, and Imrahil. I've also wanted to do a "Heroes of Ithilien" deck using Eowyn, Faramir, and Beregond. Actually, that Eowyn/Faramir/Beregond combo could be pretty awesome, come to think of it . . . .


Edited by FeloniusBard, 17 March 2014 - 06:31 PM.

  • AUCodeMonkey likes this

#8 lleimmoen

lleimmoen

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,682 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 01:41 AM

Hirluin the Fair and Dain Ironfoot will never see play in our play group until there is reasonable errata.

I really like Fatty Bolger but have so far been quite unable to put him in a deck.

I used to play Tactics Boromir a lot but now I prefer the Leadership version.

Lore Glorfindel has had his role cut out by the Spirit version. And Spirit Pippin by Lore Pippin.


  • Glaurung likes this

#9 Glaurung

Glaurung

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,979 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 01:59 AM

Hirluin the Fair and Dain Ironfoot will never see play in our play group until there is reasonable errata.

I really like Fatty Bolger but have so far been quite unable to put him in a deck.

I used to play Tactics Boromir a lot but now I prefer the Leadership version.

Lore Glorfindel has had his role cut out by the Spirit version. And Spirit Pippin by Lore Pippin.

 

Hmmm you think Dain and Hirluin deserve errata? Do you think they are too powerful?


Wizard is never late.......

 

Glaurung playtrough LOTR LCG on youtube :

http://www.youtube.com/user/olegyd   


#10 Distractionbeast

Distractionbeast

    Member

  • Members
  • 143 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 05:39 AM

I will probably never play Caldara.  She's not horrible, but I don't like hero-sacrificing abilities.  When I play, my friend and I have an unofficial rule that all heroes must survive for a victory.  That adds a tiny bit of challenge to some scenarios and I think keeps the game more interesting.  After all, the fewer heroes you have the flatter the experience becomes - less resources, sometimes loss of a sphere, loss of critical abilities and synergies...  As much as I love Tactics Boromir, I will never use his sacrifice ability.  Consequently, this means cards like Landroval are pretty much useless to us too.  But I definitely prefer to play this way.

 

BTW - Bifur is awesome, especially in multiplayer.  Any hero that "stretches" resources is immediately useful.  Hirluin and Elrond are great for similar reasons, though they've got other talents that often overshadow their resource stretching.



#11 alogos

alogos

    Member

  • Members
  • 419 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 06:41 AM

Spirit Pippin... why did they release him with such a bad ability when Lore Pippin was released a month after with a far better ability ?

Also lore Glorfindel, even if I used him once, it was for fun. Same for Prince Imrahil.

Legolas is always prefered to Bard, Brand, Ellandan, Gimli or Theoden with his unique and usefull ability.

Dwarfs are played only when we all play dwarfs, and oin, gloin, dwalin are avoided.



#12 Nerdmeister

Nerdmeister

    Member

  • Members
  • 639 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 07:06 AM

Caldara can be quite useful in a spirit deck if you find yourself swamped by enemies. Use her for small 1hp damage effects and to block small enemies. Then when all your blockers are exhausted (including Caldara) switch her out for a couple of big(ish) guys to help with blocking or attacking.

Bring Caldara back in with Fortune of Fate (if you got it set up) in the same combat phase and you´re pretty good ahead ahead.


  • Glaurung likes this

#13 lleimmoen

lleimmoen

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,682 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 08:47 AM

 

Hirluin the Fair and Dain Ironfoot will never see play in our play group until there is reasonable errata.

I really like Fatty Bolger but have so far been quite unable to put him in a deck.

I used to play Tactics Boromir a lot but now I prefer the Leadership version.

Lore Glorfindel has had his role cut out by the Spirit version. And Spirit Pippin by Lore Pippin.

 

Hmmm you think Dain and Hirluin deserve errata? Do you think they are too powerful?

 

I think they are poorly designed, Dain and Outlands. Dain because there seems little reason not to run him if you are looking for a powerful Dwarf deck. I believe there should always be a challenge. As it is, it seems lazy, especially with the vast number of readying effects: Lure of Moria, Cram, Erebor Record-keeper (all these even within the Dwarf theme, two of them same sphere as Dain). I believe if they treated Dain as Erebor Battle Master, he would still be a very powerful hero but things would get a bit more interesting. Boosting allies would still be great but the immediate boost for every hero would no longer apply -- in the beginning where stats are most important as a rule.

As for Outlands, we have had a discussion on the topic, and I totally now stand as follows: if each booster (Swordsman, Knigtht, Warrior, Heardsman) could only count once (no matter if you had one or three copies out, each would only grant +1), then things would again be a bit more interesting, though the problem with the Outlands is bigger than that: you have basically got all the cards given to you, there is little room left for deck-building.


  • danpoage and Nickpes like this

#14 lleimmoen

lleimmoen

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,682 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 08:50 AM

Caldara can be quite useful in a spirit deck if you find yourself swamped by enemies. Use her for small 1hp damage effects and to block small enemies. Then when all your blockers are exhausted (including Caldara) switch her out for a couple of big(ish) guys to help with blocking or attacking.

Bring Caldara back in with Fortune of Fate (if you got it set up) in the same combat phase and you´re pretty good ahead ahead.

Caldara will get better when more Spirit allies arrive, especially the stronger ones of the likes of Damrod. Personally, I have never had trouble with the weaker looking heroes, unless they had a stronger alternative version: Glorfindel and Pippin, there seems to be very little competition between the two.



#15 Mndela

Mndela

    Member

  • Members
  • 826 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 09:06 AM

Glorfindel spirit - Eowyn - Hirluin - Dain

 

If i can, i dont play them. But it is ok, anyway.


A wizard is never late..., he arrives precisely when it is the last round


#16 Raven1015

Raven1015

    Member

  • Members
  • 433 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 10:09 AM

The only one I can think of that I will actually refuse to play is Hirluin the Fair, as I refuse to play Outlands in general (other than splashing in certain Outlands allies into regular decks). I actually find Dwarves more palatable, as at least there are a bunch of different variations and interesting combos you can do with them.


Check out my LOTR LCG blog: talesfromthecards.wordpress.com

Listen to The Grey Company podcast: greycompanypodcast.wordpress.com


#17 Mndela

Mndela

    Member

  • Members
  • 826 posts

Posted 18 March 2014 - 11:59 AM

I think dwarfs (and maybe outlanders) in the future wont be so overpowered. Quest will be harder, too harder..., and lots of other nice combos will be: silvans, rohans, etc...

 

I think traits will be more regular. But from progression series approach: now outlanders and dwarfs are overpowered (and Glorfindel over-played :))

 

6vyru.jpg?w=308&h=454

 

(image from TalesfromtheCards)


Edited by Mndela, 18 March 2014 - 12:01 PM.

  • Catastrophic09 likes this

A wizard is never late..., he arrives precisely when it is the last round


#18 Attercop, Attercop 1989

Attercop, Attercop 1989

    Member

  • Members
  • 31 posts

Posted 19 March 2014 - 01:23 AM

If I want to stick fairly close to Tolkein's canon I won't use any of the hobbit heroes, except perhaps Bilbo (lore), (unless I'm playing with the Saga packs of course). If I'm playing with a single deck then I obviously wouldn't be taking Bard or Brand. 


Edited by Attercop, Attercop 1989, 19 March 2014 - 01:38 AM.


#19 Attercop, Attercop 1989

Attercop, Attercop 1989

    Member

  • Members
  • 31 posts

Posted 19 March 2014 - 01:32 AM

 

 

Hirluin the Fair and Dain Ironfoot will never see play in our play group until there is reasonable errata.

I really like Fatty Bolger but have so far been quite unable to put him in a deck.

I used to play Tactics Boromir a lot but now I prefer the Leadership version.

Lore Glorfindel has had his role cut out by the Spirit version. And Spirit Pippin by Lore Pippin.

 

Hmmm you think Dain and Hirluin deserve errata? Do you think they are too powerful?

 

I think they are poorly designed, Dain and Outlands. Dain because there seems little reason not to run him if you are looking for a powerful Dwarf deck. I believe there should always be a challenge. As it is, it seems lazy, especially with the vast number of readying effects: Lure of Moria, Cram, Erebor Record-keeper (all these even within the Dwarf theme, two of them same sphere as Dain). I believe if they treated Dain as Erebor Battle Master, he would still be a very powerful hero but things would get a bit more interesting. Boosting allies would still be great but the immediate boost for every hero would no longer apply -- in the beginning where stats are most important as a rule.

As for Outlands, we have had a discussion on the topic, and I totally now stand as follows: if each booster (Swordsman, Knigtht, Warrior, Heardsman) could only count once (no matter if you had one or three copies out, each would only grant +1), then things would again be a bit more interesting, though the problem with the Outlands is bigger than that: you have basically got all the cards given to you, there is little room left for deck-building.

 

 

After giving this post some thought I think perhaps restricting Dain's ability to dwarf allies would be fair. 

 

In regard to Outlands, I have never really had that much success with them, although they certainly look very powerful on paper and I have heard alot of complaints about them being broken. 



#20 Distractionbeast

Distractionbeast

    Member

  • Members
  • 143 posts

Posted 19 March 2014 - 06:48 AM

 

After giving this post some thought I think perhaps restricting Dain's ability to dwarf allies would be fair. 

 

In regard to Outlands, I have never really had that much success with them, although they certainly look very powerful on paper and I have heard alot of complaints about them being broken. 

 

 

My opinion:

 

Dain was OP after Dwarrowdelf because of the glut of Dwarf card support.  Today, he is less so, since other synergies have been built up to rival him.  He's still very potent, but unless I'm going for a straight-up Dwarf theme, he's not a shoe-in.  Of course the more players you have, the closer to OP he gets.

 

Outlands are OP, but they do take some effort to get up and running.  The problem is they shift the balance of gameplay and make it anticlimactic.  If you can get them going, most scenarios become ridiculously easy.  I've often found myself questing for 20+ without involving my heroes and leaving good attackers and defenders behind - all due to their incredible stat stacking.  And in a 2 player game, my partner never has to worry about questing at all.  Usually, it's downhill from there.  My proposed solution would be to increase the cost of each of the buffing outlands allies by 1.  That would force players to dedicate more support to getting it going.  They wouldn't look nearly as appealing unless you're building specifically for them.






© 2013 Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. Fantasy Flight Games and the FFG logo are ® of Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc.  All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact | User Support | Rules Questions | Help | RSS